SpaceX Initiates Preparations for Largest IPO in History, Can Four Major Investment Banks Handle an $800 Billion Valuation?

比推Publicado a 2026-01-23Actualizado a 2026-01-23

Resumen

SpaceX is preparing for what could become the world's largest IPO, having selected Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley as lead underwriters. The company, valued at $800 billion in its latest internal share sale, may raise over $30 billion, surpassing Saudi Aramco's 2019 record. The IPO could take place as early as this year, though final decisions are still pending. SpaceX has established itself as a leading commercial rocket developer and operator of the Starlink satellite internet service. Its recent acquisition of wireless spectrum licenses further strengthens its market position. The potential listing is part of a broader wave of major tech IPOs, including companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, and Canva. While market volatility remains a risk, the IPO market has recently regained momentum amid rising stock prices.

Author: Bao Yilong

Original Title: Is the World's Largest IPO Coming? SpaceX Selects Goldman Sachs and Three Other Major Investment Banks as Underwriters

Elon Musk's rocket manufacturer SpaceX is preparing for what could be a record-breaking global IPO, selecting four Wall Street investment banks as lead underwriters.

According to the Financial Times, citing informed sources, SpaceX executives recently held meetings with bankers from Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley, with the company planning to go public as early as this year.

The report cited sources indicating that other banks may also secure roles in the listing, but they cautiously noted that no final decision has been made yet.

Since its founding over two decades ago, SpaceX's valuation has continued to climb. The company has solidified its position as a leading developer of commercial rockets while also operating the Starlink satellite internet service.

As noted by Wall Street News, SpaceX set the price of its latest internal stock offering at $421 per share in December last year, valuing the company at an astonishing $800 billion. This could potentially set a record for the largest IPO in history.

Four Major Banks Lead Preparation Work

According to informed sources, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley have secured leading roles in SpaceX's IPO project. Sources added that other investment banks may also obtain positions in the project, but no final decision has been made yet. All four banks declined to comment, and SpaceX did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

As noted by Wall Street News, SpaceX's IPO is expected to raise over $30 billion, likely surpassing the $29 billion record set by Saudi Aramco's IPO in 2019, making it the largest IPO in history.

In September last year, SpaceX reached a $17 billion deal with the struggling operator EchoStar to acquire wireless spectrum licenses to enhance the Starlink network, enabling Musk to expand the service in the United States.

This deal further solidifies SpaceX's dominant position in the satellite internet field.

Tech Giants Flock to Go Public

SpaceX's listing preparations come as the U.S. market may welcome several large tech company IPOs.

AI companies OpenAI and Anthropic are also preparing for potential listing plans. Analysts say that just these three deals could raise more than the total amount of U.S. IPOs for the entire last year.

Other large private companies planning to go public this year include data analytics firm Databricks, valued at $134 billion, and design platform Canva, valued at $42 billion. The fitness tracking app Strava is also expected to launch its IPO in the coming months.

Despite the optimistic outlook, market volatility could still disrupt these listing plans.

Trump's tariff policies led to last year's IPO market falling short of expectations. Trump's tariff announcement in April dragged down the stock market, delaying several major tech company IPOs, disappointing investment bankers who had expected the listing market to recover strongly after three years of downturn.

However, as companies advance long-delayed listing plans and rising stock markets provide support, the IPO market has recently regained momentum.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7605563

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich four major investment banks has SpaceX selected to lead its IPO preparation?

ASpaceX has selected Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley to lead its IPO preparation.

QWhat is the potential valuation of SpaceX for its upcoming IPO as mentioned in the article?

AThe potential valuation for SpaceX's upcoming IPO is an astounding $800 billion.

QWhat record could the SpaceX IPO break if it proceeds as planned?

AThe SpaceX IPO could break the record for the world's largest IPO, surpassing the $29 billion record set by Saudi Aramco in 2019.

QBesides its rocket manufacturing, what other major business contributes to SpaceX's high valuation?

ASpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service is a major business that contributes to its high valuation.

QAccording to the article, what are some other major tech companies that are also preparing for potential IPOs?

AOther major tech companies preparing for potential IPOs include OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, Canva, and the fitness tracking app Strava.

Lecturas Relacionadas

A major Bitcoin market player, inactive for four years, transferred Bitcoin worth about 46 million dollars! Here are the details

A large Bitcoin investor, inactive for four years, has moved 730 BTC worth approximately $46.12 million. The assets, accumulated over seven years, were transferred to a newly created wallet from an address with no prior transaction history. Analysts suggest the move could be linked to recently discovered security vulnerabilities in hardware wallets, potentially prompting long-term holders to migrate funds for safety. There is no evidence the bitcoins were sent to an exchange, leaving the intent—whether for security or potential sale—unclear. This follows another recent large transfer of over 16,400 BTC (worth >$1 billion) by a separate long-term holder. Such activity signals renewed movement of funds among major investors, though transfers between wallets do not necessarily indicate imminent selling and can be for security or portfolio management purposes.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

