Tether’s Mega-Freeze: $344M USDT Locked Down In Major Operation With US Authorities

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-04-24Actualizado a 2026-04-24

Resumen

Tether has frozen $344 million in USDT held in two Tron wallets at the request of US authorities, including OFAC, after the wallets were linked to sanctions evasion and criminal activity. The company emphasized its routine cooperation with global law enforcement, having supported over 2,300 cases and frozen more than $4.4 billion in assets to date. This action contrasts with increased scrutiny on rival stablecoin issuer Circle, which faces a lawsuit over its alleged failure to promptly freeze $280 million stolen in the Drift Protocol hack. Tether also announced a collaboration with Drift Protocol to support recovery efforts with nearly $150 million in backing.

Crypto giant Tether disclosed that it has supported the US government in freezing $344 million in USDT held in two Tron wallets, following a request from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US law enforcement.

Tether’s Latest Crackdown

According to Tether’s Thursday disclosure, the freeze came after authorities allegedly identified the wallets as linked to sanctions evasion, criminal networks, or other illicit activity.

The company framed this as part of its routine response to lawful requests from governments in the US and abroad, noting that it works with more than 340 law enforcement agencies across 65 countries.

In a statement, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino emphasized that USDT should not be used as a “safe haven” for wrongdoing. He argued that when Tether sees credible links to sanctioned entities or criminal networks, it acts quickly and decisively.

Beyond this specific freeze, Tether said its broader cooperation has supported more than 2,300 cases globally, including over 1,200 tied to US law enforcement.

The company added that those efforts have contributed to the freezing of more than $4.4 billion in assets, including over $2.1 billion linked to US authorities.

Circle Under Fire

Tether’s move comes as the industry’s second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle (CRCL), which issues USDC, has faced increased scrutiny. The firm has faced criticism for what some describe as a lack of similarly prompt actions.

The issue was highlighted after the Drift Protocol hack in early April, when reports alleged that in several widely documented thefts and hacks, the issuer either delayed freezing responses or did not freeze funds at all—allowing attackers to move large sums across blockchains and convert them into other assets.

That controversy is now tied to legal action. NewsBTC reported last week that Circle is facing a fresh lawsuit in Massachusetts connected to the $280 million Drift Protocol hack.

The complaint alleges that Circle did not freeze stolen funds even though it allegedly had both the technical capability and contractual authority to do so.

The allegations include that attackers were able to offload up to $230 million onto the Ethereum blockchain by leveraging Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), according to the lawsuit’s framing.

Plaintiffs say this ability to transfer stablecoin-related assets during the period when funds were being moved is central to why they believe Circle should have prevented the transfers.

While Circle faces accusations over the Drift incident, Tether announced a strategic collaboration with the Drift Protocol. Tether said the effort is intended to support user recovery and help relaunch the Drift platform.

The collaboration, Tether said, creates a structured recovery plan supported by up to nearly $150 million in combined backing, including up to $127.5 million from the company.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.58 trillion as of Thursday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the amount of USDT frozen by Tether in collaboration with US authorities, and on which blockchain were the wallets located?

ATether froze $344 million in USDT held in two wallets on the Tron blockchain.

QWhich US government agency requested the freeze of the assets, and what was the alleged reason for the action?

AThe freeze was requested by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US law enforcement, as the wallets were allegedly linked to sanctions evasion, criminal networks, or other illicit activity.

QHow does Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino characterize the company's stance on the use of USDT for illicit activities?

APaolo Ardoino emphasized that USDT should not be used as a 'safe haven' for wrongdoing and stated that Tether acts quickly and decisively when it sees credible links to sanctioned entities or criminal networks.

QWhat controversy is the stablecoin issuer Circle facing, as mentioned in the article?

ACircle is facing a lawsuit in Massachusetts related to the $280 million Drift Protocol hack, with allegations that it did not freeze stolen funds despite having the technical capability and contractual authority to do so.

QWhat is the nature of Tether's newly announced collaboration with the Drift Protocol?

ATether announced a strategic collaboration with the Drift Protocol to support user recovery and help relaunch the platform, creating a structured recovery plan backed by up to nearly $150 million, including up to $127.5 million from Tether.

Lecturas Relacionadas

UNI Activates Fee Switch: Uniswap Completes Commercial Debut, Faces First Test in September

Uniswap's Fee Switch activation on V4 has driven a surge in protocol revenue, with daily income jumping from $118,000 to $318,000. The newly launched Robinhood Chain has become the primary contributor, accounting for over 52% of total revenue, largely fueled by meme coin trading. This revenue fuels a new tokenomic "flywheel": fees accumulate in a pool, incentivizing arbitrageurs to buy and burn UNI tokens, creating deflationary pressure and boosting the token's price. However, concerns loom beneath the surface. Uniswap's revenue is now highly concentrated and dependent on the speculative, volatile activity on Robinhood Chain, which is currently subsidized by free gas fees. This subsidy is set to expire in late September, posing a significant test for sustained transaction volume and, consequently, protocol revenue. Furthermore, UNI's high valuation faces pressure if growth expectations aren't met. Debate also centers on the Fee Switch's impact. While Uniswap founder Hayden Adams clarified that the protocol fee is an "add-on" for traders and does not cut into Liquidity Providers' (LPs) existing share, questions remain about whether higher overall trading costs could indirectly reduce volume and LP earnings over time. Despite these challenges, Uniswap's Fee Switch marks a major step in protocol monetization, with its long-term success hinging on cultivating more sustainable usage beyond speculative trading.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

UNI Activates Fee Switch: Uniswap Completes Commercial Debut, Faces First Test in September

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片