Saylor Unveils Global Push To Make Bitcoin Quantum-Ready

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-02-06Actualizado a 2026-02-06

Resumen

Michael Saylor, during MicroStrategy's Q4 2025 earnings call, announced a global initiative to prepare Bitcoin for the future threat of quantum computing. While acknowledging the seriousness of the quantum risk, which he estimates is at least a decade away, Saylor warned against panic and rushed protocol changes that could introduce new vulnerabilities. Instead of advocating for a specific technical solution or timeline, MicroStrategy will launch a "Bitcoin security program" to coordinate with global cybersecurity and crypto communities. The goal is to build consensus and develop solutions responsibly when the time is right. The company also reported holding 713,502 BTC after purchasing an additional 32,470 BTC in Q4 and establishing a $2.25 billion cash reserve.

Strategy used its Q4 2025 earnings call to spotlight what Michael Saylor framed as the next long-horizon security agenda for Bitcoin: coordinating a global “Bitcoin security program” aimed at quantum readiness, while warning against rushed protocol changes that could create more risk than they remove.

The remarks came as Strategy reported a quarter shaped by Bitcoin’s drawdown under fair-value accounting, even as it continued to add to its treasury. CFO Andrew Kang said the company ended 2025 with 713,502 Bitcoin—about 3.4% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist—after buying an additional 32,470 BTC in Q4 for roughly $3.1 billion.

Kang added that Strategy raised more than $25 billion of total capital during 2025 and established a $2.25 billion cash reserve designed to cover roughly 2.5 years of interest and dividend obligations.

Strategy Will Initiate A Bitcoin Security Program

Saylor addressed quantum computing directly at the end of the call, calling it the latest in a long sequence of recurring existential narratives around Bitcoin. His message was twofold: treat the risk seriously, but resist a “stampede” into premature changes.

“The concern today is quantum computers and many people ask if quantum computers represent a threat to Bitcoin,” Saylor said, before arguing the debate fits a familiar pattern. “What I would say is whenever dealing with each of these concerns we have to take them seriously... but we have to remember two things. One... ‘Don’t panic.’... The second observation, the hypocratic oath, does no harm... You don’t want an iatrogenic intervention where the cure is worse than the disease.”

In his view, the timing matters as much as the engineering. “Our position on quantum computing... we think it’s probably 10 or more years away before there’s a threat. That is the consensus,” he said. Saylor added that quantum-resistant work is happening broadly across industries that rely on conventional cryptography, and that Bitcoin-specific R&D is already underway, but emphasized that there is not yet “global consensus that existing cryptographic libraries are at risk.”

That lack of consensus, he argued, is precisely why Strategy won’t advocate a specific quantum roadmap today. “To stampede into a hypothetical fix before there is consensus would introduce new attack surfaces and new complexity and new failure modes that don’t currently exist,” Saylor said.

Pressed by Fundstrat’s Tom Lee on how Bitcoin might handle quantum-vulnerable wallet types, Saylor reiterated that Strategy would not try to steer the technical outcome. “I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to advocate a particular solution or a particular approach nor a particular time frame,” he said. “Our role is to support all of the various communities and facilitate the evolution of consensus about what should be done, how it should be done, when it should be done.”

The most concrete announcement was a commitment to formalize that support into an organized effort. “Strategy is going to initiate a Bitcoin security program that coordinates with the global cyber security community, the global crypto security community and the global Bitcoin security committee... to contribute to consensus and solutions to address the quantum computing threat as well as any other emergent security threats that evolve,” Saylor said.

He framed the initiative as a responsibility commensurate with Strategy’s scale as a holder, but also as a coordination problem: the goal is to engage “very brilliant minds,” align with the work already being done, and help solutions emerge “at the right time in a responsible fashion.”

At press time, BTC traded at $65,183.

BTC needs a weekly closer above the 200-week EMA ideally, 1-week chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of Michael Saylor's new Bitcoin security initiative announced during the Q4 2025 earnings call?

AThe main focus is coordinating a global 'Bitcoin security program' aimed at achieving quantum readiness and addressing emergent security threats, while cautioning against rushed protocol changes.

QHow many Bitcoin did MicroStrategy hold by the end of 2025, and what percentage of the total supply does this represent?

AMicroStrategy held 713,502 Bitcoin by the end of 2025, representing about 3.4% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist.

QWhat is Michael Saylor's estimated timeline for when quantum computing might pose a threat to Bitcoin?

AMichael Saylor estimates that a quantum computing threat to Bitcoin is probably 10 or more years away, which he states is the consensus view.

QAccording to Saylor, why is MicroStrategy not advocating for a specific quantum-resistant solution for Bitcoin at this time?

AMicroStrategy is not advocating for a specific solution because there is not yet a global consensus that existing cryptographic libraries are at risk, and rushing a fix could introduce new attack surfaces and complexity.

QWhat specific financial preparation did MicroStrategy's CFO mention regarding the company's obligations?

ACFO Andrew Kang stated that MicroStrategy established a $2.25 billion cash reserve designed to cover roughly 2.5 years of interest and dividend obligations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar PUSH

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Push Protocol (PUSH)Después de comprar tu Push Protocol (PUSH), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Push Protocol (PUSH)Tradear fácilmente con Push Protocol (PUSH) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

246 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar PUSH

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de PUSH (PUSH).

活动图片