The Door to Offshore Stablecoins Quietly Closes Amid the Vision of RMB Internationalization

比推Publicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

China's recent regulatory crackdown has effectively closed the door on offshore issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins, dealing a significant blow to Hong Kong’s ambitions to become a digital asset hub. The new rules, announced on February 7, explicitly prohibit domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas without approval, citing concerns over monetary sovereignty. This move dashes earlier market expectations of a policy thaw in China’s stance toward digital assets, particularly after PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng’s earlier comments about the yuan challenging dollar dominance. Industry observers note that the tightening was foreshadowed as early as August 2024, when Chinese authorities began restricting stablecoin-related research and promotional events. The latest policy removes any ambiguity around private yuan stablecoin issuance and reinforces capital control priorities. As a result, firms that had planned to apply for stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong—including Ant Group and JD.com—are now expected to focus solely on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins, if they proceed at all. Market data reflects the dampening effect: open interest in Bitcoin perpetual futures has fallen roughly 50% since October, and investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from U.S. Ethereum ETFs since last fall. The regulatory shift underscores the fundamental tension between China’s capital controls and the borderless nature of crypto innovation, forcing industry players to con...

Author: Suvashree Ghosh, Bloomberg

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News


Editor's Note: Recently, the global cryptocurrency market has continued to slump, and China has once again tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, explicitly prohibiting the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins overseas without approval, directly impacting the progress of Hong Kong's digital asset hub construction. This article focuses on the market reaction and industry impact after the policy implementation, revealing the core contradiction between capital controls and crypto innovation. Against the backdrop of intensified industry reshuffling and accelerated capital withdrawal, the crypto sector is returning to pragmatic development. The regulatory boundaries and future direction are worth continuous attention.

November 26, 2025, a cryptocurrency exchange storefront in Hong Kong. Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg

Setback in the Digital Realm

Last year, an increasing number of crypto industry commentators believed that China's stance on the digital asset sector might be softening.

After People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng proposed the vision that the RMB has the potential to challenge the dominance of the US dollar, market talk of a "policy thaw" kept emerging.

But on February 7th, all these expectations came to an abrupt halt.

Amid the latest round of cryptocurrency crash, China tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and the tokenization of physical assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval. Officials stated this move was to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

Angela Ang, Head of APAC Policy and Strategic Partnerships at blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, said: "China's attitude towards stablecoins has been tentative at best and has cooled significantly in recent months."

She stated that the central bank's latest announcement "completely dashes any hope for the launch of an offshore RMB stablecoin in the short term — certainly not in Hong Kong, and most likely not elsewhere either."

For Hong Kong and its years-long goal of building a digital asset hub, this is a major setback.

In June last year, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, had said that, subject to regulatory requirements, the possibility of pegging Hong Kong stablecoins to the RMB was not ruled out. It is now widely believed that he will shut this door completely.

Surge in USD Stablecoin Supply During Trump Administration

Source: Artemis Analytics

As Angela Ang mentioned, signals of this regulatory tightening had already emerged.

As early as last August, China had required local securities firms and related institutions to stop publishing stablecoin research reports and hosting related promotional seminars to curb overheated market sentiment.

Patrick Tan, General Counsel at blockchain intelligence firm ChainArgos, said last week's policy announcement "removes the uncertainty hanging over the market regarding the private issuance of RMB stablecoins. Issuers now know exactly where the red lines are."

Entities applying for licenses can only focus on issuing stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.

Bloomberg News previously reported that up to 50 companies in Hong Kong planned to apply for stablecoin licenses last year, including tech giants Ant Group and JD.com. But according to an October report by the Financial Times, these companies were forced to suspend their stablecoin plans after intervention from Beijing.

Ant Group and JD.com did not respond to requests for comment.

As of this Tuesday, Hong Kong had issued licenses to 11 cryptocurrency exchanges, while approving 62 companies to conduct digital asset trading for clients. The list includes China-backed institutions such as CMB International Securities Limited, Guotai Junan Securities (Hong Kong) Limited, and Tinful Futures Limited.

But industry players worry that without access to the RMB, the entire setup might be in vain.

"The issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework, but always about whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control," Patrick Tan said, adding, "Capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible."

Market Data Continues to Weaken

Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Open Interest Continues to Decline

Source: Coinglass

Bitcoin perpetual futures open interest has failed to rebound since starting to decline last October, highlighting the lack of confidence supporting this rally. Data from Coinglass shows it has fallen by about 50% from the October high.

Capital Outflow: $3.3 Billion

Data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence shows that investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from US Ethereum ETFs since the crash in early October, with over $500 million withdrawn this year. Data shows that Ethereum ETF assets have fallen below $13 billion, the lowest level since last July.

Industry Perspectives

"The market is consolidating around what actually works. Even well-funded crypto-native VCs are pivoting heavily into fintech, stablecoin businesses, and prediction markets; it's hard to get attention for anything else."

— Santiago Roel Santos, Founder and CEO of crypto private equity firm Inversion

Venture capital funds in the crypto industry are shifting their focus to better-performing areas, such as stablecoin infrastructure, on-chain prediction markets, and expanding into related adjacent fields.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611508

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the key regulatory change announced by China regarding stablecoins on February 7th?

AChina tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and tokenization of real-world assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

QHow did Angela Ang from TRM Labs describe China's attitude towards stablecoins and the possibility of offshore RMB stablecoins?

AAngela Ang stated that China's attitude towards stablecoins was tentative at best and had cooled in recent months, and the announcement completely dashed any hopes of launching offshore RMB stablecoins in the near future, especially in Hong Kong and likely elsewhere.

QWhat impact did the new regulations have on Hong Kong's ambitions to become a digital asset hub?

AThe new regulations were a significant setback for Hong Kong's goal of becoming a digital asset hub, as they effectively closed the door on the possibility of issuing RMB-pegged stablecoins, forcing companies to focus only on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins.

QAccording to Patrick Tan from ChainArgos, what is the fundamental conflict between capital controls and stablecoin liberalization?

APatrick Tan stated that capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible, as the issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework but whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control.

QWhat trend did Santiago Roel Santos, CEO of Inversion, observe in crypto venture capital investments?

ASantiago Roel Santos noted that crypto-native venture capital firms are consolidating around areas that actually work, such as stablecoin infrastructure and on-chain prediction markets, and are expanding into adjacent areas, while other sectors struggle to attract attention.

Lecturas Relacionadas

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Hace 2 min(s)

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Hace 2 min(s)

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片