Telegram Financial Report Revealed: Main Revenue Actually Comes from Selling Coins!

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-07Actualizado a 2026-01-07

Resumen

Telegram's unaudited financial report for the first half of 2025 reveals a 65% year-on-year revenue increase to $870 million, up from $525 million in the same period of 2024. However, the company reported a net loss of over $220 million, compared to a net profit of $334 million a year earlier. This loss is attributed to a significant decline in the value of its Toncoin (TON) holdings, leading to asset write-downs. Despite its growth in users—now exceeding 900 million monthly active users—Telegram's financial performance is heavily tied to TON. Approximately one-third of its revenue, around $300 million, comes from TON-related exclusive agreements, including wallet integration and payment services. Moreover, Telegram has sold over $450 million worth of TON in 2025 alone, accounting for about 10% of TON's market capitalization, making cryptocurrency sales a major revenue stream. Telegram's planned IPO has been delayed due to ongoing legal investigations involving its founder, Pavel Durov, in France. The company secured $1.7 billion in convertible bonds from institutions like BlackRock and Mubadala in May 2025. Originally launched in 2017, TON faced regulatory challenges from the SEC but was revived as a community-led blockchain. Despite initial growth, TON's ecosystem has struggled recently, with many projects declining significantly in value.

Author: C Labs Crypto Watch

According to unaudited financial reports disclosed by the Financial Times, Telegram, known as the "dark version of WeChat," achieved revenue of $870 million in the first half of 2025, a 65% year-over-year increase, showing a significant leap compared to $525 million in the same period of 2024.

From a "revenue growth" perspective, this is a quite impressive growth curve.

However, the problem lies in the profit side. Telegram recorded a net loss of over $220 million in the first half of 2025, compared to a net profit of $334 million in the same period last year.

The loss did not stem from a collapse in the main business but was due to a significant decline in the value of Toncoin (TON) held by the company in 2025, leading to a write-down of related assets.

PART 01: Telegram's Development History

Telegram was founded in 2013 and is one of the world's most important instant messaging platforms.

As of 2025, Telegram's monthly active users have exceeded 900 million, covering Europe, the Middle East, South America, and emerging markets, making it one of the fastest-growing social applications globally.

For crypto users, Telegram has become the de facto "public discussion layer" of the crypto industry: a large number of exchange announcements, project governance, airdrop information, OTC trading, and on-chain communities use Telegram as their core platform.

This gives it the dual attributes of a social platform and financial information infrastructure.

PART 02: IPO Plans Shelved

Although Telegram announced preparations for an IPO, the practical obstacle is that its founder, Pavel Durov, is still under investigation in France (Breaking! TG Founder Arrested, TON Price Plummets).

Telegram has clearly stated that it will not proceed with the listing until related compliance issues are clearer.

Fortunately, Telegram is not short of capital support. In May 2025, the company completed a $1.7 billion convertible bond financing, backed by top institutions including BlackRock and Mubadala.

PART 03: Telegram's Relationship with TON

The relationship between Telegram and TON is also complex.

In 2017, Telegram launched the blockchain project TON (Telegram Open Network), aiming to embed a payment system into the messaging app, and raised approximately $1.7 billion in 2018. However, in 2019, it was forced to halt the project after the SEC deemed it an unregistered securities offering. Telegram settled with regulators and exited the project in 2020.

Subsequently, TON was reborn as a community public chain, and Telegram re-engaged with it in a "non-official but deeply integrated" manner, which saw significant growth in 2024.

Unfortunately, in 2024, after founder Durov was arrested, the rapid progress came to an abrupt halt (TON Chain Crashed? No New Blocks for a Long Time).

Most of the once-popular TON ecosystem projects have now faded, with token prices generally down over 70%:

However, according to the latest financial report, the relationship between Telegram and TON has already gone beyond "official support for a public chain."

Significant Proportion of TON-Related Revenue

The financials show that about one-third of Telegram's revenue (approximately $300 million) comes from exclusive agreements related to TON, including wallet integration, payment functions, and ecosystem collaboration.

At the same time, Telegram is also one of the most significant sources of TON circulation, having sold over $450 million worth of TON since 2025, accounting for about 10% of TON's current market value.

This means that selling coins is Telegram's main business, and simultaneously, Telegram is the biggest whale dumping TON!

