SEC’s Crypto Advocate Says Blockchain Code Is Protected By The Constitution

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-06-05Actualizado a 2026-06-05

Resumen

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce argued that publishing open-source blockchain code is a protected activity under the First Amendment and developers should not be automatically liable as securities intermediaries for how others use their software. She emphasized that liability should fall on those who engage in unlawful conduct, not the tool creators. Her remarks reflect a broader regulatory shift at the SEC under Chair Paul Atkins, moving away from regulation by enforcement. The agency's Crypto Task Force is reviewing how existing securities laws, designed for traditional intermediaries, apply to decentralized systems. Recent SEC guidance also suggested some platforms accessing decentralized protocols may not qualify as traditional brokers. The SEC's strategic plan through 2030 indicates blockchain and crypto assets remain a long-term priority as potentially transformative technologies for financial infrastructure.

A federal securities regulator is drawing a line between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how that code gets used — and the distinction could reshape how the government treats software developers in the decentralized finance space.

Broader Regulatory Shift Behind The Remarks

Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, made the case Tuesday at the IC3 Blockchain Camp at Princeton University that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment.

She argued that developers who release DeFi code should not be automatically classified as securities intermediaries just because other people use what they built.

Legal liability, she said, should fall on those who actually engage in unlawful conduct — not on the people who wrote the underlying tools.

Peirce’s remarks fit into a wider rethinking underway at the SEC since Chair Paul Atkins took the helm.

Source: SEC

The agency has been pulling back from what Atkins has described as regulation by enforcement, with its Crypto Task Force now reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems.

Peirce, a long-standing voice for clearer rules in the crypto space, has been central to that push.

Rules Built For A Different World

She pointed to the SEC’s rulebook as evidence of the problem. The agency’s regulations were designed around intermediaries — brokers, dealers, exchanges, clearinghouses, transfer agents, investment advisers, and investment companies.

Peirce questioned whether those same rules make sense when applied to distributed blockchain networks that exist for purposes well beyond securities transactions.

Her comments came weeks after SEC staff issued separate guidance addressing broker-dealer registration requirements for certain user interfaces.

BTCUSD now trading at $62,332. Chart: TradingView

That guidance indicated some front-end websites and software platforms that provide access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition — a signal that the agency is rethinking how far its existing categories can stretch.

Digital Assets As Long-Term Priority

The SEC has also signaled that crypto and blockchain technology will remain a focus for years ahead. In its draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030, the agency described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America’s financial infrastructure.

Taken together, the staff guidance, the strategic plan, and Peirce’s speech at Princeton paint a picture of an agency trying to redraw boundaries that were never clearly set.

Featured image from Pixabay, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, what activity related to blockchain software is protected under the First Amendment?

AHester Peirce stated that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment.

QWhat key distinction is Hester Peirce drawing regarding blockchain code developers and legal liability?

AShe is drawing a distinction between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how it is used, arguing that legal liability should fall on those who engage in unlawful conduct, not necessarily on the developers who created the underlying tools.

QWhat broader regulatory shift at the SEC does Peirce's speech fit into?

AHer remarks fit into a wider rethinking at the SEC, led by Chair Paul Atkins, which is moving away from regulation by enforcement. The agency's Crypto Task Force is reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems.

QWhat recent SEC guidance suggests the agency is rethinking the application of traditional broker-dealer rules?

ARecent SEC staff guidance indicated that some front-end websites and software platforms providing access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition.

QHow does the SEC's draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030 characterize blockchain and crypto assets?

AThe SEC's draft Strategic Plan described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America's financial infrastructure, signaling they will remain a long-term priority.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum down 45% YTD – So why do SharpLink and whales keep buying?

Despite Ethereum (ETH) being down 20-45% year-to-date amid broader crypto weakness, institutional and whale buying activity suggests growing long-term conviction. SharpLink, after an eight-month pause, purchased 5,000 ETH and later added $45.54 million in LSETH, increasing its total holdings significantly despite substantial unrealized losses. Similarly, a new whale wallet accumulated over 18,000 ETH worth $28.9 million in nine days, indicating strategic positioning for future price movements rather than short-term trading. However, this accumulation contrasts with spot Ethereum ETFs, which saw net outflows of $12.85 million recently, highlighting a divergence between direct treasury/whale buyers and ETF investors. While the persistent buying from these large holders may gradually ease selling pressure, a sustained recovery for Ethereum still depends on a reversal in ETF flows and a broader improvement in network demand and market sentiment.

ambcryptoHace 7 min(s)

Ethereum down 45% YTD – So why do SharpLink and whales keep buying?

ambcryptoHace 7 min(s)

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

DeepSeek has updated its DeepSeek V4 model with the DSpark speculative decoding framework, achieving a significant 60-85% speedup in generation for Flash models and 57-78% for Pro models while maintaining the same overall throughput. This engineering-focused update, rather than a core architectural change, introduces DSpark to address latency and throughput bottlenecks in high-concurrency production environments. DSpark combines high-throughput parallel generation with adaptive load-aware verification. Its key innovations include a semi-autoregressive generation architecture to model dependencies within token blocks and a hardware-aware confidence-scheduled verification system. This system uses a confidence head to predict token acceptance probabilities, allowing it to dynamically optimize verification length per request and allocate compute only to tokens with the highest expected payoff. The asynchronous scheduler is designed for real-world deployment, ensuring zero-overhead scheduling and continuous CUDA graph replay while preserving the target model's output distribution. In tests across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and daily dialogue, DSpark outperformed state-of-the-art models like Eagle3 and DFlash, increasing average acceptance length by 26.7%-30.9% and 16.3%-18.4% respectively on Qwen3 target models. DeepSeek also open-sourced DeepSpec, a full-stack codebase for training and evaluating speculative decoding draft models, providing a standardized toolkit that includes data preparation tools, model implementations, training code, and evaluation scripts.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Aavenomics 3.0 sustain AAVE’s recovery rally amid Kraken buyout talks?

Aave Labs CEO Stani Kulechov has dismissed reports of a potential stake sale to Kraken, clarifying that Aave would not sell at a significant discount. He highlighted Aave's substantial annualized revenue and its focus on a broad financial market. Kulechov also announced plans for Aavenomics 3.0, featuring a new automated buyback mechanism. Following these updates, the AAVE token price surged 12%, extending its June recovery rally to over 50% from its recent lows. The rally is partly attributed to reduced selling pressure and positive sentiment from the announced tokenomics plan, despite the token remaining significantly below its all-time high.

ambcryptoHace 2 hora(s)

Can Aavenomics 3.0 sustain AAVE’s recovery rally amid Kraken buyout talks?

ambcryptoHace 2 hora(s)

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片