‘Scammers are liable’: Uniswap CEO reacts to landmark court dismissal

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-03Actualizado a 2026-03-03

Resumen

In a landmark ruling, a New York federal court dismissed a lawsuit against Uniswap that sought to hold the decentralized exchange and its CEO, Hayden Adams, liable for financial losses users suffered from scam tokens traded on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the misconduct of unidentified third-party token issuers, stating it defies logic to hold the drafter of open-source code accountable for a third party’s misuse of the platform. The case, ongoing since April 2022, was dismissed with prejudice. Uniswap’s CEO hailed the decision as a "good, sensible outcome" and a significant legal precedent for DeFi, emphasizing that scammers—not open-source developers—should be held liable for fraud. The ruling is seen as a major win for the DeFi industry, providing decentralized platforms greater legal protection and breathing room. Following the news, Uniswap’s native token UNI saw a brief price increase of approximately 5%. The case may influence ongoing legislative efforts, such as the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish safe harbor protections for open-source developers in crypto.

DeFi exchange Uniswap has hailed the latest court ruling that dismissed a case that sought to hold it accountable for scam tokens traded on the platform.

In an opinion issued on the 2nd of March, federal Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Judge Failla ruled that the petitioners can not hold Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams and Uniswap Labs (defendants) responsible for misconduct carried out by unidentified third-party token issuers.

The petitioners claimed losses from trading tokens on the Uniswap platform. They alleged the tokens were ‘rug pulls’ and ‘pump and dump’ schemes.

According to them, Uniswap facilitated fraud by running a marketplace that allows the selling and buying of these alleged scam tokens.

But the court dismissed this argument, stating that,

“It defies logic that a drafter of computer code underlying a particular software platform could be liable under Section 29(b) for a third-party’s misuse of that platform.”

Uniswap leadership hails the ruling

The case has been running since April 2022. Reacting to the ruling, Uniswap CEO called it a ‘good, sensible outcome’ and a new legal precedent for the sector.

“If you write open source smart contract code, and the code is used by scammers, the scammers are liable, not the open source developers.”

Stani Kulechov, Founder of Aave, called the update a “great win for DeFi.”

The change gives DeFi players breathing room. Fully decentralized platforms will no longer face legal liability for losses caused by third-party token issuers.

Lawmakers are also pushing for a safe harbor for open-source developers in the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. Still, the final draft will determine whether those developer protections actually hold.

Uniswap is one of the largest DeFi platforms and has operated for over eight years. Since its inception, the exchange has recorded a cumulative of over $5 billion in fees and recently activated a token accrual program for its governance token UNI.

Following the court update, the Uniswap [UNI] token surged by about 5%, but was still stuck between $3.6 and $4.2 short-term price range.

Final Summary

Judge Failla ruled that Uniswap and other DeFi platforms can’t be held responsible for misconduct done by unidentified third-party token issuers.
The case could set the tone for the protection of open-source DeFi developers, according to policy watchers.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the outcome of the court case against Uniswap regarding scam tokens?

AThe court dismissed the case with prejudice, ruling that Uniswap and its CEO could not be held liable for the misconduct of unidentified third-party token issuers.

QWho was the judge that issued the ruling in the Uniswap case?

AFederal Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) issued the opinion.

QWhat was the core legal argument the judge used to dismiss the complaint?

AThe judge stated that it defies logic to hold the drafter of computer code liable for a third party's misuse of that platform under Section 29(b).

QHow did Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams react to the court's decision?

AHe called it a 'good, sensible outcome' and a new legal precedent, stating that scammers are liable, not the open-source developers.

QWhat was the immediate market reaction of the UNI token following the court update?

AThe UNI token surged by about 5% following the court ruling.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

Intel CEO Chen Liwu outlines a bold vision for the company's transformation in a podcast interview, targeting a "10x return in 5-10 years." He emphasizes a strategic shift beyond traditional process node scaling, focusing on advanced packaging (like EMIB), new materials (glass substrates, GaN, SiC, InP, synthetic diamond), and system-level integration. Key to this is Intel's foundry business, where he prioritizes building trust through superior yield, defect density, and cycle times. Chen sees strong CPU demand resurgence driven by agent AI and inference workloads. He details the Terafab collaboration with Elon Musk to address semiconductor infrastructure gaps and stresses the strategic importance of U.S.-based advanced manufacturing. Acknowledging Intel is still in the "crawl" phase of his crawl-walk-run framework, Chen believes the company's full potential—extending from its PC base into edge computing and physical AI—will become apparent by 2030-2032.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar T

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Threshold Network Token (T) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Threshold Network Token (T) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Threshold Network Token (T)Después de comprar tu Threshold Network Token (T), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Threshold Network Token (T)Tradear fácilmente con Threshold Network Token (T) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

621 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de T (T).