SEC Drops Civil Lawsuit Against Gemini Trust Company

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-24Actualizado a 2026-01-24

Resumen

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has dismissed its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be reopened. This decision follows the full repayment of crypto assets to all affected Gemini Earn users through the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024. The SEC cited the complete return of investors' crypto and the resolution of harm as key reasons for dropping the lawsuit. The case originated from a 2020 partnership between Gemini and Genesis, which froze $900 million in user assets during the 2023 market downturn. Gemini contributed significant funds and penalties to help resolve the situation and settle with regulators.

The Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States has officially dismissed its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company. This move indicates a major comfort for the crypto exchange founders Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss.

The decision is followed by Gemini Earn users getting all their crypto back, bringing an end to a long legal case that initiated in 2023. As per the filing of 23rd January 2026, the SEC and Gemini Trust Company came together to drop the case with prejudice, which means it can’t be opened in the future.

The Securities and Exchange Commission mentioned that the decision was made using its own judgement, with investor repayment playing a significant role. All Gemini Earn users who were affected got a complete return of their crypto assets. The repayment wasn’t done in cash, and it was completed via the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024.

The SEC further mentioned that after returning users’ crypto completely, the harm to investors was prominently reduced. The regulator also highlighted that Gemini has so far settled associated issues with a lot of state regulators.

The Complete Closure

Amalgamated, these steps backed the decision to completely drop the lawsuit. The case traces back to December 2020, when Gemini collaborated with Genesis, a crypto lending firm associated with Digital Currency Group.

As per this arrangement, Gemini users could lend their crypto to Genesis and get interest payments. Problems initiated when Genesis broke at the time of the wider crypto market downturn.

Withdrawals got frozen, and $900 million in crypto assets were left, associated with around 340,000 users locked and inaccessible. For resolving the situation, Gemini contributed around $40 million in Bitcoin and $10 million in other assets.

It further contributed a $37 million penalty for a different settlement with New York regulators. Gradually, Gemini worked through various legal and regulatory processes at state as well as federal levels, having the complete repayment of users appearing as the prominent milestone in terminating the case.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

ARK Invest Enters Broader Crypto ETFs With CoinDesk 20

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the SEC dismiss its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company?

AThe SEC dismissed the lawsuit based on its own judgment, citing the complete repayment of crypto assets to Gemini Earn users as a significant factor that reduced investor harm.

QWhat does the dismissal 'with prejudice' mean for the case against Gemini?

AA dismissal 'with prejudice' means the case is permanently closed and cannot be reopened or refiled in the future.

QHow and when were the affected Gemini Earn users repaid their crypto assets?

AThe repayment was completed in-kind (not in cash) through the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024.

QWhat was the initial problem that led to the SEC's lawsuit against Gemini?

AThe lawsuit stemmed from a program where Gemini users lent crypto to Genesis, which then froze withdrawals during a market downturn, locking up $900 million in assets belonging to 340,000 users.

QWhat other significant financial contributions did Gemini make to resolve this situation?

ABeyond facilitating user repayments, Gemini contributed $40 million in Bitcoin, $10 million in other assets, and paid a $37 million penalty in a separate settlement with New York regulators.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros