The Economist: In Asia, Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Financial Infrastructure

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-22Actualizado a 2026-02-22

Resumen

Stablecoins are rapidly emerging as a new financial infrastructure across Asia, driven by real-world needs for efficient and low-cost transactions. Despite cautious or strict regulatory stances in countries like India, cryptocurrency adoption continues to thrive. India, which imposes heavy taxes and transaction fees, still leads the global crypto adoption index, with inflows reaching approximately $338 billion from mid-2024 to 2025. A key application is cross-border remittances. With 24 million migrant workers in Southeast Asia, traditional remittance fees averaging 6.5% per $200 transfer pose a significant burden. Stablecoins, unlike volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, offer a stable, fast, and accessible alternative. From January to July last year, global stablecoin transfers exceeded $4 trillion. Businesses are also adopting stablecoins to streamline payments, reducing intermediaries, delays, and costs. Monthly stablecoin transactions between enterprises surged from under $100 million in early 2023 to over $6 billion by mid-2025. Additionally, Asia’s vast gig economy—over 210 million workers—benefits from instant salary settlements via stablecoins, bypassing traditional banking delays. However, the same features that benefit legitimate transactions—speed, low cost, and accessibility—also risk being exploited for illicit activities. The future of stablecoins in Asia will depend on how effectively regulators balance innovation with oversight. Success could reshape glo...

For everyone from freelance software developers in Lahore to domestic helpers in Manila, smartphones have become crypto banks. Instead of paying a day's wages in wire transfer fees, they can send and receive stablecoins at low cost and instantly.

This real demand explains why cryptocurrencies continue to thrive in Asia even as official attitudes remain cautious, even in countries with the toughest regulations like India. India imposes a 30% tax on crypto gains and deducts fees of up to 1% per transaction. According to data analytics firm Chainalysis, from mid-2024 to 2025, the scale of crypto fund inflows into India reached approximately $338 billion, ranking it first on the Global Crypto Adoption Index for the third consecutive year.

Nine of the top 20 countries on Chainalysis's Global Crypto Adoption Index are from Asia, including Pakistan (3rd), Vietnam, and developed economies like Japan and South Korea. Speculative trading remains popular, but the region's dominance mainly reflects a shift in the use of cryptocurrencies: it is no longer just a tool for speculation but has become a new type of financial infrastructure. "Cryptocurrency is solving real-world problems," says Chengyi Ong of Chainalysis.

Cross-border remittances are a core application. Southeast Asia has about 24 million migrant workers. World Bank data shows that in 2025, the average cost to send $200 was 6.5%. This is a heavy burden for migrant workers, especially in countries like the Philippines, where remittances account for 9% of GDP. Stablecoins are the solution; unlike Bitcoin, their price is hardly volatile. Ong says stablecoins are "becoming the backbone of crypto activity."

From January to July last year, the global volume of stablecoin transfers exceeded $4 trillion. Although this still represents a small share of the total annual cross-border payments, while highly volatile assets like Bitcoin grab global headlines, stablecoins are quietly taking on the role of real payments.

The advantages of stablecoins are also driving corporate adoption. In traditional cross-border payments, each participating bank adds fees, delays, markups, and compliance checks. A Vietnamese company paying a Thai supplier typically needs to go through a bank for currency exchange; stablecoin transactions settle faster with fewer intermediaries. According to crypto analytics firm Artemis, the monthly volume of inter-company stablecoin transactions soared from less than $100 million in early 2023 to over $6 billion by mid-2025.

Asia's vast freelance community is also bypassing traditional banks. The World Bank says the region has over 210 million gig economy workers, about half of the global total. Traditional payment systems often delay payments to drivers and delivery riders, while stablecoins enable instant settlement. Visa is testing a system that can send payments directly to users' stablecoin wallets. Pakistan has about 2 million freelancers and receives $38 billion in annual remittances. Many choose to receive payments in stablecoins and then convert them into local currency via exchanges or local merchants, with fees typically only 1%–3%, about half of traditional channels.

Whether stablecoins become legitimate financial infrastructure or a tool for fraud will largely depend on Asia. The very features that attract Filipino nurses for cross-border transfers (speed, low cost, no bank account needed) could also be exploited by criminal groups in Myanmar and Cambodia. Asia has the market size, real demand, and regulatory resolve to resolve this contradiction. If successful, stablecoins will reshape global capital flows; if they fail, cryptocurrencies will have found their long-awaited real-world use case, but an illegitimate one.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why is cryptocurrency thriving in Asia despite cautious official attitudes?

AIt is thriving due to real-world demand, such as the need for low-cost, instant cross-border remittances, which stablecoins provide as a solution. This utility is driving adoption even in countries with strict regulations like India.

