Solana on trial: How Pump.fun could shake up the network

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-18Actualizado a 2025-12-18

Resumen

The year 2025 has seen memecoins achieve mainstream adoption. Solana solidified its position as a leading network for this high-speed, speculative activity with coins like TRUMP and MELANIA. However, a federal court has now approved a class-action lawsuit against Pump.fun, Solana Labs, and other entities, accusing them of market manipulation. This lawsuit uniquely targets Solana's core technology, specifically its high-speed, high-throughput network. The legal challenge focuses on how the network's internal validator setup allegedly allowed insiders to manipulate memecoin launches on the Pump.fun platform. A key piece of evidence is the extreme supply concentration, where the top 10 holders control approximately 70% of the PUMP token's supply, sidelining retail investors and capping the price. While PUMP's price volatility and its trading below its ICO price are symptoms, the lawsuit presents a significant threat to the entire Solana ecosystem by placing its foundational technology under legal scrutiny.

2025 has been a breakout year for memecoins, pushing them into mainstream adoption. From Dogecoin’s [DOGE] ETF launch to the Bonk [BONK] ETP hype, all of this is forcing investors to rethink speculative bets.

Solana [SOL] memecoins followed closely behind. Launches like Official Trump [TRUMP] and Melania Meme [MELANIA] reinforced Solana’s reputation as the “go-to” network for high-speed, speculative activity.

However, all that fun is now under the legal microscope. Recently, a federal court green-lit a class-action lawsuit against Pump.fun, Solana Labs, and other Solana-linked projects, accusing them of market manipulation.

The key part? This isn’t your usual courtroom drama.

Instead, the accusations hit right at Solana’s core tech. Simply put, it wasn’t just bad timing or clever positioning that let insiders get ahead on memecoin launches. Rather, the lawsuit is targeting the network itself.

Specifically, the “high-speed, high-throughput” network that powers it all. This isn’t just about a few memecoins anymore. Instead, the entire Solana ecosystem and everyone involved could be in the spotlight.

Solana’s legal troubles

Solana Labs is now under the microscope for its internal validator setup.

Basically, the way the network-powered Pump.fun (a memecoin launchpad) that let millions of memecoins be created, traded, and moved lightning-fast on Solana, is now being legally challenged, as explained by a top analyst.

The result? Supply becomes super concentrated. As the chart below shows, the top 10 HODLers control around 70% of PUMP’s circulating supply, leaving retail stuck on the sidelines while the price stays capped.

Based on this, plaintiffs have now taken the case to federal court.

From a technical standpoint, PUMP’s volatility speaks for itself. It’s trading roughly 3.15% below its $0.02 ICO price, and insiders are being called out for keeping supply tight to manipulate prices and leave retail underwater.

However, at the end of the day, PUMP is just a symptom of a bigger issue with Solana’s network, not the problem itself. That’s why the possibility of Solana cracking under legal scrutiny is becoming a real concern.

Final Thoughts

  • The recent lawsuit targets Solana’s high-speed, high-throughput network, putting the entire ecosystem and insiders under legal scrutiny.
  • The top 10 holders control 70% of PUMP, keeping retail sidelined while price manipulation allegations mount.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of the class-action lawsuit against Pump.fun and Solana Labs?

AThe lawsuit focuses on accusations of market manipulation, specifically targeting Solana's core high-speed, high-throughput network technology that enabled insiders to gain advantages in memecoin launches.

QHow has the supply of PUMP tokens been concentrated according to the article?

AThe top 10 holders control approximately 70% of PUMP's circulating supply, leading to allegations of price manipulation and leaving retail investors at a disadvantage.

QWhat role did Solana's internal validator setup play in the legal challenges?

ASolana Labs is under scrutiny for its internal validator setup, which powered Pump.fun and allowed millions of memecoins to be created, traded, and moved rapidly on the network, now facing legal challenges for enabling these activities.

QWhat is PUMP's current trading performance mentioned in the article?

APUMP is trading roughly 3.15% below its $0.02 ICO price, highlighting its volatility and the issues surrounding price manipulation by insiders.

QWhy is the lawsuit considered a threat to the entire Solana ecosystem?

AThe lawsuit targets Solana's foundational technology, not just individual memecoins, putting the entire ecosystem and everyone involved under legal scrutiny and raising concerns about the network's stability.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Iran’s Crypto Lifeline Hit As US Freezes $344 Million In Funds

The US Treasury has frozen $344 million in cryptocurrency tied to Iranian military and political groups, specifically targeting two Tron blockchain wallets connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Hizballah. This action follows reports that Iran was collecting Bitcoin payments from ships for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. The freeze occurred just one day after stablecoin issuer Tether locked the same amount of funds at the request of US law enforcement. The move is part of broader US efforts to disrupt Iran's ability to generate and move funds, highlighting the limitations of using cryptocurrency as a sanctions workaround when centralized issuers comply with enforcement actions.

bitcoinistHace 16 min(s)

Iran’s Crypto Lifeline Hit As US Freezes $344 Million In Funds

bitcoinistHace 16 min(s)

Amidst the Volatility in the Crypto Market, Who is Buying Against the Trend?

"In a volatile crypto market downturn of Q1 2026, institutional players demonstrated divergent strategies. While Bitcoin fell over 25% and Ethereum dropped 35%, key institutions accumulated: corporate treasuries like Strategy (MicroStrategy) added over $10 billion in BTC, sovereign wealth funds like Mubadala increased IBIT holdings by 46%, and major banks launched crypto services and ETFs. Notably, 26 new crypto ETFs were filed or launched under streamlined SEC rules, including bank-led products from Morgan Stanley and BlackRock’s staking ETH ETF. VC funding saw concentration: total investment reached ~$5 billion, but deal count plummeted 49%. Three mega-deals—BVNK ($1.8B), Kalshi ($1B), and Polymarket ($600M)—accounted for half the quarter’s funding. Investment shifted from DeFi/NFTs to payments, prediction markets, and regulated CeFi infrastructure. Selling pressure came from hedge funds (e.g., Brevan Howard cut IBIT by 85%) and Bitcoin miners liquidating holdings. The U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve saw zero additions, highlighting that real buying came from corporations and sovereign funds, not governments. The institutional crypto landscape is bifurcating: long-term holders accumulate while short-term traders exit, signaling a foundation for the next cycle."

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Amidst the Volatility in the Crypto Market, Who is Buying Against the Trend?

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar PUMP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Big Pump (PUMP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Big Pump (PUMP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Big Pump (PUMP)Después de comprar tu Big Pump (PUMP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Big Pump (PUMP)Tradear fácilmente con Big Pump (PUMP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

221 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Cómo comprar PUMP

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de PUMP (PUMP).

活动图片