The Era of IoT: Will Your Robotic Vacuum Steal Your Cryptocurrency?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-18Actualizado a 2026-01-18

Resumen

In the era of IoT, smart home devices like robotic vacuum cleaners pose significant risks to cryptocurrency security. These easily hackable devices can be exploited to record password inputs or steal seed phrases. With an estimated 18.8 billion IoT devices globally and over 820,000 daily attacks, vulnerabilities are increasing. Examples include a hacked coffee machine displaying ransomware messages, a casino’s smart fish tank leaking 10GB of data, and office door sensors secretly mining Monero. Researchers warn that compromised devices could even destabilize power grids by synchronizing high-energy appliances. To protect against such attacks, experts recommend setting strong passwords, using separate guest networks for IoT devices, disconnecting unused gadgets, and keeping software updated. Avoiding smart devices entirely is another extreme but effective precaution.

Original Title: 'Help! My robot vac is stealing my Bitcoin': When smart devices attack

Original Author: Felix Ng, Cointelegraph

Original Compilation: Deep Tide TechFlow

Smart robotic vacuums and other smart home devices are easily hacked and can be used to record your password inputs or seed phrases.

Imagine waking up one morning to find your robotic vacuum out of control, your refrigerator demanding a ransom, and your cryptocurrency and bank account funds wiped out.

This isn't a scene from Stephen King's 1986 horror film "Maximum Overdrive"—a story about a rogue comet triggering a global machine killing spree.

Instead, it's the real risk that could occur if hackers infiltrate your computer through the smart devices in your home. With the global number of IoT devices expected to reach 18.8 billion and an average of about 820,000 IoT attacks occurring daily, the likelihood of this scenario is increasing.

"Insecure IoT devices (such as routers) can become entry points into home networks," said Tao Pan, a researcher at blockchain security company Beosin, in an interview.

As of 2023, the average U.S. household has 21 connected devices, and one-third of smart home device consumers have experienced a data breach or scam in the past 12 months.

"Once hacked, attackers can move laterally to access connected devices, including computers or phones used for cryptocurrency transactions, and can also capture login credentials between the device and the exchange. This is particularly dangerous for users who use APIs for cryptocurrency trading," he added.

So, what exactly can hackers steal from your home, and what damage can they cause?

"Magazine" has collected some of the most bizarre hacking incidents from recent years, including a case where an access control sensor was hacked to mine cryptocurrency. We've also compiled some practical tips to protect your data and cryptocurrency security.

Hacking the Coffee Maker

In 2019, Martin Hron, a researcher at cybersecurity company Avast, demonstrated how easily hackers can access home networks and their devices.

He chose a simple target: remotely hacking his own coffee maker.

Hron explained that, like most smart devices, the coffee maker used default settings that allowed the device to connect to WiFi without a password, making it easy to upload malicious code to the machine.

"Many IoT devices first connect to the home network through their own WiFi network, which is only used to set up the device. Ideally, consumers would immediately secure this WiFi network with a password," Hron explained.

"But many devices do not come with a password to protect the WiFi network from the factory, and many consumers do not set one," he added.

Original video link: Click here

"I could do whatever I wanted because I could replace the firmware, the software that operates the coffee maker. And I could replace it with whatever I wanted. I could add features, delete features, and also break through the built-in security measures. So, I could do whatever I wanted," he said in a video released by Avast.

In his demonstration, Hron displayed a ransom note through the coffee maker, locking the device until a ransom was paid.

<极mg style="max-width:100%;overflow:hidden;" src="https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2026-01/bf438ab12b0b45c48aa7d25836df54ff.jpg" alt="">

You could choose to turn off the device, but that would mean you'd never get coffee again

(Avast/YouTube)

However, beyond displaying a ransom note, the coffee maker could also be used for more malicious actions, such as turning on the heater to create a fire hazard or喷射沸水 to threaten the victim.

More frighteningly, it could quietly become an entry point into the entire network, allowing hackers to monitor your bank account information, emails, and even crypto seed phrases.

Hacking the Casino Fish Tank

One of the most famous cases occurred in 2017 when hackers transferred 10GB of data by hacking into a connected fish tank in the lobby of a Las Vegas casino.

The fish tank was equipped with sensors for regulating temperature, feeding, and cleaning, which were connected to a computer on the casino's network. The hackers entered other areas of the network through the fish tank and sent data to a remote server in Finland.

The fish tank might have looked something like this

<极m>(Muhammad Ayan Butt/ Unsplash)

Although the casino had deployed常规的 firewalls and antivirus software, the attack was successful. Fortunately, the attack was quickly identified and handled.

Nicole Eagan, CEO of cybersecurity company Darktrace, told the BBC at the time: "We stopped it immediately, and no damage was done." She added that the growing number of internet-connected devices means "it's a hacker's paradise out there."