QWhat is the primary use case for stablecoins in Asia that is driving their adoption, as mentioned in the text?

AThe core application is cross-border remittances. With around 24 million migrant workers in Southeast Asia, stablecoins offer a solution to the high costs (averaging 6.5% for sending $200) and delays associated with traditional money transfers.

QHow does the article contrast the use of stablecoins with traditional banking for corporate payments?

ATraditional cross-border corporate payments involve multiple intermediary banks, each adding fees, delays, markups, and compliance checks. In contrast, stablecoin transactions settle faster with fewer intermediaries, as evidenced by corporate stablecoin volume surging from under $100 million to over $6 billion monthly between 2023 and mid-2025.

QWhat advantage do stablecoins offer to Asia's vast gig economy workforce, according to The Economist?

AStablecoins enable instant settlement of payments for gig workers, such as drivers and delivery riders, who often face delays in receiving their earnings through traditional payment systems. This allows them to bypass traditional banks and receive funds directly into their wallets.

QWhat does the article suggest is the key factor that will determine whether stablecoins become legitimate financial infrastructure or a tool for fraud?

AThe outcome largely depends on Asia, which has the market size, real demand, and regulatory resolve to manage this duality. The same features that benefit legitimate users (speed, low cost, no bank account needed) can also be exploited by criminal groups. Success would mean reshaping global money flows; failure would mean a legitimate use case exists but operates outside the law.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is reportedly drafting a ban on importing new models of Chinese-made optical transceiver modules, with a potential implementation target of 2026. This "decoupling" move comes as Chinese firms, led by industry leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink, dominate the global optical module market with over 60% share, and hold an even larger position in the high-speed 800G and 1.6T segments critical for AI data centers. Market reactions were mixed: U.S. optical module stocks initially rose, while Chinese A-shares opened lower but largely recovered by the close. Analysis suggests a complete U.S. decoupling from Chinese modules faces significant hurdles. North American cloud giants (Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon) and NVIDIA have massive demand for high-speed modules, estimated at around 40 million units in 2026. U.S. manufacturers' combined monthly production capacity for these modules is less than one-fifth that of a single major Chinese player like Zhongji Innolight, which reported production of 23.76 million units in 2025. Chinese companies are heavily reliant on the U.S. market, with over 90% of revenue for top firms coming from overseas, primarily the U.S. However, they have begun mitigating risks by establishing assembly plants in Southeast Asia and Mexico. Industry observers note the final impact depends on whether any potential U.S. restrictions target specific companies or products based on origin. Past U.S. sanctions on Chinese tech firms have often spurred increased domestic R&D and market diversification. Despite initial stock volatility, shares of major Chinese optical module companies pared losses, indicating market belief in the sector's resilience and the practical difficulties of abruptly replacing Chinese supply.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

The competition in chip manufacturing equipment is no longer solely about who has the most advanced technology. While performance, yield, and cost remain key, U.S. export controls are adding a critical new dimension: long-term supply chain reliability. Major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix, despite having mature supply chains with leading American and European vendors, are reportedly evaluating etching equipment from China's AMEC for their Chinese factories. This move is not primarily about immediate replacement or AMEC's current capabilities. Instead, it's a risk mitigation strategy. Companies are concerned that future U.S. policies could disrupt their access to spare parts, software updates, and maintenance for existing equipment over its decade-long lifespan. For chipmakers investing billions in fabs with long planning cycles, this policy-induced uncertainty is a significant new risk. The U.S., through its controls, is inadvertently eroding the very reliability and certainty that were foundational strengths of its equipment suppliers. This creates a pivotal shift for Chinese semiconductor equipment. Previously seen largely as a "domestic replacement" option when foreign gear was unavailable, they are now being assessed as potential "contingency suppliers" by global players—even before a supply disruption occurs. This provides a crucial entry point for validation in real production lines, which is essential for iterative improvement. Chinese equipment, particularly in areas like etching, has progressed from prototypes to participating in mass production within China, gaining valuable experience. However, this does not signify full global competitiveness. Gaps remain in advanced lithography, metrology, and other key tools. The current evaluations are largely confined to foreign firms' China-based fabs, not their global procurement networks. The core change is in the decision-making framework. Efficiency-driven globalization favored single, optimal suppliers. An era of heightened geopolitical risk is forcing companies to value "replaceability." While technical prowess remains paramount, supply chain certainty is now being factored into a device's competitive equation. Ultimately, U.S. policies have not made Chinese equipment more advanced, but they have given global customers a compelling reason to start testing it. The competition has expanded: it's no longer just about who is more advanced, but also about who can be relied upon to stay.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

