Stablecoin Yields May Boost US Bank Deposits: Patrick Witt

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-12Actualizado a 2026-03-12

Resumen

Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, argues that the debate over stablecoin yields overlooks a broader macroeconomic benefit. Contrary to concerns from banking groups that yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits, Witt suggests that under the GENIUS Act framework, compliant stablecoins may actually bring new capital into the U.S. banking system. He explains that global demand for USD is significant, and when foreigners purchase U.S.-issued stablecoins, it represents net new capital entering American banks. This discussion occurs amid ongoing tension between policymakers, banks, and crypto firms regarding whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest-like returns. Traditional banks, like the American Bankers Association, warn that such yields could threaten bank deposits and advocate for a level regulatory playing field. Crypto industry representatives counter that the GENIUS Act already imposes strict reserve requirements, mandating full backing by cash or cash-equivalents. Witt emphasizes that it is not the payment of yield itself that necessitates bank-like regulation, but rather the lending or rehypothecation of underlying funds—which the GENIUS Act explicitly prohibits.

The recent debate concerning stablecoin yields may be neglecting a wider macroeconomic dynamic, as per Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

On March 11, Witt posted on X, mentioning that the stablecoins’ complaint with the GENIUS Act framework could really influence new funds into the U.S. banking system instead of draining deposits away from it, as some banking groups have alerted.

Witt mentioned that lost in the rewards/yield debate is how GENIUS-compliant stablecoins will really lead to deposit inflows. The global demand for USD is huge. Foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from a US-based issuer, and that is net new capital setting its foot into the American banking system.

The comment from Witt comes amid the continuing clash of policymakers, banks and crypto firms over whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to permit rewards or interest-like incentives to holders.

Concerns of the Market Players

Traditional banking groups have alerted that yield-bearing stablecoins could influence deposits from the US banking system. The latest survey authorised by the American Bankers Association found that consumers widely backed limitations on stablecoin rewards, voicing concerns regarding financial risk.

The CEO and ABA President Rob Nichols mentioned earlier this week that our industry welcomes competition and revolution. Although he alerted that the regulator should avoid making an uneven playing field where crypto companies offer bank-like products without following equivalent regulatory standards.

Crypto industry players have claimed that stablecoin issuers so far witness strict reserve needs under the GENIUS Act, which requires tokens to be completely supported by cash or cash-equivalent assets.

Witt also had the same concerns at the start of this month. It is not the paying of yield on a balance per se that requires bank-like regulations, but instead the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance.

The GENIUS Act deliberately restricts stablecoin issuers from doing the latter.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

CBI Arrests Darwin Labs Co-Founder in Multi-Crore GainBitcoin Scam

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Patrick Witt, how could GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins potentially affect the US banking system?

APatrick Witt argues that GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins could lead to deposit inflows into the US banking system, as foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from US-based issuers, bringing net new capital into American banks.

QWhat concern have traditional banking groups raised about yield-bearing stablecoins?

ATraditional banking groups have warned that yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits from the US banking system.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association survey find regarding consumer attitudes toward stablecoin rewards?

AThe American Bankers Association survey found that consumers widely supported limitations on stablecoin rewards, expressing concerns about financial risk.

QWhat regulatory requirement does the GENIUS Act impose on stablecoin issuers regarding their reserves?

AThe GENIUS Act requires stablecoin tokens to be fully backed by cash or cash-equivalent assets.

QAccording to Witt, what specific activity (not the payment of yield itself) would require bank-like regulations for stablecoin issuers?

AWitt stated that it is not the payment of yield itself, but the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance that would require bank-like regulations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Qué es $BANK

