Tether Urged To Transfer $344M In Frozen USDT To Terror Victims

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-05-16Actualizado a 2026-05-16

Resumen

A US federal court in Manhattan is being asked to order Tether to transfer $344 million in frozen USDT to victims of Iran-linked terrorist attacks. The plaintiffs, including a Jerusalem family affected by a 1997 Hamas bombing, hold unpaid court judgments against Iran. They target two Tron blockchain wallets, frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury's OFAC as linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Their lawsuit argues that because Tether, as a centralized issuer, can freeze wallets, it can also be compelled by court order to move the equivalent funds to satisfy the judgments. This case could set a significant legal precedent for centralized stablecoin issuers and is part of a broader legal campaign targeting frozen crypto assets linked to sanctioned entities.

A Jerusalem family that lost relatives in a 1997 Hamas suicide bombing is among the plaintiffs pushing a US federal court to order Tether to hand over hundreds of millions in frozen digital currency.

The case, filed in Manhattan, could set a significant legal precedent for how courts treat centralized stablecoin issuers.

A Decades-Old Debt

The plaintiffs are survivors and family members of victims from Iran-linked terrorist attacks. They hold court judgments against Iran that were awarded years ago — judgments that have never been paid.

Now they are targeting a pile of frozen cryptocurrency as a way to collect what they are owed.

Attorney Charles Gerstein filed the lawsuit Thursday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Filing against Tether submitted by Attorney Charles Gerstein.

His clients say they have a legal claim to two Tron blockchain wallet addresses holding roughly 344 million USDT. Those wallets were frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which identified them as linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The plaintiffs are not asking Tether to simply release those specific wallets. According to reports, they want a court order directing Tether to transfer an equivalent amount of USDT to their legal team’s wallet address.

Why Tether Can Be Compelled

Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, USDT is controlled by a central company. Tether can freeze wallets, block transactions, and move funds when ordered to do so. That centralized structure is at the heart of Gerstein’s legal argument.

Because a prior order already froze the wallets — something only possible because Tether has direct operational control — he contends the company can also be ordered to move the funds.

BTCUSD trading at $78,115 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

The ownership question, he argues, is already largely settled: OFAC has already declared the wallets to be IRGC-controlled assets, which clears a path for seizure under US terrorism statutes.

Broader Legal Campaign

This is not Gerstein’s only case of this kind. Based on reports, he has filed similar actions involving North Korea-linked cyber operations against the Arbitrum platform. He is also handling a separate case involving Railgun DAO, a privacy-focused crypto protocol.

The Manhattan filing is part of what appears to be a coordinated legal push to test whether courts can compel crypto platforms with centralized control to act on frozen assets held in sanctioned wallets.

Featured image from CEPA, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the plaintiffs' primary demand to Tether in this case?

AThe plaintiffs are asking the US federal court to order Tether to transfer approximately $344 million worth of frozen USDT (an equivalent amount to the funds in two sanctioned wallet addresses) to a wallet address controlled by their legal team.

QWhat is the legal basis for Attorney Charles Gerstein's argument that Tether can be compelled to move the funds?

AThe argument hinges on Tether's centralized control over USDT. Gerstein contends that because Tether can and has frozen the specific wallets (as ordered by OFAC), demonstrating direct operational control, the company can similarly be ordered by a court to move the funds.

QWhat entity froze the Tron blockchain wallets containing the 344 million USDT, and why were they frozen?

AThe wallets were frozen earlier this year by the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which identified them as assets linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

QWho are the plaintiffs in this lawsuit against Tether?

AThe plaintiffs are survivors and family members of victims from Iran-linked terrorist attacks, including a Jerusalem family that lost relatives in a 1997 Hamas suicide bombing. They hold unpaid court judgments against Iran.

QWhat potential legal significance does this case hold beyond the immediate dispute?

AThe case could set a significant legal precedent for how US courts treat centralized stablecoin issuers, testing whether courts can compel such platforms to act on frozen assets held in wallets linked to sanctioned entities under terrorism statutes.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

