Stablecoins hit $300B market cap: Why Tether’s $10B profit is just the beginning

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-26Actualizado a 2026-01-26

Resumen

Stablecoins have become the dominant revenue engine in crypto, with the market cap reaching $300 billion. Tether exemplifies this by generating over $10 billion in profit in 2025. Ethereum serves as the primary settlement layer, with stablecoin supply on it growing to over $160 billion and generating roughly $5 billion in revenue that year. Concurrently, Ondo Finance has emerged as a leading real-world asset (RWA) platform, with its Total Value Locked (TVL) surging to $2.5 billion, driven by tokenized U.S. Treasuries and equities. The growth in RWA TVL is closely linked to the expansion of the stablecoin market, as stablecoins provide the essential liquidity and settlement rails. This trend highlights a shift towards structural, yield-based growth rather than speculative narratives.

While L1s ecosystems continue to chase hype through narrative cycles and speculative throughput claims, crypto’s most reliable profits have accrued elsewhere.

Stablecoins have quietly evolved into the sector’s dominant revenue engine, driven by their scale, ubiquity, and control over on-chain settlement.

As a result, issuers have been able to convert this structural advantage into sustained cash flows, exemplified by Tether [USDT] generating over $10 billion in profit in 2025.

Stablecoin issuers have evolved into large-scale revenue generators, with Ethereum serving as the dominant settlement layer, anchoring that growth.

In 2025 alone, issuers generated roughly $5 billion in revenue tied to Ethereum-based supply. Quarterly revenue expanded from near $1.2 billion early in the year to about $1.4 billion by Q4.

At the same time, stablecoin supply on Ethereum [ETH] grew by nearly $50 billion, surpassing $160 billion.

As reserves expanded, yield-based income scaled predictably. This dynamic reinforces Ethereum’s financial gravity, deepens liquidity, and strengthens its role as core on-chain monetary infrastructure.

ONDO emerges as a core liquidity hub for tokenized RWAs

ONDO Finance is rapidly consolidating its position as a leading real-world asset platform, with Ondo Finance [ONDO] pushing total value locked (TVL) to roughly $2.5 billion by January 2026.

Earlier in 2025, TVL hovered just above $1 billion. Since then, capital has accelerated sharply, driven by tokenized yield products.

Tokenized U.S. Treasuries account for nearly $2 billion, led by OUSG and Ondo US Dollar Yield [USDY]. Meanwhile, tokenized stocks and ETFs exceed $500 million across more than 200 assets.

As ONDO expands across multiple chains, its scale signals growing institutional confidence in on-chain RWAs.

Is RWA TVL growth following stablecoin liquidity cycles?

RWA TVL growth increasingly tracks stablecoin supply expansion, revealing a clear liquidity-driven relationship.

As the stablecoin market cap climbed toward $280–300 billion by late 2025, RWA TVL simultaneously expanded to roughly $16–19 billion.

This side-by-side growth reflects function, not coincidence. Stablecoins act as settlement rails and yield-bearing inputs for tokenized treasuries and equities.

Consequently, platforms like Ondo doubled TVL beyond $2.5 billion as stablecoin-backed demand intensified.

Therefore, the trend signals structural conviction, though short-term stalls in stablecoin issuance can temporarily cap RWA momentum.


Final Thoughts

  • Stablecoins have become crypto’s most reliable profit engine, translating settlement scale into recurring cash flows while Ethereum reinforces its role as the dominant on-chain monetary layer.
  • Concurrently, RWA growth remains liquidity-driven, with TVL expansion closely following stablecoin supply, positioning platforms like ONDO as beneficiaries of stablecoin-backed demand rather than speculative cycles.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Tether's profit in 2025 according to the article?

ATether generated over $10 billion in profit in 2025.

QWhat is the total value locked (TVL) in Ondo Finance by January 2026?

AThe total value locked (TVL) in Ondo Finance reached roughly $2.5 billion by January 2026.

QHow much revenue did stablecoin issuers generate from Ethereum-based supply in 2025?

AStablecoin issuers generated roughly $5 billion in revenue tied to Ethereum-based supply in 2025.

QWhat is the relationship between RWA TVL growth and stablecoin supply, as described in the article?

ARWA TVL growth increasingly tracks stablecoin supply expansion, revealing a clear liquidity-driven relationship where stablecoins act as settlement rails and yield-bearing inputs.

QWhat role does Ethereum play in the stablecoin ecosystem, according to the final thoughts?

AEthereum reinforces its role as the dominant on-chain monetary layer for stablecoins.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片