Silk Road-linked Bitcoin wallets move $3M to new address

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

Cryptocurrency wallets associated with the defunct darknet marketplace Silk Road have transferred approximately $3.14 million in Bitcoin to a new address, marking their most significant activity in five years. The funds were moved from wallets still holding an estimated $38.4 million in BTC. This activity follows the January pardon of Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht by former U.S. President Donald Trump. While the U.S. government previously seized billions in Bitcoin from Silk Road, industry observers believe Ulbricht may still control additional wallets containing tens of millions in unrecovered cryptocurrency.

Darknet marketplace Silk Road-linked cryptocurrency wallets are moving again, less than a year after US President Donald Trump granted its founder, Ross Ulbricht, a full pardon.

Silk Road-tagged cryptocurrency wallets awoke Tuesday to transfer approximately $3.14 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC), according to blockchain data platform Arkham.

The 176 transfers mark the wallet’s most significant activity in five years. Silk Road-related wallets executed only three small test transactions earlier this year.

The transfers were all made to an unknown cryptocurrency wallet “bc1qn.” The primary Silk Road–tagged wallets still hold about $38.4 million in Bitcoin, while the newly created address is holding only the $3.14 million received in the recent transactions.

Cointelegraph was unable to independently verify the owner of the new wallet and has reached out to Ulbricht for comment.

Silk Road wallets, token holdings. Source: Arkham

Related: Crypto nears its ‘Netscape moment’ as industry approaches inflection point

In January, Trump gave a full pardon to Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, who had been serving a double life sentence without parole.

Ulbricht was convicted in 2015 for his role in creating and operating Silk Road, a darknet marketplace that facilitated the anonymous trade of illicit goods using Bitcoin.

Source: Free_Ross

Following the pardon, supporters have contributed approximately $270,000 in Bitcoin donations to the Free Ross campaign, according to onchain data.

Related: ‘Elite’ traders hunt dopamine-seeking retail on prediction markets: 10x Research

Silk Road founder may still hold millions in unseized crypto wallets

While the US government seized at least $3.36 billion in Bitcoin from Silk Road, some industry watchers claim that Ross had multiple other Bitcoin wallets that weren’t discovered during the asset seizure.

Coinbase exchange director Conor Grogan revealed that 430 BTC, worth about $47 million, remains untouched in wallets likely linked to Ulbricht, which have been dormant for over 13 years.

Silk Road wallet “1cqvW,” holdings. Source: Arkham

Another Silk Road-tagged wallet likely belonging to Ulbricht holds $8.3 million in Bitcoin. Barring three small test transactions in the past 10 months, the wallet has been inactive for 14 years, according to Arkham.

Magazine: $3.4B of Bitcoin in a popcorn tin — The Silk Road hacker’s story

Related Reads

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

Alliance DAO founder qw (@QwQiao) sparked intense debate in the crypto community by claiming that Layer 1 blockchains have "limited moats," rating them only 3/10 in terms of sustainable competitive advantage. This triggered strong reactions from key industry figures. Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb strongly disagreed, arguing that Ethereum’s decade-long dominance despite well-funded challengers proves its strong moat. Others, like Multicoin’s Kyle Samani and researchers from Ethereum and Circle, questioned whether liquidity alone constitutes a real moat, with some calling it fleeting and unreliable. In response, qw elaborated on his moat rating framework, giving traditional giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Visa perfect scores (10/10) based on revenue models and infrastructure, while rating top crypto projects around 5/10. He notably rated Bitcoin at 9/10, citing its unique founding story and Lindy effect, but deducted a point due to uncertainties around security and quantum threats. The debate expanded into what truly constitutes a moat in crypto. Critics argued qw’s framework overemphasizes current revenue and undervalues network effects, trust, and technological ethos. Defenders of blockchain moats pointed to elements like developer ecosystems, brand strength, switching costs, and application diversity as core defensive attributes. The article concludes that the crypto industry is still young and small compared to traditional finance and tech giants. Rather than fixating on abstract moat concepts, the priority should be solving real user needs at scale, driving adoption, and expanding overall market reach.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片