Banco AI: Un Paso Revolucionario en el Futuro de la Banca Introducción En una era marcada por avances rápidos en tecnología, Banco AI se sitúa en la intersección de la inteligencia artificial (IA) y los servicios bancarios. Este proyecto innovador busca redefinir el panorama financiero, mejorando la eficiencia operativa, las medidas de seguridad y las experiencias del cliente a través del poder de la IA. Al embarcarnos en esta exploración de Banco AI, profundizaremos en lo que implica el proyecto, sus dinámicas operativas, su contexto histórico y hitos significativos. ¿Qué es Banco AI? En su esencia, Banco AI representa una iniciativa transformadora destinada a integrar la inteligencia artificial en varias operaciones bancarias. Este proyecto aprovecha las capacidades de la IA para automatizar procesos, mejorar los protocolos de gestión de riesgos y mejorar la interacción con los clientes a través de servicios personalizados. Los objetivos principales de Banco AI incluyen: Automatización de Funciones Bancarias: Al aprovechar las tecnologías de IA, Banco AI tiene como objetivo automatizar tareas rutinarias, reduciendo la carga sobre los recursos humanos y mejorando la eficiencia. Mejora en la Gestión de Riesgos: El proyecto utiliza algoritmos de IA para predecir e identificar riesgos, fortaleciendo así las medidas de seguridad contra fraudes y otras amenazas. Personalización de Servicios Bancarios: Banco AI se centra en ofrecer productos y servicios financieros a medida al analizar datos y comportamientos de los clientes. Mejoramiento de la Experiencia del Cliente: La implementación de soluciones impulsadas por IA, como chatbots y asistentes virtuales, tiene como objetivo proporcionar a los usuarios interacciones más humanas, revolucionando la forma en que los clientes se relacionan con los bancos. Con estos objetivos, Banco AI se posiciona como un jugador crucial para hacer que la banca sea más eficiente, segura y centrada en el usuario. ¿Quién es el Creador de Banco AI? Los detalles sobre el creador de Banco AI siguen siendo desconocidos. Como tal, no se ha identificado a ninguna persona u organización específica en la información disponible. El anonimato que rodea el inicio del proyecto plantea preguntas, pero no resta valor a su ambiciosa visión y objetivos. ¿Quiénes Son los Inversores de Banco AI? Al igual que con el creador del proyecto, no se ha divulgado información específica sobre los inversores u organizaciones que apoyan a Banco AI. Sin esta información, es un desafío delinear el respaldo financiero y el apoyo institucional que podrían estar impulsando el proyecto hacia adelante. No obstante, la importancia de contar con una sólida base de inversión es fundamental para sostener el desarrollo en un campo tan innovador. ¿Cómo Funciona Banco AI? Banco AI opera en múltiples frentes innovadores, centrándose en factores únicos que lo diferencian de los marcos bancarios tradicionales. A continuación, se presentan las características operativas clave: Automatización: Al aplicar algoritmos de aprendizaje automático, Banco AI automatiza varios procesos manuales dentro de los bancos. Esto resulta en la reducción de costos operativos y permite que los trabajadores humanos redirijan sus esfuerzos hacia actividades más estratégicas. Gestión Avanzada de Riesgos: La integración de la IA en las prácticas de gestión de riesgos equipa a los bancos con herramientas para predecir con precisión amenazas potenciales como el fraude, garantizando que la información y los activos de los clientes permanezcan seguros. Recomendaciones Financieras Personalizadas: A través del aprendizaje continuo a partir de las interacciones con los clientes, los sistemas de IA desarrollan una comprensión matizada de las necesidades del usuario, lo que les permite ofrecer consejos adaptados sobre decisiones financieras. Interacciones Mejoradas con los Clientes: Al utilizar chatbots y asistentes virtuales impulsados por IA, Banco AI permite una experiencia más atractiva para el cliente, permitiendo a los usuarios resolver sus consultas rápidamente, reduciendo así los tiempos de espera y mejorando los niveles de satisfacción. En conjunto, estas características operativas posicionan a Banco AI como un pionero en el sector bancario, estableciendo nuevos parámetros para la entrega de servicios y la excelencia operativa. Línea de Tiempo de Banco AI Entender la trayectoria de Banco AI requiere mirar su contexto histórico. A continuación, se presenta una línea de tiempo que destaca hitos y desarrollos importantes: Inicios de 2010: La conceptualización de la integración de la IA en los servicios bancarios comenzó a ganar atención a medida que las instituciones bancarias reconocieron los posibles beneficios. 2018: Se produjo un aumento notable en la implementación de tecnologías de IA cuando los bancos comenzaron a utilizar herramientas de IA como chatbots para el servicio al cliente básico y sistemas de gestión de riesgos para mejorar la seguridad. 2023: La sofisticación de la IA continuó avanzando, con la introducción de IA generativa para tareas más complejas como el procesamiento de documentos y análisis de inversiones en tiempo real. Este año marcó un salto significativo en las capacidades que la tecnología de IA otorgó a los bancos. 2024-Estatus Actual: A partir de este año, Banco AI se encuentra en una trayectoria ascendente, con investigaciones y desarrollos en curso que pronto mejorarán las capacidades en las operaciones bancarias. La continua exploración de las aplicaciones de IA sugiere emocionantes desarrollos aún por venir. Puntos Clave Sobre Banco AI Integración de la IA en la Banca: Banco AI se centra en adoptar inteligencia artificial para optimizar los procesos bancarios y mejorar la experiencia del usuario. Enfoque en Automatización y Gestión de Riesgos: El proyecto enfatiza fuertemente estas áreas, con el objetivo de desplazar la carga de tareas rutinarias mientras mejora los marcos de seguridad a través de análisis predictivos. Soluciones Bancarias Personalizadas: Al aprovechar los datos de los clientes, Banco AI permite servicios bancarios adaptados a las necesidades individuales de los usuarios. Compromiso con el Desarrollo: Banco AI se mantiene comprometido con esfuerzos de investigación y desarrollo continuos, asegurando su adaptabilidad y relevancia continua a medida que la tecnología sigue evolucionando. Conclusión En resumen, Banco AI ejemplifica un paso crucial hacia adelante en la industria bancaria, aprovechando la inteligencia artificial para redefinir los paradigmas operativos, mejorar la seguridad y promover la satisfacción del cliente. A pesar de las lagunas en la información sobre el creador y los inversores, los objetivos claros y los mecanismos funcionales de Banco AI proporcionan una sólida base para su evolución continua. A medida que la tecnología de IA sigue avanzando y fusionándose con el sector bancario, Banco AI está bien posicionado para impactar significativamente el futuro de los servicios financieros, mejorando la forma en que entendemos e interactuamos con la banca.

186 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.06Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Cómo comprar BANK

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Después de comprar tu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Tradear fácilmente con Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

814 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.05.09Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BANK (BANK).