Should Bitcoin rush its move to post-quantum cryptography?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-04-08Actualizado a 2026-04-08

Resumen

The Bitcoin community is divided on the urgency of migrating to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) by the 2029 deadline. JAN3 founder Samson Mow warns against rushing untested PQC solutions, arguing it could expose Bitcoin to attacks from classical computers, reduce transaction throughput due to larger signature sizes, and potentially introduce hidden backdoors. He advocates for solving the quantum computing (QC) problem later rather than sooner. This debate follows a Google Quantum AI report suggesting quantum processors could break Bitcoin's encryption sooner than previously estimated, potentially requiring only 1,200–1,450 logical qubits. Google urges a PQC upgrade by 2029 to protect nearly 7 million BTC. In contrast, figures like Adam Back and Grayscale's Zach Pandl believe practical quantum computers are still years away, posing no immediate threat. However, they agree efforts to prepare for a post-quantum future should accelerate. The issue is complicated by Bitcoin's history of contentious protocol changes and potential for significant technical trade-offs.

The Bitcoin community is divided on whether there is really a need to rush to meet the 2029 deadline of migrating to a quantum-secure network.

For his part, Samsom Mow, founder of JAN3, an advisory for nation-state BTC adoption, has warned against a hurried push for untested and unverified post-quantum (PQ) solutions. He cautioned that,

Solving the QC problem later rather than sooner is the best course of action.

AD
Source: X/Samson Mow

Mow slammed Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s call for a ‘sooner’ PQ upgrade. He stated that it could expose BTC to attack from current classical computers.

Additionally, the proposed PQ solutions would reduce Bitcoin transactions due to larger block sizes.

PQ signatures will likely be 10-125x larger than current ones, and massively reduce throughput. Possibly paving the way for Blocksize Wars 2.0.

In fact, Solana, one of the fastest blockchains, has reported a potential 90% slowdown if current PQ solutions are implemented.

Finally, Mow pointed out the possibility of the U.S. NSA (National Security Agency) pushing current PQ solutions as standards with hidden ‘backdoors’ to infiltrate future systems.

Google urges fast PQ Bitcoin upgrade before 2029

The renewed debate follows a recent report by Google Quantum AI, which found that Bitcoin and most blockchain encryption could be broken sooner than earlier estimates suggested.

According to the findings, advanced quantum processors may require around 500,000 physical qubits or 1,200–1,450 stable logical qubits to compromise crypto security.

This was contrary to the prior estimates of millions of qubits. Google had urged a PQ upgrade by 2029 to prevent nearly 7 million BTC from being at risk.

In short, there is less than three years before further quantum advancement threatens BTC.

Bitcoin’s history complicates this. Protocol changes often take time and spark disagreement.

In fact, Charles Edwards of Capriole Investment projected that BTC will never reach a new all-time high unless it migrates to PQ.

However, some crypto and cypherpunks like Adam Back still hold that physical quantum computers are years away from hitting the market despite recent advancements.

Grayscale’s head of research, Zach Pandl, reinforced a similar stance and noted,

Investors should not fret. In our view, there is no security threat to public blockchains from quantum computers today. But it’s time to accelerate efforts to prepare for our post-quantum future.

Source: Grayscale

Apart from the Satoshi-era and Taproot wallets, most investors have migrated to relatively more resistant addresses (Segwit, P2WPKH).


Final Summary

  • Jan3’s Samson Mow blasted Coinbase CEO for rushed push for PQ upgrade for Bitcoin, citing transfer speed risks and further attacks.
  • Grayscale said QC was not a problem just yet, but urged players to accelerate PQ upgrades.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main point of disagreement within the Bitcoin community regarding post-quantum cryptography?

AThe Bitcoin community is divided on whether there is a need to rush to meet the 2029 deadline for migrating to a quantum-secure network, with some warning against hurriedly implementing untested solutions.

QAccording to Samson Mow, what are the two main risks of rushing a post-quantum upgrade for Bitcoin?

ASamson Mow warned that a rushed upgrade could expose Bitcoin to attacks from current classical computers and that the proposed solutions would reduce transaction throughput due to significantly larger signature sizes.

QWhat did the Google Quantum AI report find regarding the threat to Bitcoin's encryption?

AThe Google Quantum AI report found that advanced quantum processors may require far fewer qubits than previously estimated (around 500,000 physical or 1,200–1,450 stable logical qubits) to compromise crypto security, urging an upgrade by 2029.

QWhat is the stance of Grayscale's head of research, Zach Pandl, on the quantum computing threat?

AZach Pandl stated that quantum computers pose no security threat to public blockchains today, but he urged the community to accelerate efforts to prepare for a post-quantum future.

QWhat potential negative impact did Samson Mow suggest a post-quantum upgrade could have on Bitcoin's network?

AMow suggested that post-quantum signatures, being 10-125x larger than current ones, would massively reduce transaction throughput and could potentially lead to a 'Blocksize Wars 2.0'.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Hace 23 min(s)

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Hace 23 min(s)

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar MOVE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Movement (MOVE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Movement (MOVE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Movement (MOVE)Después de comprar tu Movement (MOVE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Movement (MOVE)Tradear fácilmente con Movement (MOVE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

312 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar MOVE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de MOVE (MOVE).

活动图片