Tether Market Cap Slides Toward Second Straight Monthly Decline

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-25Actualizado a 2026-02-25

Resumen

Tether's market capitalization has declined for the second consecutive month, falling from over $186 billion in January to around $183 billion in February. This represents one of the most significant supply reductions since the 2022 crypto market turmoil. As USDT supply decreases, liquidity for trading may also diminish. However, capital appears to be rotating within the stablecoin sector rather than exiting, as competitors like USD Coin have seen growth. The total stablecoin market cap remains near $307 billion. Despite the drop, USDT continues to trade near its $1 peg, indicating sustained market confidence. Analysts are monitoring wallet transactions to assess if supply will rebound in the coming months.

Tether has observed another fall in the market capitalization of its major stablecoin, Tether, for the second consecutive month. It is noted that the market capitalization of USDT reduced from above $186 billion in January to close to $183 billion in February. This reduction is one of the most prominent in supply. This is since the turmoil that happened after the crash in the crypto market in 2022. The supply of stablecoins is considered a representation of the liquidity level in the crypto market.

USDT is a key player in the crypto market due to the fact that investors often use it as a base pair for spot and derivative trades. As the circulating supply reduces, the liquidity available for trading may reduce as well. Analysts have noted that the month of February has seen a reduction of $1.5 billion in the supply of USDT. This is a sequential decrease that has been seen after a similar reduction in the month of January. And this has drawn attention to the dynamics of stablecoin supply.

Capital Rotation Indicates Changes in Stablecoin Preferences

Although the supply of USDT has been decreasing, other stablecoins have demonstrated relative growth. The market capitalization of USD Coin has increased, approaching a value of $75 billion in February. The total market capitalization of the stablecoin sector is currently close to $307 billion, suggesting that capital seems to rotate rather than leave the sector. Experts believe that changes in regulations and platform policies may be responsible for the changes in these allocation preferences.

Stablecoins are a liquidity channel between fiat currency and blockchain platforms. They enable trading, lending, and decentralized financial services. When the largest market for stablecoins reduces, market participants start analyzing whether the demand for risk assets could experience a temporary slowdown. Although the supply of USDT has been decreasing, it is still trading close to its one-dollar value, suggesting that market participants remain confident in its price stability. Market participants are currently analyzing wallet transactions and exchange balances to determine whether the growth of supply might resume in the coming months.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Peter Schiff Questions Bitcoin Rally Ahead of SOTU Address

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the trend in Tether's market capitalization for the past two months?

ATether's market capitalization has been declining for two consecutive months, falling from over $186 billion in January to close to $183 billion in February.

QWhy is the supply of stablecoins like USDT considered significant for the crypto market?

AThe supply of stablecoins is considered a representation of the liquidity level in the crypto market, as they are widely used as a base pair for spot and derivative trades.

QHow did other major stablecoins perform while USDT's supply was decreasing?

AWhile USDT's supply decreased, other stablecoins like USD Coin demonstrated growth, with its market capitalization approaching $75 billion in February, indicating a capital rotation within the sector.

QWhat is the total market capitalization of the stablecoin sector mentioned in the article?

AThe total market capitalization of the stablecoin sector is currently close to $307 billion.

QDespite the supply decrease, what does USDT's trading price near $1 indicate?

AUSDT is still trading close to its one-dollar value, suggesting that market participants remain confident in its price stability.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报Hace 15 min(s)

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报Hace 15 min(s)

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH worth more than $10.5 billion, is nearing its goal to control 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply. Despite the company's recent purchase of 26,497 ETH (valued at roughly $52 million), Ethereum's price has struggled, trading around $2,000 and even declining recently. Bitmine's head, Tom Lee, argues that ETH prices are not reflecting the strengthening fundamentals of the Ethereum network, attributing the lag to being in the early stages of a "crypto spring." He cites long-term trends like AI commerce and tokenization as reasons for Ethereum's enduring importance. Bitmine's strategy treats Ether as a long-term reserve asset, not a short-term trade, explaining why the massive accumulation hasn't yet triggered a corresponding price rally.

bitcoinistHace 35 min(s)

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

bitcoinistHace 35 min(s)

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros