SEC says most crypto assets are not securities in new regulatory framework

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-17Actualizado a 2026-03-17

Resumen

The U.S. SEC, in coordination with the CFTC, issued new guidance on March 17, 2026, clarifying that most crypto assets are not securities. The framework introduces a taxonomy classifying digital assets into five categories: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and digital securities. It emphasizes that a crypto asset itself may not be a security, even if involved in an investment contract, and that its regulatory status can change over time. The guidance also addresses staking, airdrops, mining, and asset wrapping, reducing uncertainty for market participants. This move signals improved regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC, providing clearer rules for builders, issuers, and investors.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued a sweeping new interpretation clarifying how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, stating that most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

Announced on 17 March 2026, the guidance marks one of the most significant regulatory developments in the U.S. crypto market in over a decade.

The move was issued in coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, signaling a more unified approach to overseeing digital assets.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the interpretation aims to “draw clear lines in clear terms,” while acknowledging that earlier regulatory approaches had failed to provide sufficient clarity for market participants.

SEC introduces crypto asset taxonomy

At the center of the new framework is a formal classification system for digital assets. The SEC outlined five broad categories:

  • Digital commodities
  • Digital collectibles
  • Digital tools
  • Stablecoins
  • Digital securities

The taxonomy is designed to help market participants better understand how different types of crypto assets are treated under U.S. law, addressing a long-standing lack of consistent definitions across the industry.

Investment contracts can evolve—and end

A key element of the interpretation is the clarification that a crypto asset itself may not be a security, even if it is involved in an investment contract at some stage.

The SEC stated that a “non-security crypto asset” can become subject to securities laws through an investment contract, but that such arrangements can also cease over time.

This distinction introduces a more dynamic view of regulation, where an asset’s legal status may change depending on how it is offered, marketed, and used.

Clarity on staking, airdrops, and mining

The guidance also addresses several core crypto activities that have previously existed in regulatory grey areas.

These include:

  • Airdrops
  • Protocol mining
  • Protocol staking
  • The wrapping of non-security crypto assets

By outlining how securities laws apply to these activities, the SEC is attempting to reduce uncertainty for developers, platforms, and users operating across decentralized networks.

SEC and CFTC align on oversight

The joint nature of the interpretation highlights growing coordination between the SEC and the CFTC, which have historically taken different approaches to crypto regulation.

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said the guidance reflects a shared commitment to creating “workable, harmonized regulations” for the industry.

The alignment is expected to clarify jurisdictional boundaries, particularly between assets treated as commodities and those subject to securities laws.

Market implications

The interpretation is likely to have wide-ranging implications for the crypto industry.

For builders and issuers, the framework provides clearer guidance on structuring projects and token distributions. For investors, it offers greater transparency around how assets may be classified and regulated.

The SEC said the interpretation also serves as a bridge as Congress continues its efforts to establish a comprehensive framework for the crypto market through legislation.


Final Summary

  • The SEC has clarified that most crypto assets are not securities, introducing a formal taxonomy and addressing long-standing regulatory uncertainty.
  • The joint guidance with the CFTC signals a more coordinated and flexible approach to crypto oversight in the United States.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main clarification provided by the SEC regarding crypto assets in the new framework?

AThe SEC clarified that most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

QOn what date was this significant regulatory guidance announced?

AThe guidance was announced on 17 March 2026.

QWhat are the five broad categories in the SEC's new classification system for digital assets?

AThe five categories are: Digital commodities, Digital collectibles, Digital tools, Stablecoins, and Digital securities.

QAccording to the guidance, can a crypto asset's legal status change over time?

AYes, the guidance states that an asset's legal status may change depending on how it is offered, marketed, and used, and that an investment contract arrangement can cease over time.

QWhich other U.S. regulatory agency did the SEC coordinate with to issue this joint interpretation?

AThe SEC issued the guidance in coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ruHace 3 hora(s)

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ruHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片