A major Bitcoin market player, inactive for four years, transferred Bitcoin worth about 46 million dollars! Here are the details

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Bitcoin may find bear market bottom in August: 10x Research

Research firm 10x Research suggests Bitcoin could confirm a bear-market bottom in August if it achieves a monthly close above $63,000, which would turn several of their technical indicators bullish. While their analysis was prepared with Bitcoin trading at $63,140, a slight gain from July's close could trigger this signal. The report cites steady Federal Reserve rates as a base case but notes risks from potential rate hikes and geopolitical conflict. Additional selling pressure is expected from miners and treasury companies. Grayscale's research head separately suggested Bitcoin may have bottomed earlier than the traditional four-year cycle, with macro conditions being the primary price driver. Other indicators, like over half of Bitcoin's supply being held at a loss and a record balance held by long-term investors, are also seen as signs a market bottom is approaching.

cointelegraphHace 20 min(s)

Bitcoin may find bear market bottom in August: 10x Research

cointelegraphHace 20 min(s)

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

The article "The Foreign Guest: Genspark" investigates the identity and business practices of AI startup Genspark, which presents itself as a Palo Alto-based "AI Costco" offering a subscription bundle of over 70 models and numerous AI agent tools. Despite its official Silicon Valley narrative, Genspark's founding team has deep roots in Chinese tech giant Baidu, a history systematically downplayed in its branding. The company actively cultivates an image as an elite US firm, heavily publicizing partnerships and endorsements from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft, while distancing itself from the Chinese AI community and obscuring its connections to Chinese investors and open-weight models (like those from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax) that power its services. Genspark's core strategy involves rapidly cloning and integrating successful AI product concepts (e.g., from Perplexity, Manus, Plaud) into its unified platform, supported by aggressive marketing, including Super Bowl ads and paid native content in publications like The Wall Street Journal. Critically, the article suggests a significant portion of its engineering and product development is conducted by a team in Beijing, operating outside its official US corporate structure. This duality allows Genspark to leverage Chinese talent and models for efficiency and cost reduction while constructing a public facade as a purely American success story. The piece concludes that Genspark's most effective agent is its own corporate identity, meticulously engineered to obscure its Chinese underpinnings and be perceived solely as a Silicon Valley company.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Should Bitcoin Be "Immutable"? Craig Wright Reignites Governance Route Dispute

The debate over Bitcoin's governance is reignited by Craig Wright, who argues the protocol should remain permanently fixed and immutable. He views Bitcoin's core value as its transparent, unchangeable monetary rules, contrasting it with traditional finance. This stance sparks discussion on whether Bitcoin should evolve to address security threats, user demands, and efficiency, or if its determinism is its primary strength. The article notes that Bitcoin has undergone significant upgrades like SegWit and Taproot, achieved through community consensus rather than top-down decisions. However, tension persists between the need for stability—which fosters trust—and the need for adaptation to remain competitive. A key concern is the influence of core developers versus the decentralized ideal. Ultimately, the debate centers on finding a governance model that balances immutable core principles with the ability to innovate. This challenge is fundamental to Bitcoin's future as a decentralized global system.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Should Bitcoin Be "Immutable"? Craig Wright Reignites Governance Route Dispute

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

While South Korean auto workers fear job losses from robotics, Elon Musk envisions a future where AI and robots render most work optional. This article explores the growing tension between immediate anxieties over automation and long-term visions of a post-work society. The piece begins with recent strikes at Hyundai's Korean plants, where unions, amid standard wage negotiations, also sought job guarantees against advancing robotics—specifically mentioning Boston Dynamics' Atlas. This reflects how anxiety about technological displacement is emerging even before robots are fully capable of replacing skilled labor on assembly lines. The author argues that while current robotics still struggle with the nuanced, experiential knowledge of veteran workers, the *perception* of imminent replacement is fueling social conflict prematurely. This modern "Luddite" sentiment is compared to the 19th-century English textile workers who smashed machines. Historically, Luddites weren't simply anti-technology; they were protesting the rapid devaluation of their skills and the unequal distribution of productivity gains. Similarly, today's workers ask who will bear the cost of transition and share in the new wealth created by machines. In contrast, figures like Elon Musk propose an optimistic endpoint: with AI and robotics driving extreme abundance, the link between work and survival could break. He suggests concepts like "Universal High Income" could allow society to share the technological bounty, transforming work from a necessity into a choice. The core challenge, however, lies in the transition. The author notes that technology's benefits diffuse slowly, while its disruptive costs—job losses, skill obsolescence—can be concentrated and immediate. The risk is a painful interim period where productivity gains are captured by a few before new social contracts, safety nets, and retraining systems are established. The conclusion calls for proactive governance. Just as past industrial revolutions gave rise to labor standards and social safety nets, the robotics era needs its own frameworks. These should address job transition support, distribution of productivity gains, safety liability, and ethical deployment. Embracing such "constraints" is not opposition to progress but a necessary step to ensure technology benefits society broadly. The discussion sparked by Hyundai's workers, therefore, is not premature but essential.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot