Securitize announces ‘real’ tokenized stocks, touts DeFi integration

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-17Actualizado a 2025-12-17

Resumen

Securitize has announced plans to launch what it claims will be the first compliant, on-chain trading experience for tokenized public stocks, representing real share ownership rather than synthetic exposure. The product, expected in Q1 2026, will use tokens issued directly on the issuer’s cap table and recorded onchain. Trading will occur through a DeFi-style swap interface, enabling real-time transactions even outside traditional market hours. The company criticized existing tokenized stock offerings for lacking true ownership, compliance, and proper KYC/AML controls, often relying on offshore structures. In contrast, Securitize emphasizes regulatory compliance, whitelisted wallets, and its role as an SEC-registered transfer agent to ensure tokens represent legally recognized shares. Beyond faster settlement, the firm highlights programmability—enabling integration with DeFi and smart contracts while maintaining investor protections—as a key upgrade to traditional finance.

Securitize, a company focused on tokenizing securities, said Tuesday it plans to launch what it calls the first compliant, onchain trading experience for public stocks that are issued as tokens representing real share ownership.

According to the announcement, Securitize’s stock product is expected to launch in the first quarter of 2026. The company said the offering is designed to avoid structures that mirror stock prices without conveying ownership, and instead, the tokens “are real, regulated shares: issued onchain, recorded directly on the issuer’s cap table.”

It also said trading will be presented in a “swap-style” interface familiar to users of decentralized finance, or decentralized finance (DeFi).

Securitize argued that natively tokenized public stocks, in which tokens represent actual stock ownership, were held onchain but mostly traded through traditional offchain processes. Its pitch is that buyers and sellers will be able to trade “fully on-chain” in real time, including during hours when traditional markets are closed.

Securitize’s tokenized stock trading user interface. Source: Securitize

Related: Binance hints at stock perps in push to join global tokenized equities race

A compliant tokenized stock ecosystem

Securitize criticized the recent wave of tokenized stock products, claiming they “offer exposure, not ownership.” The company said some products rely on special-purpose vehicles or offshore structures that can add counterparty risk or create pricing mismatches.

It also criticized tokenized stock products, which it said “are not even compliant, since they are issued as permissionless assets without Know Your Customer (KYC) or Anti-Money Laundering (AML) controls.

Still, the company notes that traditional stock infrastructure is antiquated and needs disintermediation and rebuilding, with investors rarely holding “shares in their own name, settlement takes at least a day.”

“If tokenization is going to matter at public-market scale, it must deliver ownership, real securities and maintain investor protections.“

Securitize said its approach is built around regulated securities and compliance requirements, including controls that limit transfers to approved, or whitelisted, wallets.

Related: Ondo wins Liechtenstein approval to offer tokenized stocks in Europe

Regulated shares make their way to DeFi

Securitize said it will act as the transfer agent for the shares, describing itself as registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Transfer agents maintain shareholder records and process changes in ownership. By pairing that role with blockchain-based issuance, the company said the tokens would be legally recognized shares rather than a proxy claim.

Securitize downplayed faster settlement as the main selling point, saying the larger opportunity is programmability, or the ability for tokenized securities to interact with smart contracts and onchain financial applications.

It further argued that this programmability allows tokenized securities to be integrated with DeFi platforms “without compromising compliance or user protections.”

“This is not about replacing traditional finance. It’s about upgrading it,“ Securitize said.

Lecturas Relacionadas

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片