The Door to Offshore Stablecoins Quietly Closes Amid the Vision of RMB Internationalization

比推Publicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

China's recent regulatory crackdown has effectively closed the door on offshore issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins, dealing a significant blow to Hong Kong’s ambitions to become a digital asset hub. The new rules, announced on February 7, explicitly prohibit domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas without approval, citing concerns over monetary sovereignty. This move dashes earlier market expectations of a policy thaw in China’s stance toward digital assets, particularly after PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng’s earlier comments about the yuan challenging dollar dominance. Industry observers note that the tightening was foreshadowed as early as August 2024, when Chinese authorities began restricting stablecoin-related research and promotional events. The latest policy removes any ambiguity around private yuan stablecoin issuance and reinforces capital control priorities. As a result, firms that had planned to apply for stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong—including Ant Group and JD.com—are now expected to focus solely on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins, if they proceed at all. Market data reflects the dampening effect: open interest in Bitcoin perpetual futures has fallen roughly 50% since October, and investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from U.S. Ethereum ETFs since last fall. The regulatory shift underscores the fundamental tension between China’s capital controls and the borderless nature of crypto innovation, forcing industry players to con...

Author: Suvashree Ghosh, Bloomberg

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

Editor's Note: Recently, the global cryptocurrency market has continued to slump, and China has once again tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, explicitly prohibiting the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins overseas without approval, directly impacting the progress of Hong Kong's digital asset hub construction. This article focuses on the market reaction and industry impact after the policy implementation, revealing the core contradiction between capital controls and crypto innovation. Against the backdrop of intensified industry reshuffling and accelerated capital withdrawal, the crypto sector is returning to pragmatic development. The regulatory boundaries and future direction are worth continuous attention.

November 26, 2025, a cryptocurrency exchange storefront in Hong Kong. Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg

Setback in the Digital Realm

Last year, an increasing number of crypto industry commentators believed that China's stance on the digital asset sector might be softening.

After People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng proposed the vision that the RMB has the potential to challenge the dominance of the US dollar, market talk of a "policy thaw" kept emerging.

But on February 7th, all these expectations came to an abrupt halt.

Amid the latest round of cryptocurrency crash, China tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and the tokenization of physical assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval. Officials stated this move was to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

Angela Ang, Head of APAC Policy and Strategic Partnerships at blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, said: "China's attitude towards stablecoins has been tentative at best and has cooled significantly in recent months."

She stated that the central bank's latest announcement "completely dashes any hope for the launch of an offshore RMB stablecoin in the short term — certainly not in Hong Kong, and most likely not elsewhere either."

For Hong Kong and its years-long goal of building a digital asset hub, this is a major setback.

In June last year, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, had said that, subject to regulatory requirements, the possibility of pegging Hong Kong stablecoins to the RMB was not ruled out. It is now widely believed that he will shut this door completely.

Surge in USD Stablecoin Supply During Trump Administration

Source: Artemis Analytics

As Angela Ang mentioned, signals of this regulatory tightening had already emerged.

As early as last August, China had required local securities firms and related institutions to stop publishing stablecoin research reports and hosting related promotional seminars to curb overheated market sentiment.

Patrick Tan, General Counsel at blockchain intelligence firm ChainArgos, said last week's policy announcement "removes the uncertainty hanging over the market regarding the private issuance of RMB stablecoins. Issuers now know exactly where the red lines are."

Entities applying for licenses can only focus on issuing stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.

Bloomberg News previously reported that up to 50 companies in Hong Kong planned to apply for stablecoin licenses last year, including tech giants Ant Group and JD.com. But according to an October report by the Financial Times, these companies were forced to suspend their stablecoin plans after intervention from Beijing.

Ant Group and JD.com did not respond to requests for comment.

As of this Tuesday, Hong Kong had issued licenses to 11 cryptocurrency exchanges, while approving 62 companies to conduct digital asset trading for clients. The list includes China-backed institutions such as CMB International Securities Limited, Guotai Junan Securities (Hong Kong) Limited, and Tinful Futures Limited.

But industry players worry that without access to the RMB, the entire setup might be in vain.

"The issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework, but always about whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control," Patrick Tan said, adding, "Capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible."

Market Data Continues to Weaken

Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Open Interest Continues to Decline

Source: Coinglass

Bitcoin perpetual futures open interest has failed to rebound since starting to decline last October, highlighting the lack of confidence supporting this rally. Data from Coinglass shows it has fallen by about 50% from the October high.

Capital Outflow: $3.3 Billion

Data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence shows that investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from US Ethereum ETFs since the crash in early October, with over $500 million withdrawn this year. Data shows that Ethereum ETF assets have fallen below $13 billion, the lowest level since last July.

Industry Perspectives

"The market is consolidating around what actually works. Even well-funded crypto-native VCs are pivoting heavily into fintech, stablecoin businesses, and prediction markets; it's hard to get attention for anything else."

— Santiago Roel Santos, Founder and CEO of crypto private equity firm Inversion

Venture capital funds in the crypto industry are shifting their focus to better-performing areas, such as stablecoin infrastructure, on-chain prediction markets, and expanding into related adjacent fields.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611508

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the key regulatory change announced by China regarding stablecoins on February 7th?

AChina tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and tokenization of real-world assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

QHow did Angela Ang from TRM Labs describe China's attitude towards stablecoins and the possibility of offshore RMB stablecoins?

AAngela Ang stated that China's attitude towards stablecoins was tentative at best and had cooled in recent months, and the announcement completely dashed any hopes of launching offshore RMB stablecoins in the near future, especially in Hong Kong and likely elsewhere.

QWhat impact did the new regulations have on Hong Kong's ambitions to become a digital asset hub?

AThe new regulations were a significant setback for Hong Kong's goal of becoming a digital asset hub, as they effectively closed the door on the possibility of issuing RMB-pegged stablecoins, forcing companies to focus only on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins.

QAccording to Patrick Tan from ChainArgos, what is the fundamental conflict between capital controls and stablecoin liberalization?

APatrick Tan stated that capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible, as the issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework but whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control.

QWhat trend did Santiago Roel Santos, CEO of Inversion, observe in crypto venture capital investments?

ASantiago Roel Santos noted that crypto-native venture capital firms are consolidating around areas that actually work, such as stablecoin infrastructure and on-chain prediction markets, and are expanding into adjacent areas, while other sectors struggle to attract attention.

Lecturas Relacionadas

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot