Solana drops 15%, hits 2-year low: Can SOL bulls hold $70?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-06Actualizado a 2026-02-06

Resumen

Solana (SOL) experienced a sharp decline, dropping 15% and hitting a two-year low of $67 before slightly recovering to around $81. The broader cryptocurrency market downturn contributed to significant liquidations, with one whale losing $6.7 million on a SOL long position and over $167 million in long positions liquidated in two days. This forced selling intensified downward pressure. Despite some investors buying the dip—evidenced by a net outflow of $101 million from exchanges—selling momentum remains strong. SOL’s RSI fell to 21, indicating oversold conditions and potential further decline unless buyers can push the price above the Parabolic SAR level of $103.

The cryptocurrency market extended its decline, with total capitalization falling to $2.2 trillion. Altcoins, particularly Solana [SOL], suffered steep losses.

Solana dropped 15%, breaking below $70 and hitting a two‐year low of $67 before rebounding slightly to $81.6. At the time of writing, SOL was trading at $80.78, down 10.44% on the daily charts.

At the same time, its market capitalization fell below $50 billion, indicating substantial capital outflows.

Solana whale fully liquidated amid market dip

Amid this downside volatility, whale investors in the futures market, especially those taking long positions, experienced forced liquidations.

According to Onchain Lens, a whale got completely liquidated on its SOL long position, losing $6.7 million. Overall, the whale lost over $16 million during the current market decline.

Significantly, this whale is not an isolated case. In fact, over $167 million in long positions were liquidated between February 5 and 6.

Usually, forced selling exerts immediate selling pressure on the market, further accelerating the asset’s downward momentum.

Thus, these liquidations exacerbated market stress, causing Solana to decline further, particularly given the current market weakness.

However, in response to this liquidation threat, investors have changed strategy and increased short positions. According to CoinGlass data, the Long Short ratio fell below 1 to 0.96 at press time.

A ratio below 1 indicates that most traders across all exchanges have taken short positions, anticipating further losses. However, Binance and OKX remain among the top traders, with the Long-Short ratio averaging 3.0.

Is SOL’s bottom in yet?

Solana declined further as forced selling in futures markets created additional selling pressure on an already weakened market structure.

At the same time, the altcoin jumped back above $80, as investors took the slip below $70 as an opportunity to buy the dip on the spot.

As such, the altcoin’s Netflow dropped to November 2025 levels, falling to -$101 million on the 5th of February. Notably, over $7 billion worth of SOL flowed out of exchanges, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

Despite this, the purchases have remained insufficient to offset market conditions, and sellers have retained complete control. In fact, the altcoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) fell deeper into the oversold zone, dropping to 21 as of writing.

With momentum indicators dropping to such a level, this suggested strong downward momentum, with buyers entirely displaced. Equally, it indicated a potential continuation of the prevailing trend.

Therefore, if these conditions persist, SOL could drop again below $70. For a trend reversal, buyers must keep up and reclaim the altcoin’s Parabolic SAR at $103.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana crashed to a 2-year low of $65 before rebounding to a high of $81.
  • Solana whale was fully liquidated on its Sol long positions, resulting in $6.7 million in losses and raising total losses to $16 million.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the lowest price Solana (SOL) hit during the recent market decline, and what was its price at the time of writing?

ASolana hit a two-year low of $67 before rebounding slightly. At the time of writing, it was trading at $80.78.

QHow much did a Solana whale lose after being fully liquidated on its long position, and what was its total loss during the market decline?

AThe whale lost $6.7 million from its fully liquidated SOL long position, raising its total losses to over $16 million during the market decline.

QWhat does a Long/Short ratio below 1 indicate about trader sentiment in the market?

AA Long/Short ratio below 1 indicates that the majority of traders across exchanges have taken short positions, anticipating further price declines.

QWhat key on-chain metric suggested aggressive spot accumulation of SOL, and what was its value?

AThe Netflow dropped to -$101 million on February 5th, with over $7 billion worth of SOL flowing out of exchanges, which is a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

QAccording to the analysis, what price level must buyers reclaim to signal a potential trend reversal for SOL?

ABuyers must reclaim the altcoin's Parabolic SAR at the $103 level to signal a potential trend reversal.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片