**"Spicy Commentary": Three Tales of Crypto's Wild Week** This week's "Spicy Commentary" column highlights three dramatic stories from the cryptocurrency world. First, **MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor** addressed the controversy over his company potentially selling Bitcoin. At the BTC Prague event, he clarified, "I never said the company can't sell Bitcoin. I told *you* never to sell *your* Bitcoin." This "do as I say, not as I do" stance was criticized by netizens as peak linguistic gymnastics, noting a history of him previously stating the company would "never" sell. Second, a **bizarre fraud case** emerged from Beijing. A 60-year-old woman, obsessed with getting rich from crypto but unwilling to risk her own savings, posed online as the 20-something "god-daughter" of a high-ranking official. She catfished a young man, convincing him to give her over 200,000 yuan for fabricated emergencies. She then invested all the stolen money into cryptocurrency with 10x leverage, only to lose everything in a market crash. The woman was sentenced to four years in prison for fraud. Finally, a **sobering trader's tale** surfaced on Reddit. A user posted "Tale of a crypto trader," confessing their net worth had plummeted from a peak of $45 million to roughly $17,200, primarily due to holding meme coins too long. The post, described as a crypto "book of confessions," sparked reactions ranging from sympathy to critique about greed, poor risk management, and the perils of treating meme coins as long-term investments instead of taking profits. The column concludes that this week featured masterful rhetoric, elaborate scams, and extreme financial volatility, stitching together another chapter in crypto's unpredictable theater.

Foresight NewsHace 3 hora(s)

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

Foresight NewsHace 3 hora(s)

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

Trembling, Humans: AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint Yes, AI is still rapidly accelerating. While deep learning seemed to stall quickly in its early years, large models after years of development show no sign of hitting their ceiling. At the Zhiyuan Conference 2026, the focus is on enabling AI to move from the digital world into the physical world. Scaling Law remains effective, continuing to drive advancements in both large language models and multimodal models. The industry is now entering a phase of pursuing World Models, though unresolved technical paths and data issues mean this exploration may take 3-5 more years. Concurrently, breakthroughs in Agents are accelerating AI's real-world application in fields like healthcare and meetings. Making Agents truly useful requires key hardware-software co-design, evident from the strong presence of chip vendors at the conference. We stand at a new historical threshold where AI is becoming a foundational force reshaping the world. The first day of the conference highlighted AI's evolution from "knowing how to chat" to "knowing how to work." Scaling Law persists, World Models are the next key battleground, and Agents are transitioning from usable to好用 (user-friendly). Scaling Law is not ending but diversifying. New models like Anthropic's Fable 5 demonstrate scaling through parameter size, synthetic data, and reinforcement learning. Advancements in AI Coding and Agent deployment are enabling a trend of AI self-evolution, potentially allowing AI to take over digital world iterations. World Models represent the next frontier for large models extending into the physical realm, but no current model is truly impressive at solving real-world problems. Technical consensus is lacking, with debates on data sources (video, simulation, real-world). Different approaches are emerging: language-centric, pixel-centric, 3D-structure-centric, and visual-representation-centric models. Zhiyuan Institute is exploring a fifth path: unified latent space modeling fusing language and visual representations, and introduced its own under-development World Model, Physis-v0.1. On the product side, Agents are key to bringing AI into daily life. Since 2025, the "Year of the Agent," products have become more proactive and capable of complex tasks. Zhiyuan showcased four vertical Agents for cardiac diagnosis, autonomous research, meeting summarization, and protein risk discovery. However, technical challenges remain, particularly in context engineering like memory and orchestration. "Harness" – the engineering framework around an Agent – is crucial for maximizing its capabilities by clarifying intent, designing workflows, and incorporating validation and feedback. In summary, AI's breakneck pace continues on multiple fronts: foundational model scaling, the ambitious pursuit of World Models for physical understanding, and the ongoing refinement of practical Agents. The journey from capable to truly reliable and useful AI systems is well underway.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

Elon Musk becomes the world's first trillionaire, driven by SpaceX's IPO valuing the company at $1.77 trillion. However, his vast wealth is largely illiquid: he holds over 85% voting control, likely through super-voting shares that are subject to lock-ups and selling restrictions. While his net worth surpasses $1 trillion across SpaceX, Tesla, and private holdings, only a tiny fraction (potentially under 2% annually) could be converted to cash without jeopardizing control and market confidence. SpaceX's IPO also creates paper millionaires for roughly 4,400 employees, but their holdings face lock-up periods, exercise costs, and taxes, delaying and reducing actual cash proceeds. Only 4.2% of total shares are initially available for public trading, making the stock price highly sensitive to limited net buying or selling pressure. A major test will come when lock-ups expire for the remaining 96% of shares. The article contrasts SpaceX's wealth distribution with potential AI IPOs. Anthropic and OpenAI could generate employee wealth pools 20 times larger than SpaceX's in paper value, due to their higher valuations relative to revenue and potentially more distributed ownership. However, sustaining those high price-to-sales multiples post-IPO is uncertain. A key financial puzzle for SpaceX investors is its xAI unit. While it has locked in an estimated $26 billion in annual compute revenue from clients like Anthropic and Google, the unit reported a $6.4 billion loss in 2025. More critically, estimated annual capital expenditures of ~$30.8 billion exceed that revenue. The long-term viability of SpaceX's AI narrative hinges on whether this compute income can eventually cover the unit's massive ongoing investments and losses.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片