Circle's Q2 performance presents a seemingly contradictory picture: the transaction volume of its stablecoin USDC surged 151% year-over-year to $14.8 trillion, while its "Total Revenue & Reserve Revenue" grew by only 7% to $701 million. This discrepancy highlights the core of Circle's business model. Revenue is primarily driven not by transaction volume, but by the average amount of USDC in circulation and the yield generated from its reserves. Key points: 1. **Revenue Drivers:** Over 90% of revenue comes from "reserve income," which is a function of average USDC circulation (up 25% YoY) and the reserve yield (which fell by 66 basis points). The net effect was a mere ~5% increase in reserve income. 2. **Transaction vs. Revenue:** High transaction volume indicates robust usage of USDC for payments and settlements, but does not translate directly to revenue. It must first convert into a sustained, average circulating balance. 3. **Cost Structure:** After accounting for distribution and other costs, the metric "Revenue Less Direct Costs" (RLDC) grew faster than total revenue, with its margin improving. However, rising operating expenses (up 23% YoY) meant that Adjusted EBITDA growth was limited to 8%. 4. **New Initiatives:** Circle reported progress on new networks like the Circle Payments Network and upcoming products (Arc, Agent Stack), but these are currently measured by adoption metrics (e.g., transaction run-rate, number of services) rather than material revenue contribution this quarter. In summary, the financial results are determined by the interplay of USDC circulation, reserve yields, and cost structures, while high transaction volume signals underlying network strength that has not yet fully flowed through to the income statement.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Samsung China, Another Step Back

Samsung China Takes Another Step Back Samsung Electronics is further retreating from the Chinese consumer market. Following the exit of its home appliance business in May, its mobile phone division is now reportedly scaling down. Stores with monthly sales below 300,000 RMB are being closed in several cities. Data shows Samsung's smartphone market share in China has plummeted to 0.1% in Q2 2026, a stark contrast to its 22% global leadership. The decline is attributed to intense competition from domestic brands offering better value, higher specs (like faster charging), and superior localization in software and services. Samsung's premium pricing and less adapted One UI system have struggled against rivals like Huawei, Xiaomi, and Honor. This consumer electronics retreat coincides with Samsung's record-breaking semiconductor profits, driven by the AI boom. In Q2 2026, the chip division contributed nearly all operating profit, while the mobile and home appliance unit posted its first-ever operating loss. Internal dynamics, like the chip division charging market prices to the mobile unit, have increased cost pressures. Samsung's strategy now appears to be a focused retreat towards the ultra-premium segment in China, similar to its global push in high-end foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold8. The company is likely to retain only key stores in major cities to serve a niche, high-end clientele. While its deep semiconductor reserves offer a cushion, this shift away from mass-market consumer electronics reduces business diversification. The move is pragmatic but signifies a fundamental transformation; Samsung is ceding mass-market influence and betting heavily on its semiconductor strength and a narrowed premium product focus.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Samsung China, Another Step Back

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Helium, Naphtha, and Photoresist: The Three Critical Vulnerabilities of Semiconductor Fabs

The article "Helium, Naphtha, Photoresist: The Three Achilles' Heels of Semiconductor Fabs" analyzes a hypothetical 2026 supply crisis triggered by geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, focusing on three critical materials for semiconductor manufacturing: helium, naphtha, and photoresist. A key attack on a Qatari LNG facility and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz threaten the global supply of helium (a byproduct of LNG) and naphtha (a petroleum product). This creates a triple threat of shortages that could halt chip production. Helium is essential, particularly for precise wafer temperature control in dry etching processes; a shortage would cause an immediate "instant failure" in these steps. Naphtha is the foundational raw material for numerous equipment consumables and, crucially, for photoresist chemicals. Japan dominates the photoresist market, relying on a single key supplier for intermediates. The analysis shows the impacts would differ. The tiny fraction of global naphtha used for semiconductors (under 0.1%) makes securing supply for photoresist relatively easier. Helium is the greater vulnerability. Qatar supplies about one-third of the world's helium, exceeding the total annual consumption of the semiconductor industry (21-24% of global supply). While short-term buffers like corporate reserves, recycling, and prioritization (e.g., cutting balloon use first) can delay the crisis, helium cannot be stored long-term due to boil-off. Fabs typically hold only days to weeks of inventory. The consequences would be severe and tiered. Advanced logic nodes (e.g., 2nm, 3nm) using complex processes like GAA would be hit hardest, potentially stopping within three months. Mature nodes for automotive and power semiconductors would also eventually halt (within 6-12 months), which could be catastrophic for the auto industry due to stringent certification requirements. The crisis would unfold not as a sudden global stop, but through a sequence of allocation, severe price spikes, reduced output of low-margin products, and partial fab shutdowns by region and company if the shortage persists beyond a year.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Helium, Naphtha, and Photoresist: The Three Critical Vulnerabilities of Semiconductor Fabs

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片