Door Sensors Can Also Secretly Mine

In 2020, in offices closed globally due to the COVID-19 pandemic, cybersecurity company Darktrace discovered a secret cryptocurrency mining operation—hackers were using a server controlling office biometric access for illegal mining.

The clue to this incident came from the server downloading a suspicious executable file from an external IP address that had never appeared on the network before. Subsequently, the server repeatedly connected to external endpoints associated with the Monero mining pool.

This type of attack is called "cryptojacking." Microsoft's Threat Intelligence team found more such cases in 2023, with hackers targeting Linux systems and smart devices connected to the internet.

Microsoft's investigation found that attackers launch attacks by brute-forcing Linux and IoT devices connected to the internet. Once inside the network, they install backdoor programs and then download and run cryptocurrency mining malware. This not only causes electricity bills to soar but also directs all mining proceeds directly into the hacker's wallet.

Cases of this cryptojacking are层出不穷, with one of the latest involving embedding cryptojacking code into fake 404 HTML pages.

Hacking Smart Devices: Destroying the Power Grid

More frighteningly, security researchers at Princeton University once proposed a hypothesis: if hackers could control enough high-energy-consuming devices, such as 210,000 air conditioners, and turn them on simultaneously, it could cause a power outage equivalent to the population of California—about 38 million people.

极

(Unsplash)

These devices would need to be concentrated in a certain part of the power grid and turned on simultaneously to cause certain power lines to overload, damaging or triggering the protective relays on the lines to shut them off. This would shift the load to the remaining lines, further stressing the grid and ultimately triggering a chain reaction.

However, this scenario would require precise malicious timing, as grid fluctuations are common during special weather conditions (such as heat waves).

The Robotic Vacuum Is Watching You

Last year, robotic vacuums in various parts of the United States suddenly started up on their own. It turned out that hackers had discovered a serious security vulnerability in a Chinese-made Ecovac robotic vacuum.

According to reports, hackers could remotely control these devices, using them to scare pets, shout profanities at users through built-in speakers, and even use built-in cameras to spy on users' homes.

An image from the live feed of a hacked Ecovac robotic vacuum

(ABC News)

"A serious problem with IoT devices is that many manufacturers still pay insufficient attention to security issues," said cybersecurity company Kaspersky.

It goes without saying that if hackers have video footage of you entering passwords or recording seed phrases, the consequences would be disastrous.

How to Protect Yourself from Smart Device Hacks?

Look around, and you might find that almost every device in your home is connected to the internet—robotic vacuums, digital photo frames, doorbell cameras. So how do you keep your Bitcoin safe?

One option is to adopt the method of professional hacker Joe Grand: completely avoid using any smart devices.

"My phone is the smartest device in my home, but even then, I use it reluctantly, only for navigation and communication with family," he once told "Magazine." "But smart devices? Absolutely not."

Avast's Hron said the best approach is to ensure you set passwords for smart devices and avoid using default settings.

Other experts recommend using a separate guest network for IoT devices, especially those that don't need to share a network with computers and phones; disconnecting devices when not in use; and keeping software up to date.

Additionally, there are paid search engines that can help users view the connected devices in their homes and potential vulnerabilities.

Recommended Reading:

RootData 2025 Web3 Industry Annual Report

Binance Power Shift: The Dilemma of a 300 Million User Empire

Beyond Stablecoins: Circle Releases 2026 Strategy Report, Internet Financial System Has Fully Emerged

InfoFi Narrative Collapses, Kaito, Cookie, and Others相继关停 Related Products

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is one of the main security risks associated with smart home appliances like robot vacuums?

ASmart home appliances like robot vacuums can be easily hacked to record password inputs or mnemonic phrases, potentially leading to the theft of cryptocurrencies and bank funds.

QHow did a researcher demonstrate the vulnerability of IoT devices using a coffee machine?

AResearcher Martin Hron from Avast demonstrated that a smart coffee machine could be easily hacked by exploiting its default settings, which allowed him to upload malicious code, display a ransom note, and potentially access the entire home network.

QWhat was the unusual method hackers used to steal data from a Las Vegas casino in 2017?

AHackers stole 10GB of data from a Las Vegas casino by infiltrating the network through a connected fish tank equipped with sensors for temperature, feeding, and cleaning.

QWhat is 'cryptojacking' and how can IoT devices be involved?

ACryptojacking is a type of cyber attack where hackers use compromised devices, such as IoT systems, to mine cryptocurrencies like Monero without the owner's knowledge, consuming electricity and sending the mining rewards to the attacker's wallet.

QWhat are some recommended measures to protect against IoT device hacks?

ARecommended measures include setting strong passwords for smart devices, avoiding default settings, using a separate guest network for IoT devices, disconnecting devices when not in use, and keeping software updated.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 6 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 6 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ERA

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Caldera (ERA) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Caldera (ERA) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Caldera (ERA)Después de comprar tu Caldera (ERA), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Caldera (ERA)Tradear fácilmente con Caldera (ERA) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

396 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.07.17Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ERA

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ERA (ERA).

活动图片