South Korea Announces Securities Tokenization Timeline: First Batch of Tokenized Assets to Include Bonds, Funds, and Unlisted Stocks

marsbitPublicado a 2026-09-05Actualizado a 2026-09-05

Resumen

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) has unveiled a three-phase roadmap for tokenizing securities, positioning itself as a potential first-mover with dedicated legislation. Following the formal enactment of amended laws in February 2027, Phase 1 will begin with tokenized private market assets, including bonds, institutional money market funds, and unlisted stocks (via trust beneficiary certificates). Existing licensed securities firms can operate without new permits, with specific rules for non-financial platform operators and investor limits. Phase 2 will expand to publicly issued securities, contingent on the stability of initial systems and market readiness. The final Phase 3 aims to enable on-chain settlement using stablecoins, pending separate stablecoin legislation. The announcement contrasts sharply with rapid, decentralized approaches like Robinhood's recent tokenization of stocks, which sparked controversy. South Korea's path prioritizes legal clarity and infrastructure, starting with controlled, institutional markets before broadening access. While this methodical approach may sacrifice speed, it seeks to establish a clear regulatory foundation. The global race for tokenization is highlighting divergent strategies between regulated, incremental models and faster, more open but less certain alternatives.

On September 4th, South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) held its third public-private joint consultation meeting on tokenized securities and unveiled a three-phase roadmap. The amendments to the "Electronic Securities Act" and the "Capital Market Act," passed on January 15, 2026, will officially take effect on February 4, 2027. At that time, South Korea will become the first major economy globally to explicitly define the legal status, asset categories, and infrastructure development timeline for securities tokenization through dedicated legislation.

The core principle of this roadmap is stated in the first paragraph: tokenized securities are recognized as the third form of issuance alongside paper securities and electronic securities, and they are subject to existing securities registration, information disclosure, and intermediary licensing regulations.

This signifies South Korea's choice to integrate tokenization into the existing securities law framework rather than creating a new regulatory sandbox for it.

Phase One: February 2027, Starting with Institutions and the Unlisted Market

The first phase will commence simultaneously with the enforcement of the amended laws. The asset categories to be opened have been carefully selected.

Regarding funds, private money market funds (Private MMF) dedicated to institutional investors will be opened first. For bonds, private corporate bonds will be opened. For equities, the entry point will be unlisted shares, utilizing a structure of trust beneficiary securities—the shares remain in the existing registration system, and investors receive tokenized trust interest certificates. Publicly offered fractional investment products are also included in the first batch.

Several supporting details are noteworthy.

Licensed securities companies and dealers can directly handle tokenized securities without requiring additional licenses. Non-financial institutions wishing to operate accounts for investors in their own tokenized securities must have a minimum paid-in capital of at least 40 billion won (approximately $3 million) and employ dedicated personnel for account management, compliance, and IT. OTC trading platforms must first obtain consultation approval from the Financial Supervisory Service. The annual net purchase limit for retail investors on OTC platforms is 100 million won (approximately $74,000). For fractional products, the single subscription limit is 30 million won (approximately $22,000) or 5% of the total issuance, whichever is lower.

The Korea Securities Depository (KSD) is finalizing technical acceptance standards for securities companies to connect to the shared ledger. The FSC plans to release a draft of the revised subordinate legislation by the end of September for public consultation.

Phase Two: Expanding to Publicly Issued Securities

The FSC has not set a specific date for the second phase. The advancement timeline depends on four variables: the system stability and operational efficiency of Phase One, the technical maturity of market participants, interoperability capabilities among different distributed ledgers, and progress in South Korea's stablecoin-related legislation.

The core expansion of this phase involves extending tokenization from the private market to publicly issued securities. The FSC also plans to refer to the tokenization pilot experiences of the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, with the Korea Exchange (KRX) leading the promotion of model verification and pilot projects for tokenizing listed stocks.

Phase Three: Introducing Stablecoins for On-Chain Settlement

The goal of the final phase is to establish on-chain settlement infrastructure, enabling the simultaneous completion of trading and fund settlement for tokenized securities on the same ledger, with stablecoins as the settlement instrument. The FSC cited BlackRock's BUIDL tokenized fund and Hong Kong's tokenized green bond as reference cases in the roadmap.

South Korea's stablecoin legislation is being advanced separately. The currently discussed proposal requires stablecoin issuers to hold a minimum capital of at least 50 billion won (approximately $3.7 million). The launch of Phase Three is contingent upon the establishment of the stablecoin legal framework.

Two Paths: Robinhood Runs First, South Korea Builds First

Placing South Korea's roadmap in the global context of this week reveals a stark contrast.

On the same day the FSC announced its roadmap, AMC Entertainment's CEO Adam Aron publicly criticized Robinhood's tokenization of AMC stock as "despicable," as meme coin traders on the Robinhood Chain had already driven the price of AMC's tokenized stock from above $2 to over $100.

Robinhood's model is: first wrap stocks in debt securities, place them on a permissionless blockchain to gain trading volume and users, and leave the legal implications for the market to digest.

South Korea is taking a path in the opposite direction. First, confirm the legal status of tokenized securities through legislation, then build custody and clearing infrastructure through the KSD, start with the institutional market and private products, verify system stability before gradually expanding to public securities, and only introduce on-chain settlement after stablecoin legislation is complete. Each step has clear preconditions and regulatory milestones.

Both paths come with costs. Robinhood gained speed and scale, reaching approximately $88 million in on-chain tokenized assets within two months and DEX daily trading volume exceeding $1.5 billion. However, it also garnered CEO feuds, potential SEC scrutiny, and a fundamental question: What is the legitimacy basis of this market when the tokenized company itself does not agree?

South Korea's path is almost certain not to produce "AMC-style" dramatic scenes. Its cost is speed: it takes a year from law passage to enforcement, Phase One only opens private products, and the timeline for public securities and on-chain settlement is completely undetermined. Boston Consulting Group estimates that South Korea's tokenized securities market could reach 367 trillion won (approximately $249 billion) by 2030, but this figure depends on how quickly Phases Two and Three can be implemented.

Within the same week, two extreme models of global securities tokenization emerged: one derailed its own brand by moving too fast, and the other risks missing the market window by being too cautious. The ultimately winning path will likely be a hybrid model: build infrastructure first, then gradually open access under regulation, while preserving DeFi composability. The EU's DLT Pilot Regime is exploring this direction, and Japan also announced a national blockchain settlement infrastructure plan for the early 2030s last week.

The race has just begun, but the shape of the track is becoming clear.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the key principle regarding tokenized securities outlined in South Korea's roadmap?

AThe core principle is that token securities are defined as the third formal method of issuance, alongside paper and electronic securities. They will be governed under the existing securities framework, including registration, disclosure, and intermediary licensing rules, rather than being placed in a new regulatory sandbox.

QWhat asset classes are planned for the first phase of South Korea's tokenized securities rollout in February 2027?

AThe first phase will focus on institutional and private markets. The asset classes include private Money Market Funds (MMF) for institutional investors, private corporate bonds, and non-listed equities structured as tokenized trust beneficiary certificates. Publicly offered fractional investment products are also included.

QWhat are the prerequisites for South Korea to proceed to the second phase of its tokenized securities roadmap?

AThe second phase, which expands to publicly issued securities, has no fixed date. Its progression depends on the stability and efficiency of systems from Phase 1, the technical maturity of market participants, the interoperability between different distributed ledgers, and the legislative progress regarding stablecoins in South Korea.

QWhat is the ultimate goal of the third phase in South Korea's tokenized securities roadmap, and what is its key dependency?

AThe goal of the third phase is to establish an on-chain settlement infrastructure, enabling simultaneous trading and settlement of tokenized securities on the same ledger using stablecoins as the settlement tool. Its launch is dependent on the finalization and enactment of South Korea's stablecoin legal framework.

QHow does the article contrast the approach of Robinhood with that of South Korea regarding tokenized securities?

AThe article contrasts Robinhood's fast-paced, market-first approach—which involves tokenizing assets like stocks on permissionless blockchains to gain users and trading volume while leaving legal definitions for later—with South Korea's deliberate, regulation-first strategy. South Korea is establishing clear legal status and infrastructure first, starting with controlled markets, and expanding gradually, prioritizing legal clarity and system stability over speed.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Changxin Stands Transistors Upright: A Path to Catch Up While Bypassing EUV — Will It Shake the Big Three Memory Makers?

ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) announced major progress in DRAM devices, 4F2 architecture, and hybrid bonding, briefly rattling the stocks of the three major memory makers. The key changes are the shift from the mainstream 6F2 cell architecture to 4F2, and the self-developed VSG (Vertical Surrounded Gate) transistor that enables it. In DRAM, each 1T1C cell pairs one transistor with one capacitor. Moving from 6F2 to 4F2 shrinks cell area by about one-third, allowing roughly 50% more cells in the same area—though chip-level density gains are lower (about 30–50%) because peripheral circuits do not shrink. 4F2 also relaxes design rules, reducing reliance on EUV by roughly two process generations, which matters greatly for CXMT, which cannot obtain EUV under export controls. It also eases capacitor manufacturing pressure. 4F2 is not unique to CXMT; all three major players are pursuing it. Samsung leads, targeting mass production around 2028; SK Hynix will likely adopt it one node later; Micron's plans are unclear and likely latest. CXMT says its first 4F2 product, a DDR5 RDIMM, will arrive by year-end, though volume and yield are unverified. Challenges include floating-body effects, difficult manufacturing sequences (epitaxy, backside processes, or hybrid bonding), array-periphery process decoupling, materials and resistance issues (molybdenum, ruthenium), and yield ramp. Short term (2026–2027), impact on supply-demand is limited. Medium to long term (post-2028), supply growth risks rise, potentially pressuring memory prices and the big three's profits, since conventional DDR drives most DRAM profit. CXMT gains an EUV-free catch-up path; Samsung may regain ground; SK Hynix's near-term position is safe; Micron looks relatively passive. Upstream equipment and materials suppliers may benefit.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Changxin Stands Transistors Upright: A Path to Catch Up While Bypassing EUV — Will It Shake the Big Three Memory Makers?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Japan’s Big Three Banks Test Joint Yen Stablecoin for Cross-Border Payments

Japan’s three largest banks have completed a joint trial of a yen-based stablecoin, confirming the feasibility of a model designed to support cross-border payments between businesses. Mizuho Bank, MUFG Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation conducted the proof of concept from July 17 to July 23, with results announced on October 16, 2026. Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation and technology firm TISI also participated. The trial focused on payments between Mitsubishi Corporation’s Japanese operations and its overseas locations, testing whether a stablecoin jointly issued by multiple banks could work within existing operational and regulatory requirements. The project received support from Japan’s Financial Services Agency through its FinTech Proof-of-Concept Hub in November 2025. Under the tested structure, Mizuho, MUFG and SMBC acted as joint principals responsible for commissioning the stablecoin issuance, while Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking served as trustee. The token was issued under a trust agreement as a form of specified trust beneficiary rights defined by Japan’s Payment Services Act. During the trial, participants examined the full process of issuing, transferring and redeeming the stablecoin, and assessed system performance, operational requirements and compliance measures, including anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing controls. Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking reviewed trust-related operations, trust asset management and user protection measures. TISI integrated the wallet infrastructure with the stablecoin issuance system, while SMBC provided the blockchain platform built with TISI. The proposed model is designed to support circulation across the customer networks of all three banks without a fixed issuance cap, and envisages managing trust assets through bank deposits. The companies noted these remain design assumptions that could change. The banks said the trial confirmed the feasibility of the joint issuance model and produced practical findings for future implementation. However, the stablecoin is not yet confirmed as commercially available. In June, the banks said they aimed to begin actual transactions during fiscal 2026, ending in March 2027. Participants will continue assessing outstanding issues, including user protection, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance and system stability, before moving toward practical use.

TheNewsCryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Japan’s Big Three Banks Test Joint Yen Stablecoin for Cross-Border Payments

TheNewsCryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片