South Korean Authorities Exclude Stablecoins From Corporate Crypto Investments – Details

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-08Actualizado a 2026-03-08

Resumen

South Korean financial regulators, led by the Financial Services Commission (FSC), are preparing to exclude stablecoins like USDT and USDC from the list of cryptocurrencies that publicly listed companies will be allowed to invest in. This decision is based on the country’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, which does not recognize stablecoins as legal external payment instruments. Allowing corporate investment in such assets could enable firms to bypass foreign exchange controls by making overseas payments directly via blockchain. The new guidelines will initially permit investments only in the top 20 non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies by market cap, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, with exposure potentially capped at 5% of a company’s capital. This marks a shift from South Korea’s earlier restrictive stance on corporate crypto trading, reflecting a gradual reopening of the market to institutional participants under tighter oversight.

South Korean authorities are reportedly moving to exclude stablecoins from an incoming framework that will allow listed companies to invest in cryptocurrencies. The decision is reportedly tied to existing foreign exchange laws, but reflects a cautious approach in permitting institutional exposure to the digital asset market.

South Korea’s FSC Leaves Stablecoins Out of Corporate Options

According to a report by local media, Herald Economy, South Korea’s financial regulators are leaning toward omitting US dollar–pegged stablecoins such as USDC and USDT from the list of digital assets that corporations will be allowed to hold once the guidelines take effect.

The regulatory pathway being designed by the nation’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is aimed at allowing publicly listed companies to invest in cryptocurrencies. However, regulators believe that including stablecoins in the approved investment list would conflict with the existing legal framework over cross-border payments.

For context, stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value by being pegged to a fiat currency, most commonly the US dollar. Tokens such as USDT and USDC typically maintain a 1:1 value with the dollar and are widely used for trading, settlements, and cross-border payments due to non-existent volatility compared with traditional cryptocurrencies.

However, South Korean regulators argue that these tokens are currently not recognized within the country’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, a law enacted in 1998 and implemented in 1999 to regulate currency flows and international payments. The legislation requires cross-border transactions to pass through designated foreign exchange banks and does not recognize stablecoins as legitimate external payment instruments.

Therefore, allowing companies to invest in stablecoins could potentially enable firms to bypass the country’s foreign exchange control system by conducting overseas payments directly through blockchain networks. Notably, South Korean corporations involved in international trade have expressed hope for stablecoin inclusion to hedge exchange-rate volatility and facilitate near-instant settlements. Nevertheless, the SFC appears inclined to maintain a conservative stance.

Corporate Crypto Access Expands, But With Limits

The proposed guidelines by the FSC will initially permit investments only in the top 20 non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, including assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Meanwhile, corporate exposure would potentially be capped within 5% of a company’s own capital, thus helping mitigate financial risks.

The move is part of a broader shift in South Korea’s digital asset policy. In 2017, authorities imposed strict restrictions on corporate participation in crypto trading amid concerns about speculation and money laundering. Nearly nine years later, regulators are gradually reopening the market to institutional investors under stricter oversight.

Meanwhile, the Asian country continues to refine its broader crypto regulatory framework. Bitcoinist recently reported that the FSC and the ruling party agreed to cap major shareholder stakes in domestic crypto exchanges to 20% in a bid battle governance risk and founder control.

Total crypto market cap valued at $2.27 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy are South Korean authorities excluding stablecoins from the list of approved corporate crypto investments?

ABecause stablecoins are not recognized as legitimate external payment instruments under South Korea's Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, and allowing corporate investment could enable firms to bypass the country's foreign exchange control system.

QWhich specific stablecoins are mentioned as being excluded from the corporate investment framework?

AUSDT (Tether) and USDC (USD Coin) are the specific dollar-pegged stablecoins mentioned.

QWhat is the primary reason cited by regulators for their cautious stance on stablecoins?

AThe primary reason is the conflict with existing foreign exchange laws, as stablecoins are not recognized within the country's Foreign Exchange Transactions Act which regulates cross-border payments.

QWhat are the proposed limits for corporate cryptocurrency investments under the new FSC guidelines?

AInvestments will initially be permitted only in the top 20 non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies by market cap, and corporate exposure will potentially be capped within 5% of a company's own capital.

QHow have South Korean corporations involved in international trade reacted to the exclusion of stablecoins?

AThey had expressed hope for stablecoin inclusion to hedge against exchange-rate volatility and facilitate near-instant settlements for international trade.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals Prediction markets are playing a significant role in the 2026 NBA Finals, particularly around the New York Knicks' unexpected 2-0 series lead. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen massive trading volumes, exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars on championship and related markets. Their influence extends beyond online trading. Kalshi's official partnership with Madison Square Garden has given it prominent physical branding at the arena. Furthermore, local businesses like The Jeffrey bar are using prediction market contracts to hedge the risk of game-result-based promotions, turning potential losses into manageable costs—a concept similar to the famous "Mattress Mack" strategy from traditional sports betting. These markets differentiate themselves by offering a wider, more entertainment-focused range of "event contracts" beyond typical game outcomes, such as predicting celebrity attendance. They also have broader accessibility across the U.S. compared to age- and location-restricted traditional sportsbooks. However, their rapid integration into sports raises regulatory and ethical questions. The NBA is cautiously engaging, discussing integrity frameworks with regulators like the CFTC. While the league permits minor investments like Giannis Antetokounmpo's stake in Kalshi, it advocates for strict rules to prevent insider trading. Many fans express concern on platforms like Reddit, fearing that the close ties between prediction markets, the league, and players could compromise the game's integrity. The NBA Finals has thus become a high-stakes testing ground, showcasing prediction markets' commercial potential while challenging traditional boundaries between financial trading, entertainment, and gambling.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Recursive Self-Improvement AI Gains Traction, Google Pours Cold Water, While DeepSeek and Others Approach the Fringes

The term "recursive self-improvement" (RSI), where AI improves itself autonomously, is gaining momentum in the AI industry. Startups like Recursive Superintelligence and projects such as Andrej Karpathy's Auto-Research aim to create systems where AI designs, implements, and validates its own research, moving toward superintelligence. While Google CEO Sundar Pichai cautions that such exponential acceleration is not yet a reality, progress is evident. For instance, Anthropic reported its Claude Code writes nearly 100% of the team's code, though it still lacks true self-direction. Analysts frame RSI development in stages: "adequacy" (systems functioning without humans), "parity" (matching human research quality), and "supremacy" (exceeding human-AI collaboration). Reaching parity could trigger rapid, unpredictable advancement due to AI's continuous operation. In China, companies like DeepSeek and Baidu incorporate self-optimization techniques without explicitly branding them as RSI, focusing on algorithmic efficiency and reinforcement learning. However, challenges remain, including "model collapse" from training on AI-generated data and the immense computational and open-collaboration requirements. Ultimately, RSI represents a trend of increasing automation in AI development, potentially reducing human oversight in the creation process itself.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Recursive Self-Improvement AI Gains Traction, Google Pours Cold Water, While DeepSeek and Others Approach the Fringes

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片