Telegram Moves Toward Built-In Crypto Payments With TON Pay Launch

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-09Actualizado a 2026-02-09

Resumen

TON Foundation has launched TON Pay, a new payments SDK designed to integrate crypto payments into Telegram’s ecosystem. The wallet-agnostic system enables merchants and Mini App developers to accept Toncoin and Tether’s USDt, aiming to reduce friction in wallet management, settlement, and checkout flows. It targets sub-second transaction times with fees under one cent on average, potentially reaching Telegram’s 1.1 billion monthly users. The system aims to mainstream crypto payments within chats by simplifying adoption. Future updates may include subscriptions and gasless transactions. TON Pay enters a competitive landscape alongside platforms like X and Coinbase’s Base, leveraging Telegram’s vast user base and ease of integration. The open, permissionless network operates under Telegram’s platform policies, with plans to expand beyond Mini Apps and support broader Web3 strategies.

TON Foundation has rolled out TON Pay, a new payments SDK designed to incorporate crypto payments into the Telegram ecosystem. TON Pay’s aim is to turn Telegram into a crypto payment system for Toncoin and other cryptocurrencies. TON Pay is a wallet-agnostic payment system for merchants and Mini App developers. It enables developers to accept Toncoin and Tether’s USDt currencies within Telegram’s Mini Apps.

TON Pay aims to cut down on friction involving wallet management, settlement, and checkout flows. Per the TON Foundation, this SDK makes integration with Telegram Mini Apps simple for everyday commerce. The system aims for sub-second transaction times and fees below one cent on average. TON Pay intends to cover more than 1.1 billion monthly active users on Telegram. The widespread user base of Telegram might enable crypto payments to become mainstream inside chats. To be sure, the project seeks to reduce the barrier to adoption by placing checkout functions directly into the messaging app.

Friction points related to the frequent user, complicated checkouts, and gas fees could be reduced. TON Pay is designed to feel native within Telegram and will support optional merchant tools such as analytics and advanced wallets that are currently in development. For now, TON Pay operates within Telegram Mini Apps, with broader expansion planned. Future updates will probably add support for subscriptions and gasless transactions.

TON Pay Enters Competitive Integrated Payments Landscape

TON Pay’s launch comes at a time when several major platforms are seeking to incorporate crypto payments. Elon Musk’s X has announced a plan for its X Money financial services. Coinbase’s Base is a new app combining social elements with payments and trading. Telegram’s ecosystem also has the ability to incorporate TON Pay to compete with other “everything apps.” TON Pay’s main advantage for merchants will be the ease of development for the ecosystem. There are also concerns by some people about the skepticism surrounding TON, given their previous connections with Telegram.

The TON Foundation argues that, by definition, this network is open and permissionless. Merchants who use the TON Pay system must abide by Telegram’s platform policies. The merchant rules will likely change as the SDK develops. TON Pay’s malleable structure could potentially facilitate compatibility between crypto and fiat payments. Renowned analysts have great expectations that integrated checkouts can potentially accelerate on-chain spend. The proposed rollout strategies include web development beyond Telegram Mini Apps. The rollout of TON Pay can be related to Telegram’s strategy for Web3. It is a wallet-agnostic system aiming to simplify various crypto transactions. TON Pay has originated from Telegram’s potential for developing into a digital payments system.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Says ETH-Backed Algorithmic Stablecoins Qualify as ‘True DeFi’

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of TON Pay's new payments SDK?

AThe main purpose of TON Pay is to incorporate crypto payments into the Telegram ecosystem, turning it into a payment system for Toncoin and other cryptocurrencies, and enabling developers to accept these currencies within Telegram's Mini Apps.

QWhat are some key features and goals of the TON Pay system?

ATON Pay aims to reduce friction in wallet management, settlement, and checkout flows. It targets sub-second transaction times, fees below one cent on average, and plans to serve Telegram's over 1.1 billion monthly active users. It also supports optional merchant tools like analytics and advanced wallets.

QHow does TON Pay fit into the broader competitive landscape of integrated payments?

ATON Pay enters a competitive field where platforms like Elon Musk's X (with X Money) and Coinbase's Base are also incorporating crypto payments. Its main advantage is the ease of development within the Telegram ecosystem, positioning it to compete with other 'everything apps'.

QWhat potential benefits does TON Pay offer for reducing barriers to crypto adoption?

ATON Pay seeks to reduce adoption barriers by integrating checkout functions directly into the Telegram messaging app, simplifying the user experience, and potentially reducing issues like complicated checkouts and gas fees.

QWhat future developments are mentioned for TON Pay beyond its current capabilities?

AFuture updates for TON Pay are planned to include support for subscriptions and gasless transactions, with a broader expansion beyond Telegram Mini Apps into web development, aligning with Telegram's Web3 strategy.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 37 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 37 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot