Saylor Unveils Global Push To Make Bitcoin Quantum-Ready

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-02-06Actualizado a 2026-02-06

Resumen

Michael Saylor, during MicroStrategy's Q4 2025 earnings call, announced a global initiative to prepare Bitcoin for the future threat of quantum computing. While acknowledging the seriousness of the quantum risk, which he estimates is at least a decade away, Saylor warned against panic and rushed protocol changes that could introduce new vulnerabilities. Instead of advocating for a specific technical solution or timeline, MicroStrategy will launch a "Bitcoin security program" to coordinate with global cybersecurity and crypto communities. The goal is to build consensus and develop solutions responsibly when the time is right. The company also reported holding 713,502 BTC after purchasing an additional 32,470 BTC in Q4 and establishing a $2.25 billion cash reserve.

Strategy used its Q4 2025 earnings call to spotlight what Michael Saylor framed as the next long-horizon security agenda for Bitcoin: coordinating a global “Bitcoin security program” aimed at quantum readiness, while warning against rushed protocol changes that could create more risk than they remove.

The remarks came as Strategy reported a quarter shaped by Bitcoin’s drawdown under fair-value accounting, even as it continued to add to its treasury. CFO Andrew Kang said the company ended 2025 with 713,502 Bitcoin—about 3.4% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist—after buying an additional 32,470 BTC in Q4 for roughly $3.1 billion.

Kang added that Strategy raised more than $25 billion of total capital during 2025 and established a $2.25 billion cash reserve designed to cover roughly 2.5 years of interest and dividend obligations.

Strategy Will Initiate A Bitcoin Security Program

Saylor addressed quantum computing directly at the end of the call, calling it the latest in a long sequence of recurring existential narratives around Bitcoin. His message was twofold: treat the risk seriously, but resist a “stampede” into premature changes.

“The concern today is quantum computers and many people ask if quantum computers represent a threat to Bitcoin,” Saylor said, before arguing the debate fits a familiar pattern. “What I would say is whenever dealing with each of these concerns we have to take them seriously... but we have to remember two things. One... ‘Don’t panic.’... The second observation, the hypocratic oath, does no harm... You don’t want an iatrogenic intervention where the cure is worse than the disease.”

In his view, the timing matters as much as the engineering. “Our position on quantum computing... we think it’s probably 10 or more years away before there’s a threat. That is the consensus,” he said. Saylor added that quantum-resistant work is happening broadly across industries that rely on conventional cryptography, and that Bitcoin-specific R&D is already underway, but emphasized that there is not yet “global consensus that existing cryptographic libraries are at risk.”

That lack of consensus, he argued, is precisely why Strategy won’t advocate a specific quantum roadmap today. “To stampede into a hypothetical fix before there is consensus would introduce new attack surfaces and new complexity and new failure modes that don’t currently exist,” Saylor said.

Pressed by Fundstrat’s Tom Lee on how Bitcoin might handle quantum-vulnerable wallet types, Saylor reiterated that Strategy would not try to steer the technical outcome. “I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to advocate a particular solution or a particular approach nor a particular time frame,” he said. “Our role is to support all of the various communities and facilitate the evolution of consensus about what should be done, how it should be done, when it should be done.”

The most concrete announcement was a commitment to formalize that support into an organized effort. “Strategy is going to initiate a Bitcoin security program that coordinates with the global cyber security community, the global crypto security community and the global Bitcoin security committee... to contribute to consensus and solutions to address the quantum computing threat as well as any other emergent security threats that evolve,” Saylor said.

He framed the initiative as a responsibility commensurate with Strategy’s scale as a holder, but also as a coordination problem: the goal is to engage “very brilliant minds,” align with the work already being done, and help solutions emerge “at the right time in a responsible fashion.”

At press time, BTC traded at $65,183.

BTC needs a weekly closer above the 200-week EMA ideally, 1-week chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of Michael Saylor's new Bitcoin security initiative announced during the Q4 2025 earnings call?

AThe main focus is coordinating a global 'Bitcoin security program' aimed at achieving quantum readiness and addressing emergent security threats, while cautioning against rushed protocol changes.

QHow many Bitcoin did MicroStrategy hold by the end of 2025, and what percentage of the total supply does this represent?

AMicroStrategy held 713,502 Bitcoin by the end of 2025, representing about 3.4% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist.

QWhat is Michael Saylor's estimated timeline for when quantum computing might pose a threat to Bitcoin?

AMichael Saylor estimates that a quantum computing threat to Bitcoin is probably 10 or more years away, which he states is the consensus view.

QAccording to Saylor, why is MicroStrategy not advocating for a specific quantum-resistant solution for Bitcoin at this time?

AMicroStrategy is not advocating for a specific solution because there is not yet a global consensus that existing cryptographic libraries are at risk, and rushing a fix could introduce new attack surfaces and complexity.

QWhat specific financial preparation did MicroStrategy's CFO mention regarding the company's obligations?

ACFO Andrew Kang stated that MicroStrategy established a $2.25 billion cash reserve designed to cover roughly 2.5 years of interest and dividend obligations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar PUSH

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Push Protocol (PUSH)Después de comprar tu Push Protocol (PUSH), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Push Protocol (PUSH)Tradear fácilmente con Push Protocol (PUSH) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

212 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar PUSH

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de PUSH (PUSH).

活动图片