Stablecoin payments below $200 can go tax-free: If Congress agrees

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-21Actualizado a 2025-12-21

Resumen

In a renewed bipartisan effort, U.S. lawmakers Max Miller and Steven Horsford have proposed a tax exemption for stablecoin transactions valued at $200 or below, aiming to provide clarity and consumer protection. This follows a previous failed attempt by Senator Cynthia Lummis in 2025 to introduce a similar exemption. Currently, the IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, subjecting it to capital gains tax. Meanwhile, banking lobbyists oppose the high yields offered by crypto exchanges on stablecoin deposits, arguing it threatens traditional banks. Industry leaders, including Gemini's co-founder, are defending the GENIUS Act against what they call anti-competitive overreach by banks. The outcome of both the tax proposal and the stablecoin yield debate remains uncertain.

The U.S. Congress is making another attempt at tax relief for low stablecoin transfers and crypto staking.

In a recent House proposal, lawmakers Max Miller (Ohio) and Steven Horsford (Nevada) sought tax exemptions for stablecoins valued at $200 or below.

Part of the draft read,

“The provision is intended to establish a per-transaction de minimis threshold of $200, consistent with the foreign currency transaction exception under section 988.”

In a statement, Rep. Miller said that the legislation was a “bipartisan effort” to ensure consumer protection.

“This bill would protect consumers making everyday purchases, ensure the rules are clear for innovators and investors, and strengthen compliance so everyone plays by the same rules.”

However, this was not the first time Congress had tried to push for U.S. crypto tax clarity.

Senator Lummis’ failed crypto tax plan

In July 2025, pro-Bitcoin Senator Cynthia Lummis floated a similar tax proposal that included a $300 exemption for small transactions.

She also advocated for tax deferral for staking and mining rewards during the amendment process of President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. The exemption was to have an annual cap of $5,000 on crypto gains to avoid abuse.

However, the provisions didn’t make it to the final version of the bill after failing to reach the voting threshold. Some Democrats also opposed the proposal, arguing that it would result in a loss of government revenue.

Currently, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37%.

For long-term investors, the tax rates are relatively favorable, ranging from 0% to 20%.

It remains to be seen whether the latest tax proposals will be included in the crypto market structure bill.

Stablecoin yield fight

Even so, the stablecoin yield paid out by crypto exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase, among others, continues to be opposed by the banking lobby.

According to them, it threatens community banks. They argued that deposit capital will shift to stablecoins in search of the 3%-4% rewards, rather than banks’ less than 1% yield on average checking accounts.

However, Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss and other industry players are also pushing back against the banksters’ anti-competitive ‘overreach.’

Reacting to a collective industry letter to Congress to defend the stablecoin law GENIUS Act, Winklevoss stated,

“We are not going to let them (banks) get away with this. That’s why we signed onto this letter with 125+ other companies to defend the GENIUS Act as it is written.”

Final Thoughts

Congress has revived the crypto tax exemptions for low stablecoin transfers.
However, the fight against stablecoin rewards issued by exchanges continues.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the proposed de minimis threshold for tax exemptions on stablecoin transfers in the recent House proposal?

AThe proposed de minimis threshold is $200 or below for stablecoin transfers.

QWhich two lawmakers are behind the recent proposal for tax exemptions on small stablecoin transactions?

AThe lawmakers are Max Miller from Ohio and Steven Horsford from Nevada.

QWhat was the outcome of Senator Cynthia Lummis's similar crypto tax proposal in July 2025?

ASenator Lummis's proposal, which included a $300 exemption for small transactions and tax deferral for staking and mining rewards, failed to reach the voting threshold and was not included in the final version of the bill.

QWhy are banking lobbies opposing the stablecoin yields offered by exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase?

ABanking lobbies argue that stablecoin yields threaten community banks because deposit capital may shift to stablecoins seeking 3%-4% rewards, compared to banks' average checking account yields of less than 1%.

QHow does the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) currently treat cryptocurrency for tax purposes?

AThe IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37% for short-term gains and 0% to 20% for long-term gains.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 8 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 8 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot