South Dakota revives Bitcoin reserve plan with 10% allocation cap – Details

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-28Actualizado a 2026-01-28

Resumen

South Dakota Representative Logan Manhart has revived a legislative effort, House Bill 1155, to allow the state to allocate up to 10% of its revenues into Bitcoin. The bill includes strict security measures for storing private keys and represents a cautious, incremental approach to treating Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset. This move aligns with a growing trend among states like Texas, Arizona, and New Hampshire, which are pursuing their own digital asset strategies amid delays in federal action. The proposal underscores a shift toward state-level adoption as a long-term inflation hedge, reflecting the broader bullish market sentiment around Bitcoin.

While Washington dangles the promise of a federal strategic reserve, South Dakota is tired of waiting.

Representative Logan Manhart (R) has officially revived a legislative push that could fundamentally alter the state’s balance sheet.

On the 27th of January, Manhart introduced House Bill 1155, an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin.

South Dakota’s second Bitcoin Reserve attempt

The move is more than just a second attempt at a stalled 2025 proposal.

If passed, HB 1155 would not just allow South Dakota to hold Bitcoin [BTC] but also require strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

By limiting the allocation to 10%, the state is taking a cautious, step-by-step approach.

The goal is to gradually treat Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset, similar to what Texas and Arizona are already doing. Thus, reintroducing HB 1155 shows that South Dakota’s view of digital assets is evolving.

Other states and their Bitcoin Reserve plans

South Dakota isn’t the only state that’s tired of waiting around for Washington, as several other states are also moving in the same direction.

New Hampshire already allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets, while Texas and Arizona have passed laws to include Bitcoin in state reserves.

Florida is also considering a similar bill aimed at using digital assets as an inflation hedge.

However, at the federal level, creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is still a key goal for the current administration.

Patrick Witt, Director of the White House Crypto Council, has already acknowledged that legal complications have slowed progress.

As a result, the federal plan currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

What’s more?

This came at a time when BTC was trading around $89,199 at press time as per CoinMarketCap, with the Bitcoin crypto sentiment standing bullish at 81%.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin Dominance also stood at 59.55% as per TradingView, reflecting continued investor preference for the asset.

All this put together showed that the market entered 2026 with a focus on fundamentals. And with this bill, South Dakota is choosing to act rather than wait.


Final Thoughts

  • Rather than chasing price, South Dakota is legislating infrastructure for long-term exposure.
  • HB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states testing Bitcoin before federal execution materializes.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of House Bill 1155 introduced in South Dakota?

AHouse Bill 1155 is an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin, treating it as a legitimate public asset.

QHow does South Dakota's proposed Bitcoin allocation compare to the approach of other states like New Hampshire?

ASouth Dakota's bill allows for an allocation of up to 10% of state revenues, which is a higher cap than New Hampshire, which allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets.

QWhat security measures are mandated for Bitcoin holdings under the proposed South Dakota bill?

AThe bill requires strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

QWhat is the current status of the federal government's plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve according to the article?

AThe federal plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has been slowed by legal complications and currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

QWhat broader trend does the reintroduction of HB 1155 represent among U.S. states?

AHB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states like Texas, Arizona, and Florida testing Bitcoin integration and creating infrastructure for long-term exposure before a federal execution materializes.

Lecturas Relacionadas

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片