Starknet TVL reclaims $300m for first time since 2024 as on-chain activity recovers

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-14Actualizado a 2026-01-14

Resumen

Starknet's total value locked (TVL) has rebounded to over $300 million for the first time since early 2024, signaling a recovery in on-chain activity and capital deployment after a prolonged decline. The TVL reached $302.12 million, nearing its all-time high of $307 million. This resurgence is supported by a record stablecoin market cap of approximately $248 million and an average of 65,000 daily active users, ranking Starknet fifth among Layer-2 networks. Despite trailing behind competitors like Base and Arbitrum, the network shows signs of stabilization and renewed user confidence, moving past outdated narratives and into a phase of measurable recovery.

Starknet’s total value locked [TVL] has climbed back above $300 million for the first time since 2024, according to data from DeFiLlama. The climb marks a notable recovery in capital deployed across the Ethereum Layer-2 network after more than a year of decline.

The rebound follows a prolonged drawdown that saw Starknet’s TVL decline sharply throughout 2024 amid weak Layer-2 sentiment and a decrease in on-chain activity.

While the network remains well below its historical peak, the return to the $300 million level represents its strongest capital position in over a year.

Starknet TVL returns to levels last seen in early 2024

DeFiLlama data shows Starknet’s TVL has risen steadily in recent weeks, reversing losses accumulated during the second half of 2024. As of this writing, the TVL was $302.12 million.

The recovery places the network back at capital levels last observed in early 2024, when it reached its all-time high of $307 million, before liquidity thinned out.

The move suggests renewed confidence among users deploying assets on Starknet, even as competition among Layer-2 networks remains intense.

Alongside rising TVL, Starknet has also seen a significant increase in stablecoin liquidity. DeFiLlama data shows the network’s stablecoin market capitalization has climbed to approximately $248 million, its highest point ever.

Growing stablecoin balances are often viewed as a key indicator of deeper DeFi participation.

Starknet user activity shows signs of stabilization

The TVL recovery is being supported by improving usage metrics. Data from Token Terminal indicates Starknet currently averages around 65,000 daily active users.

Additionally, it ranks fifth among Layer-2 blockchains in terms of daily activity.

While that figure remains below the network’s highs from 2023, it marks a sustained improvement from mid-2024

Outdated narratives quashed as data shifts

The recovery comes with a recent sarcastic social media post from Solana that resurfaced a widely shared 2024 post. The 2024 post suggested that Starknet had eight daily active users, which was also due to lapsed data.

Current on-chain data show that Starknet’s activity today is orders of magnitude higher than those claims imply, even if it continues to trail leading Layer-2 networks such as Base and Arbitrum.

Recovery remains relative amid Layer-2 competition

Despite reclaiming the $300 million TVL level, Starknet remains well below its historical highs and continues to face strong competition from newer Layer-2 platforms.

Still, the combination of rising TVL, expanding stablecoin liquidity, and stabilizing user activity indicates Starknet has moved out of its 2024 trough and into a phase of measurable recovery.

Whether that recovery can be sustained will depend less on social narratives and more on continued capital deployment and real on-chain usage.

Final Thoughts

Starknet’s return above $300 million in TVL marks its strongest on-chain recovery since 2024, supported by rising stablecoin liquidity and improving user activity.
While activity remains below historical highs, current data challenges outdated narratives and suggests capital is gradually returning to the network.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current Total Value Locked (TVL) on Starknet according to DeFiLlama?

AThe current TVL on Starknet is $302.12 million.

QWhat key metric, besides TVL, has reached its highest point ever on Starknet, indicating deeper DeFi participation?

AThe network's stablecoin market capitalization has climbed to approximately $248 million, its highest point ever.

QHow many daily active users does Starknet currently average, and what is its rank among Layer-2 blockchains in daily activity?

AStarknet currently averages around 65,000 daily active users and ranks fifth among Layer-2 blockchains in terms of daily activity.

QWhat outdated social media claim about Starknet's user activity from 2024 was recently resurfaced and contradicted by current data?

AA 2024 social media post sarcastically suggested that Starknet had only eight daily active users, a claim that is orders of magnitude lower than the current on-chain data shows.

QWhat was Starknet's all-time high TVL, and when was it reached before the recent decline?

AStarknet reached its all-time high TVL of $307 million in early 2024 before liquidity thinned out.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Hace 37 min(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Hace 37 min(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The AI Bubble is Bursting

The article argues that while a bubble in the AI sector is real and is currently showing signs of deflation, this is a typical, even necessary, phase for a transformative technology. It draws parallels to the dot-com bubble, where speculative excess was followed by the consolidation of internet infrastructure, enabling the digital age. Similarly, today's massive investments in AI infrastructure (data centers, power, cooling) far outpace current application-layer revenue, creating a valuation imbalance. However, the author contends this apparent bubble is not a sign of failure but of a transition. Key drivers include the plummeting cost of AI inference (over 99.7% in two years), which, per Jevons Paradox, has unleashed massive new demand as AI moves from simple tasks to complex agentic workflows across all industries. The market is now cleansing itself of shallow, speculative ventures, shifting value from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative AI applications. The conclusion is that the underlying productive force of AI is undeniable. The current financial correction will eliminate weak players, leaving behind robust infrastructure and efficient models. This will ultimately fuel an "AI+" era where intelligence becomes as ubiquitous and essential as the internet, embedding itself into every sector of the economy.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros