Telegram’s Lighter integration fuels HYPE – Breakout toward $42 IF…

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-04-07Actualizado a 2026-04-07

Resumen

Telegram's integration with Lighter brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE), but a significant whale moved against the trend by selling 12.2K HYPE ($449.1K) and placing an additional 10.4K HYPE sell order ($386K), while withdrawing $1.26M in USDC. This activity, following the whale's exit from large long positions, created a divergence between the bullish narrative and capital flow. HYPE maintained a bullish flag pattern, trading between support at $35.37 and resistance at $38. While the structure remained intact with buyers stepping in at lower levels, failure to break $38 indicated hesitation. A breakout toward $42.10 was possible if resistance was overcome. The RSI showed weakening buying pressure, stabilizing near 49.18. Short liquidations dominated recent activity ($26.58K vs. $4.14K long liquidations), supporting upward pressure and short squeezes. However, the funding rate, though positive at 0.0008%, was declining, signaling reduced conviction among longs. This aligned with whale distribution, suggesting weakened confidence. The overall setup remained constructive but faced headwinds near resistance, leaving a breakout uncertain.

Telegram’s Lighter integration drew attention to Hyperliquid. However, a large whale moved in the opposite direction immediately.

Source: Onchain Lens

The whale dumped 12.2K HYPE worth $449.1K and placed another 10.4K HYPE sell order worth $386K. He also withdrew $1.26M in USDC, reducing exposure.

That move followed his exit from multi-million dollar HYPE longs after the 3rd of April. His $1.72M+ lifetime PnL suggested calculated positioning.

However, this created a divergence between the bullish narrative and capital flow. That shift raised concerns about distribution in strength.

Bullish flag holds as HYPE compresses

HYPE maintained a bullish flag after rallying toward $42.10. Price pulled back into a descending channel, forming the structure.

The asset traded between $35.37 support and $38 resistance, showing controlled consolidation. Each lower-bound retest attracted buyers, preserving structure.

However, Hyperliquid [HYPE] failed to reclaim $38 decisively, signaling hesitation near resistance. This left the market waiting for a breakout.

A move toward $42.10 remained likely if resistance broke.

RSI stabilized near 49.18, with its moving average near 51.50. The indicator cooled after nearing overbought levels around 70.

Lower highs on RSI suggested weakening buying pressure.

Source: TradingView

HYPE short liquidations dominate recent activity

The Liquidation chart had shown that short liquidations had outweighed long liquidations, reinforcing upward pressure in the market.

Recent figures had recorded $26.58K in short liquidations compared to $4.14K in long liquidations.

This imbalance had indicated that bearish positions had been forced out as the price held above key levels.

As a result, the market had experienced localized short squeezes, which had supported price stability within the flag.

However, the absence of large liquidation spikes had suggested controlled volatility rather than aggressive expansion.

Liquidity had continued to build around the $35.37 support and $38 resistance zones, leaving the market positioned for a decisive move.

Source: CoinGlass

Funding stays positive but weakens

The OI-Weighted Funding Rate remained positive at 0.0008% on the 7th of April, confirming long dominance.

However, Funding Rates trended downward, signaling weakening conviction among longs.

Traders showed less willingness to pay premiums, reflecting caution near resistance.

That decline contrasted with a bullish price structure and short liquidations. It also aligned with whale-selling activity.

This suggested confidence had not fully backed further upside.

Source: CoinGlass

Can HYPE sustain a breakout?

HYPE had retained a bullish structure, supported by short liquidations and stable price action. However, declining funding rates and whale distribution had introduced clear hesitation.

The setup had remained constructive, yet conviction had weakened near resistance.

A breakout had remained possible, though underlying signals had suggested that upside strength might face immediate pressure.


Final Summary

  • HYPE held a bullish flag between $35.37 support and $38 resistance, showing controlled consolidation rather than a breakdown.
  • Repeated rejection near $38 indicated hesitation, with buyers unable to confirm a breakout yet.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the impact of Telegram's Lighter integration on Hyperliquid (HYPE)?

ATelegram's Lighter integration drew significant attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE), creating a bullish narrative for the asset.

QWhat significant trading activity did a large whale perform that contradicted the bullish sentiment?

AA large whale dumped 12.2K HYPE worth $449.1K, placed a 10.4K HYPE sell order worth $386K, and withdrew $1.26M in USDC, reducing their exposure and moving in the opposite direction of the bullish trend.

QWhat is the key price range HYPE was trading within, and what does it signify?

AHYPE was trading between the $35.37 support level and the $38 resistance level, which signifies a period of controlled consolidation within a bullish flag pattern.

QWhat did the liquidation data reveal about market pressure for HYPE?

AThe liquidation data showed that short liquidations ($26.58K) significantly outweighed long liquidations ($4.14K), indicating upward pressure as bearish positions were being forced out, supporting price stability.

QWhat was the trend of the Funding Rate, and what does it suggest about trader sentiment?

AThe OI-Weighted Funding Rate remained positive but was trending downward, signaling that while long positions were still dominant, conviction among longs was weakening and traders were showing caution near the resistance level.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar TON

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar The Open Network (TON) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar The Open Network (TON) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu The Open Network (TON)Después de comprar tu The Open Network (TON), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear The Open Network (TON)Tradear fácilmente con The Open Network (TON) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

511 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar TON

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de TON (TON).

活动图片