Sydney Sweeney snubbed from 2026 Golden Globe nominations for ‘Christy’ after controversial year

nypostPublished on 2025-12-08Last updated on 2025-12-08

Abstract

Sydney Sweeney has been excluded from the 2026 Golden Globe nominations for her role in the project 'Christy' following a year marked by controversy. The snub comes after a period of public and industry scrutiny surrounding the actress. No further details about the specific reasons for the omission or the nature of the controversies were provided in the available content.

Related Questions

QWas Sydney Sweeney nominated for a Golden Globe in 2026 for her role in 'Christy'?

ANo, Sydney Sweeney was snubbed and did not receive a nomination for a Golden Globe in 2026 for her role in 'Christy'.

QFor which project did Sydney Sweeney fail to get a Golden Globe nomination in 2026?

AShe failed to get a nomination for her work in the project titled 'Christy'.

QWhat is the reason hinted at for Sydney Sweeney's Golden Globe snub?

AThe headline suggests it followed a controversial year for the actress, implying that the controversy may have been a factor.

QWhich major award ceremony is the article discussing in relation to Sydney Sweeney?

AThe article is discussing the Golden Globe nominations.

QWhat is the name of the actress who was reportedly snubbed from the 2026 Golden Globes?

AThe actress is Sydney Sweeney.

Related Reads

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推Hace 19 min(s)

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推Hace 19 min(s)

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

"Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC, has sparked intense debate in the crypto community following its Q3 2025 earnings report. Despite reporting strong growth—revenue up 66% YoY to $740 million and net income of $214 million, driven by a 108% increase in USDC circulation—its stock price fell significantly post-earnings and remains near its IPO price of $64. The core disagreement revolves around Circle’s business model and sustainability. Critics, including Jiang Zhuorer, argue that Circle operates like a bank, earning primarily through interest on reserve assets (mainly U.S. Treasuries), but is highly vulnerable to interest rate cuts. They highlight that ~60% of revenue is paid to distributors like Coinbase, leaving thin margins that could turn negative in a low-rate environment. They also warn of competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan and potential policy changes. Proponents, such as BTCdayu and qinbafrank, counter that Circle is building a long-term, network-driven infrastructure play. They compare it to Amazon or JD.com, arguing that current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve scale, compliance advantage, and eventual market dominance in a winner-take-all industry. They believe USDC’s合规 (compliance) edge and institutional trust will drive adoption to multi-trillion dollars, outweighing interest rate risks. Short-term concerns include significant post-IPO lockup expirations adding selling pressure, and structural barriers like U.S. tax treatment of USDC as a property (not cash), hindering retail payment adoption. The debate encapsulates a clash between cyclical concerns (rates, costs, competition) and structural optimism (scale, compliance, network effects)."

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片