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Telegram's revenue in the first half of 2025 and what was the year-over-year growth rate?

ATelegram's revenue in the first half of 2025 was $870 million, representing a 65% year-over-year growth compared to the same period in 2024.

QWhy did Telegram report a net loss in the first half of 2025 despite significant revenue growth?

ATelegram reported a net loss of over $220 million in the first half of 2025 due to a significant decline in the value of the Toncoin (TON) it held, which led to an accounting write-down of these assets.

QWhat is the relationship between Telegram and the TON blockchain project?

ATelegram initially launched the TON blockchain project in 2017 but was forced to abandon it in 2020 after a settlement with the SEC. The project was later revived by the community, and Telegram has since re-engaged with it in a 'non-official but deeply integrated' manner, with TON-related services now contributing significantly to its revenue.

QHow much of Telegram's revenue came from TON-related exclusive agreements in the first half of 2025?

AApproximately one-third of Telegram's revenue, about $300 million, came from TON-related exclusive agreements in the first half of 2025.

QWhat major financing did Telegram secure in May 2025 and which institutions were involved?

AIn May 2025, Telegram completed a $1.7 billion convertible bond financing round with backing from top-tier institutions including BlackRock and Mubadala.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the core driver and largest validator of The Open Network (TON). Key initiatives include a sixfold reduction in transaction fees, performance upgrades, and improved developer tools within the next few weeks. This marks a strategic shift from Telegram merely providing user access to deeply integrating TON into its platform's core infrastructure. The goal is to transform Telegram's massive social traffic into sustainable on-chain activity. While viral mini-apps like Notcoin have demonstrated Telegram's ability to drive user adoption, TON aims to support frequent, low-value transactions inherent to social platforms—such as tipping, in-app payments, and game rewards. Ultra-low fees and sub-second finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to making blockchain interactions seamless and nearly invisible within the Telegram user experience. However, Telegram's increased central role raises questions about network decentralization. Durov argues that Telegram's participation will attract more large validators, thereby enhancing decentralization. TON also offers high annual staking rewards (18.8%), aiming to retain capital within its ecosystem. The fundamental challenge for TON is no longer leveraging Telegram's user base, but becoming an indispensable, seamless infrastructure layer for Telegram's everyday applications—moving from an adjacent chain to an embedded utility.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Telegram's founder, Pavel Durov, has announced a major shift in the development of The Open Network (TON). Telegram will now become the core driver of TON, replacing the TON Foundation and becoming its largest validator. The focus will be on technical upgrades over the next few weeks, including slashing network fees by six times to near-zero and improving finality time to 0.6 seconds. This move signifies a deeper integration between Telegram and TON, moving beyond just providing a user base. The goal is to transform Telegram's vast social traffic and built-in features—like Mini Apps, payments, and bots—into sustainable, on-chain usage scenarios. The reduced fees and faster speeds are crucial for enabling the small, frequent transactions typical of social interactions. While this promises stronger execution and product alignment, it raises questions about centralization. Durov argues Telegram's involvement will attract more validators, enhancing decentralization, but the outcome remains to be seen. Additionally, TON's high annual staking reward of 18.8% aims to retain capital within the ecosystem. The key challenge for TON is no longer just leveraging Telegram's entry point, but becoming an invisible, seamless infrastructure layer within Telegram's daily use. Its success hinges on converting viral attention into lasting, embedded utility.

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report has intensified the ongoing bull-bear battle over the AI infrastructure stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and the firm's remaining performance obligation (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss more than doubled to $740M. The critical point of contention is profitability: while adjusted EBITDA margin was a robust 56%, the adjusted operating margin collapsed to just 1% due to soaring infrastructure and sales costs. A weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance further triggered an 11.4% single-day stock drop. The bull thesis hinges on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA (as a customer, investor, and key supplier), and a diversified client base now including Anthropic and Meta. The bear case focuses on the "scale at all costs" model, where expanding revenue leads to wider losses, ballooning debt ($25B), and massive capital expenditures ($6.8B in Q1). Insider selling by executives contrasts with a notable new investor: Chinese investor Duan Yongping initiated a small position (0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows. The coming Q2 report is seen as a key test for management's promise of a profit margin recovery.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros