StarkWare tests quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on mainnet

cointelegraphPublicado a 2026-08-27Actualizado a 2026-08-27

Resumen

StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy has conducted the first test of an experimental quantum-resistant transaction on the Bitcoin mainnet. The transaction was confirmed in block 964,199, spending an output protected by Levy's Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme, which was mined by MARA Pool. QSB combines hash-based one-time signatures with computational searches to bind authorization to a specific transaction, aiming to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks Bitcoin's current elliptic-curve cryptography. This test demonstrates that Bitcoin's existing rules can support this form of quantum-resistant spending without a protocol change. However, the method remains costly and impractical for regular use. Generating the test transaction required hours of GPU computation, costing an estimated $150 to $200. Levy and StarkWare position QSB as a last-resort safety net, not a replacement for future protocol-level upgrades. Currently, QSB transactions are nonstandard under Bitcoin Core's policies, requiring direct submission to mining services like MARA's Slipstream for confirmation. The development comes amid concerns that future quantum computers could theoretically derive Bitcoin private keys minutes after a public key is exposed. While QSB offers a transaction-level solution, StarkWare's CEO emphasized the need for a broader soft fork for network-wide protection. Bitcoin developers are separately evaluating proposals, such as BIP-360, to introduce quantum-resistant features at...

StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy has tested an experimental quantum-resistant transaction on the Bitcoin mainnet, in what the company described as the first transaction of its kind.

According to StarkWare, the transaction was confirmed Wednesday in Bitcoin block 964,199. Onchain data shows that it spent a 10,000-satoshi output protected by Levy’s Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme, with MARA Pool mining the block after receiving the transaction through its Slipstream service.

Levy’s paper and code repository said QSB combines hash-based one-time signatures with computational searches that bind an authorization to a specific transaction. The construction is intended to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks the elliptic-curve cryptography Bitcoin uses.

The test moves Levy’s April proposal from theory to an onchain demonstration, showing that Bitcoin’s existing consensus rules can accommodate one form of quantum-resistant spending without a protocol change.

Quantum-resistant Bitcoin method remains costly

In March, Google researchers estimated that a sufficiently capable quantum computer could theoretically derive a Bitcoin private key nine to 12 minutes after its public key becomes visible. Google said that could allow an attacker to replace a pending transaction during Bitcoin’s confirmation window.

Levy then introduced QSB in April, estimating at the time that generating a transaction would require between $75 and $150 in GPU computation. He described it as a last-resort measure rather than a replacement for protocol-level protections.

StarkWare spokesperson Nathan Jeffay told Cointelegraph that the completed transaction cost “low hundreds of dollars,” estimating the expense at around $150 to $200. StarkWare’s release said the process took hours of computation.

Related: Banks, regulators join quantum-resistant crypto transfer pilot

Levy’s repository also classifies QSB transactions as nonstandard under Bitcoin Core’s default relay policies. StarkWare said ordinary nodes therefore would not propagate the transaction before confirmation, requiring it to be submitted directly through MARA’s Slipstream service.

QSB applies to individual Bitcoin transactions rather than upgrading cryptography across the network. “A soft fork should happen, and I believe it will,” StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said, adding that QSB provides a safety net while protocol-level protections are developed.

Bitcoin developers are separately considering proposals including BIP-360, a proposed soft fork that would introduce a Pay-to-Merkle-Root output type while removing Taproot’s quantum-vulnerable key-path spend.

Magazine: Supply absorption ‘key question’ as Bitcoin fails to reclaim $80K: Analysis

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main achievement described in the article regarding quantum computing and Bitcoin?

AThe main achievement is that StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy successfully tested an experimental quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on the mainnet, which is described as the first transaction of its kind.

QWhat problem does the Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme aim to solve?

AThe QSB scheme aims to prevent transaction forgery even if a quantum computer breaks the elliptic-curve cryptography that Bitcoin currently uses for securing transactions.

QAccording to the article, what is a significant drawback of the current QSB method?

AA significant drawback is its high cost. Generating a QSB transaction is estimated to cost between $150 and $200 and requires hours of GPU computation, making it a costly last-resort measure.

QWhy did the test transaction have to be submitted directly through MARA's Slipstream service?

ABecause QSB transactions are classified as nonstandard under Bitcoin Core's default relay policies, ordinary nodes would not propagate the transaction before confirmation, necessitating direct submission through a service like Slipstream.

QWhat is the relationship between QSB and potential future protocol-level changes for Bitcoin, as mentioned by StarkWare's CEO?

AQSB is seen as a safety net or interim solution. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson stated that a soft fork should and will happen for broader protocol-level quantum protections, and QSB provides security while those long-term solutions are developed.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Can Entropy Become the Second Trade? The Pre-IPO Competition War Has Begun

The article examines whether Entropy can become a second major player like Trade in the emerging pre-IPO prediction market space. Entropy’s recent launch of its Anthropic market gained significant attention and trading volume, but also drew comparisons to the earlier, less successful platform Ventuals. The author argues that dismissing Entropy as "just another Ventuals" overlooks the importance of nuanced design differences, similar to how Hyperliquid succeeded by innovating with its HLP and Hypercore infrastructure where previous DEXs failed. Ventuals struggled due to extremely long time horizons for pre-IPO events (e.g., launching an Anthropic market over a year before the IPO), which led to wild price dislocations and unsustainable funding rates, causing a loss of market share to Trade. In contrast, Entropy launched its Anthropic market much closer to the expected IPO date. The piece draws a parallel to Hyperliquid’s successful "pre-market wars," where gaining early liquidity was key to capturing future trading volume. Trade achieved dominance in HIP-3 markets for traditional assets by partnering with market makers and ensuring its markets reflected true economic value. Entropy’s core thesis is that providing more direct, sustainable liquidity (akin to an HLP model) and forging strong distribution partnerships will lead to more stable and accurate markets. Its success hinges on building trust in its model, possibly by pioneering a new, large-scale liquidity mechanism for HIP-3, potentially setting up a competitive landscape with Trade.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Can Entropy Become the Second Trade? The Pre-IPO Competition War Has Begun

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Wall Street Morning Post: Nvidia Revives AI Faith, Inflation Dashes Rate Cut Dreams, Food Crisis Darkens

Wall Street Morning Report: NVIDIA Revives AI Faith, Inflation Dashes Rate Cut Hopes, Food Crisis Concerns Intensify Markets lacked direction with the three major U.S. indices closing slightly lower, pressured by hotter-than-expected July PCE inflation data. The core PCE remained well above target, pushing market expectations for a September Fed rate hike higher and boosting Treasury yields. The dollar strengthened, while gold initially fell before stabilizing. Oil prices remained volatile amid ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. A significant and underappreciated inflation risk emerged from the food sector. Attacks on Black Sea ports, disrupted fertilizer supply chains, and extreme weather are severely impacting global grain supplies. HSBC warns the 2026/27 season could see the largest global grain deficit since 2006/07, with food prices accelerating. The main event was NVIDIA's stellar earnings after the bell, which reignited AI sector optimism. The company reported Q2 revenue that more than doubled year-over-year and, crucially, provided strong forward guidance, with the CFO stating real demand is nearly double current supply-constrained projections. CEO Jensen Huang declared AI has reached an "inflection point." This performance also countered the recent bearish narrative that AI would cannibalize traditional software. Companies like Salesforce and Okta posted strong results and saw shares surge, demonstrating that software firms effectively integrating AI into workflows are thriving. AI security firms like CrowdStrike also gained on heightened demand. In other movers, Meta rose after a major lawsuit settlement, while Apple gained ahead of its key product event. HP fell on weak PC shipment data. Key events to watch include the Jackson Hole symposium and earnings from companies like Marvell and Workday. The planned open-sourcing of China's GLM-5.3 model could further impact AI-related sectors.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Wall Street Morning Post: Nvidia Revives AI Faith, Inflation Dashes Rate Cut Dreams, Food Crisis Darkens

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片