Stablecoin usage up 600% – Is USDC taking the lead from USDT?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-23Actualizado a 2026-03-23

Resumen

Stablecoin usage on the Ethereum network has grown significantly, with active addresses surging 600% from March 2025 to March 2026, indicating deeper integration beyond speculative trading into payments and cross-border transactions. A notable shift in market preference shows USD Coin (USDC) leading with a $4.5 billion supply increase, while Tether (USDT) experienced a $2 billion contraction, reflecting a move toward perceived regulatory clarity. Despite a slight decline in exchange reserves and net outflows of $485 million, the capital is being parked rather than fully exiting, reducing immediate sell pressure and supporting short-term market stability. Overall, stablecoin liquidity is consolidating rather than expanding, with total supply at $316.45 billion.

ERC20 stablecoin activity is undergoing a structural expansion, as active addresses surged from roughly 85,000 in March 2025 to nearly 600,000 in March 2026.

This 600% growth reflects more than temporary spikes, as activity has trended upward steadily since 2024. As participation broadens, the pattern shifts from isolated bursts to sustained usage, which suggests deeper integration across the network.

At the same time, this rise signals a change in function.

Stablecoins are moving beyond DeFi trading pairs toward transactional infrastructure. As a result, flows increasingly reflect payments, settlements, and cross-border transfers rather than speculative positioning.

However, rising activity also implies higher dependency on stablecoin liquidity.

As usage concentrates around these assets, they become central to capital movement across markets. This dynamic suggests crypto liquidity is becoming more efficient, while also more sensitive to stablecoin-driven demand cycles.

Stablecoin flows shift as USDC gains dominance over USDT

Stablecoin flows show a clear rotation in market preference, as USD Coin [USDC] leads supply expansion year-to-date.

USDC added $4.5 billion, marking the largest increase across all tracked assets. This rise reflects strong inflows during a volatile period.

Tether [USDT] moved in the opposite direction, with its supply contracting by roughly $2 billion, signaling capital outflows. As this divergence forms, it highlights a shift toward perceived stability and regulatory clarity.

This gap suggests growing usage beyond simple liquidity storage. As volumes expand, USDC strengthens its role in DeFi and payments infrastructure.

However, this concentration also implies that liquidity is becoming more centralized. As capital rotates, market dependence on fewer stablecoins increases, shaping how liquidity flows across the broader ecosystem.

Stablecoin flows show consolidation, not capitulation

Stablecoin flows reflect a cautious but balanced shift, as liquidity moves away from exchanges without fully exiting the market. Exchange Reserves stand at $65.37 billion, down 0.72% in 24 hours.

Net Outflows reached over $485 million, signaling movement toward self-custody. This suggests capital is being parked rather than actively deployed. However, this shift also reduces immediate sell pressure on exchanges, which can support price stability.

Total stablecoin supply sits at $316.45 billion, rising just 0.17% weekly. USDT grew 0.08% to $184.1 billion, while USDC fell 0.22% to $79.1 billion, showing mixed demand.

This balance implies liquidity is rotating rather than expanding, keeping markets stable in the short term while leaving momentum dependent on renewed capital deployment.

Final Summary

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage growth in active addresses for ERC20 stablecoins from March 2025 to March 2026?

A600%

QWhich stablecoin led the supply expansion year-to-date and by how much?

AUSD Coin (USDC) led the supply expansion, adding $4.5 billion.

QWhat was the change in Tether's (USDT) supply during the same timeframe?

ATether's (USDT) supply contracted by roughly $2 billion.

QWhat is the new primary function that stablecoins are moving towards, according to the article?

AStablecoins are moving beyond DeFi trading pairs toward transactional infrastructure, such as payments, settlements, and cross-border transfers.

QWhat was the total stablecoin supply and the 24-hour change in Exchange Reserves mentioned in the article?

AThe total stablecoin supply was $316.45 billion, and Exchange Reserves were $65.37 billion, down 0.72% in 24 hours.

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight NewsHace 34 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight NewsHace 34 min(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros