SwissBorg Launches Withdrawal Protection to Counter Physical Crypto Extortion

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-10Actualizado a 2026-02-10

Resumen

SwissBorg, a leading European crypto investment app, has introduced a new security feature called Withdrawal Protection to combat physical extortion attacks. This feature imposes a non-bypassable time delay of 1 to 90 days on all external cryptocurrency withdrawals, preventing immediate asset transfers even if a user is coerced into initiating a transaction. The delay is designed to remove the incentive for real-world "wrench attacks" by eliminating the possibility of instant access to funds. According to SwissBorg CEO Cyrus Fazel, the feature provides users with additional real-world security alongside existing digital safeguards. Once enabled, the delay applies to all external withdrawals and cannot be bypassed—even by SwissBorg support. Trading, portfolio management, and internal transfers remain unaffected. The update is part of SwissBorg’s broader security strategy, which includes MPC keyless technology and Proof of Liabilities. Withdrawal Protection is available in the latest version of the SwissBorg app.

The prominent leading app in Europe for investing and earning cryptocurrency, SwissBorg, just made an announcement on the availability of Withdrawal Protection. This new security feature protects users against the increasing number of physical “wrench” assaults by imposing a time-lock that cannot be bypassed on all cryptocurrency withdrawals. This prevents the immediate transfer of assets out of a user’s account.

In light of the growing number of extortion attempts in the real world that include gaining unauthorized access to cryptocurrency wallets, there is a pressing need for additional protective measures on the human level. Withdrawal Protection is a strategy that was developed to confront and protect against this new and rising issue. A required, non-bypassable time-lock is applied to all cryptocurrency withdrawals when the feature is engaged. This prevents the immediate transfer of assets out of a user’s account during the withdrawal process. Users are able to choose a delay period that may last anywhere from one to ninety days, during which time they are unable to withdraw funds.

Physical assaults that are based on fear and a sense of urgency are discouraged by Withdrawal Protection because it eliminates the potential of rapid rewards. Even in the event that a user is compelled to unlock their device and start a withdrawal, the application will still impose the waiting time, which will theoretically prevent the user from having rapid access to their assets.

“Security must go beyond simply protecting accounts from hackers,” said Cyrus Fazel, Co-Founder and CEO of SwissBorg. “Crypto is reaching a point of widespread adoption, so it’s equally important to protect people in real-world situations. Withdrawal Protection is designed to give users time, control, and peace of mind in circumstances when digital safeguards alone may not be sufficient.”

The function is intended to be a “set and forget” safety protection once it is activated. After being activated in the security settings of the application, the delay that was determined will apply to all cryptocurrency withdrawals. There is no way to circumvent the wait, not even by SwissBorg support, which guarantees that the feature will continue to serve as an advantageous deterrent. At any moment, users have the ability to remove the Withdrawal Protection feature; nevertheless, the same wait period will apply until withdrawals are returned to immediately accessible status.

Within the SwissBorg app, trading and asset management are not impacted by the Withdrawal Protection feature. As usual, users are able to continue exchanging assets, managing portfolios, and making use of internal services. However, cryptocurrency withdrawals made outside of the SwissBorg ecosystem will continue to be time constrained. Also unaffected are internal transfers such as Smart Send, which necessitates the recipient’s Know Your Customer (KYC) documents.

SwissBorg has spent years developing a solid digital security architecture, which includes MPC keyless technology and visible Proof of Liabilities. As a result, the app is now considered to be one of the most secure places for the management of crypto assets. The implementation of Withdrawal Protection is a supplementary measure to SwissBorg’s more comprehensive “defense in depth” security approach. This strategy incorporates MPC keyless technology, Proof of Liabilities, and now a specific precaution against physical coercion.

It is possible to enable Withdrawal Protection by going to the Security section of a user’s profile, which is accessible in the most recent version of the SwissBorg app.

SwissBorg is the most prominent cryptocurrency wealth management platform that is driven by the community. It was developed in Switzerland and is licensed in the European Union. SwissBorg is not only dedicated to trust and transparency, but it is also on a mission to democratize the future of finance in order to make it possible for everyone to access financial independence. At the heart of it all is the revolutionary Meta-Exchange, which establishes a seamless connection to a number of different centralized and decentralised exchanges in order to provide consumers with the greatest possible opportunities for liquidity and pricing. In addition to trading, SwissBorg provides customers with tailored yield strategies via its DeFi platform. Additionally, the Alpha Pre-Sales platform gives users the ability to access early Web3 prospects. The Swissborg token, known as BORG, is at the center of the company’s ecosystem and offers its holders a wide range of financial and other advantages.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of SwissBorg's new Withdrawal Protection feature?

AThe main purpose of SwissBorg's Withdrawal Protection is to protect users against physical extortion and 'wrench' assaults by imposing a non-bypassable time-lock on all withdrawals, preventing the immediate transfer of assets.

QHow long can a user set the withdrawal delay period for in the Withdrawal Protection feature?

AUsers can choose a withdrawal delay period that lasts anywhere from one to ninety days.

QAccording to CEO Cyrus Fazel, why is it important to protect users in real-world situations?

ACyrus Fazel stated that as crypto reaches widespread adoption, it is equally important to protect people in real-world situations, giving users time, control, and peace of mind when digital safeguards alone may not be sufficient.

QCan the withdrawal delay be bypassed by SwissBorg support or the user?

ANo, the withdrawal delay is non-bypassable, even by SwissBorg support, guaranteeing it serves as an effective deterrent.

QWhat activities within the SwissBorg app are NOT affected by the Withdrawal Protection feature?

ATrading, asset management, portfolio management, internal services, and internal transfers like Smart Send are not affected by the Withdrawal Protection feature.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片