Samsung Securities Bets on Upbit: South Korean Financial Capital Fully Embraces Crypto

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-29Actualizado a 2026-05-29

Resumen

On May 28th, Samsung Securities announced its investment of approximately 306.3 billion KRW (about $203 million) to acquire a 2% stake in Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange. This move signifies a strategic shift as South Korea's traditional financial capital begins to formally embrace the crypto industry, potentially heralding a deeper integration between the two sectors. South Korea has long been a vibrant crypto market, with Upbit dominating local trading volumes. However, a regulatory policy known as "separation of finance and virtual assets" had previously limited traditional financial institutions' direct involvement. Recent signals from regulators about potentially relaxing these rules have opened the door for deeper engagement. Samsung Securities' investment is seen as a strategic move to secure a foothold in the next generation of digital finance ahead of this expected liberalization. The investment reflects a broader anxiety among traditional Korean financial institutions about evolving financial landscapes. As financial activities increasingly migrate on-chain and younger users gravitate towards crypto and digital assets, platforms like Upbit are evolving from simple trading venues into core nodes for future financial networks—encompassing roles like new-age brokerages, asset issuance platforms, and payment gateways. By investing in Dunamu, Samsung Securities is not only gaining exposure to a profitable entity but also sec...

Author: Winnie, CryptoPulse Labs

On May 28th, Samsung Securities announced that it will spend approximately 306.37 billion won (about $203 million) to acquire about 2% of the shares in Dunamu, the operator of South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.

This is not just an ordinary equity investment; it may signify a deeper shift in the South Korean financial system. This is because South Korean regulators have recently begun signaling a possible future relaxation of the 'separation of finance and virtual assets' policy—a long-standing restriction between financial institutions and the virtual asset industry.

And Samsung Securities' investment is, in essence, South Korean traditional financial capital preemptively seizing the next-generation digital financial gateway.

I. South Korean Financial Capital Formally Enters the Crypto Industry

For a long time, South Korea has been one of the world's most active crypto markets.

South Korean youth have an extremely high level of participation in Crypto. Whether it's Bitcoin, altcoins, Memes, AI Agents, or on-chain trends, the South Korean market is often one of the most active trading regions globally. And Upbit is almost the core of the South Korean crypto market.

As South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit has long occupied the vast majority of the trading share in the South Korean market. Its operator, Dunamu, is also one of the most profitable fintech companies in the country.

During the last bull market, Dunamu's profits even surpassed those of some traditional financial institutions in South Korea for a period.

But over the past few years, one issue has persisted. Although South Korean traditional financial institutions were aware of the immense traffic and profits in the crypto industry, they were unable to truly participate deeply.

This was due to South Korea's long-standing implementation of the so-called 'separation of finance and virtual assets' policy. In simple terms, there had to be a certain separation between financial institutions and the virtual asset industry; traditional financial institutions like banks and securities firms could not directly and deeply enter the Crypto industry chain.

The logic behind this regulation essentially reflects South Korea's long-standing dependency on and wariness towards the crypto industry. On one hand, South Korean retail investor trading enthusiasm is extremely high; on the other, regulators worry about financial risks, money laundering risks, and market bubbles.

Thus, over the past few years, a very peculiar situation emerged in South Korea. The Crypto market was extremely prosperous, yet traditional financial capital was largely absent. Now, this situation is changing.

Recently, South Korea's financial regulatory authorities have begun hinting that the separation of finance and virtual assets policy may be gradually relaxed in the future. This means that traditional financial institutions might in the future be able to invest in, cooperate with, or even operate digital asset businesses more freely. Samsung Securities' investment in Dunamu at this moment is essentially a preemptive move to secure a position.

Because all traditional financial institutions know that once regulations are truly loosened, the South Korean financial industry will inevitably erupt into a new round of competition for the crypto gateway.

II. Why is Samsung Securities Betting on Upbit Now?

Samsung Securities' investment in Dunamu appears on the surface to be just a financial investment. But in reality, it reflects the anxiety of South Korean traditional financial institutions about future changes in the financial system.

Over the past decade or more, the biggest change in the global financial industry has not been internet finance, but financial digitization. For example, the digitization of payments, the electronification of securities, the ETF-ification, and stablecoins. More and more financial activities are gradually migrating on-chain.

And crypto exchanges have also evolved from mere crypto trading platforms to become the next generation of financial infrastructure. Whether it's Coinbase, Robinhood, Hyperliquid, or Upbit, they are no longer just trading platforms.

They are more like new types of brokerages, new asset issuance platforms, new payment gateways, and even core nodes of future on-chain financial networks. What South Korean traditional securities firms fear most is that young users are gradually moving away from traditional securities markets.

Nowadays, more and more young users are no longer enthusiastic about traditional stocks. Instead, they are more interested in Crypto, stablecoins, and on-chain assets—these new financial trends are drawing away a massive amount of young user traffic.

For Samsung Securities, if it continues to remain within the traditional business logic, it may gradually lose its voice among young users and in the new financial markets in the future. Therefore, investing in Dunamu is essentially buying a ticket to the future digital financial era.

More importantly, what Upbit possesses is not just a trading business. It also has South Korea's largest crypto user base, the most mature Korean Won on/off-ramp system, the strongest virtual asset liquidity, and the most comprehensive Web3 ecosystem gateway in Korea.

In the future, whether it's RWA, stablecoins, on-chain securities, or digital ETFs, Upbit could potentially become one of South Korea's core financial gateways.

Samsung Securities' early investment now is equivalent to locking in future Korean digital financial infrastructure. And it's worth noting that the main sellers of the shares this time are Kakao-affiliated capital, not Dunamu's founding team.

This means Dunamu is not raising funds because it needs money, but rather it's more of a capital adjustment at the shareholder level. In other words, Samsung Securities is proactively securing a ticket at a high valuation stage.

This, in turn, indicates that traditional financial institutions have begun to genuinely and long-term believe in Crypto. Because only those who truly believe in the future are willing to position themselves early while the industry is still controversial.

III. South Korea is Entering the Era of Comprehensive On-Chain Finance

If we zoom out our perspective, we can see that what is happening in South Korea now is actually very similar to the trend in the United States over the past two years.

The biggest change in the US in recent years is not the rise in Bitcoin's price.

It's that Wall Street has begun to fully accept Crypto. BlackRock pushing for Bitcoin ETFs, Fidelity's foray into digital asset custody, Morgan Stanley opening up to crypto asset allocation, and more and more US banks researching stablecoins and on-chain settlement. In essence, the US has begun to incorporate Crypto into the traditional financial system.

South Korea is now heading down the same path. Samsung Securities' investment in Dunamu is essentially the South Korean version of the 'traditional securities firm plus Coinbase' model.

In the coming years, several important trends are likely to emerge in the South Korean market.

First, traditional financial institutions will comprehensively enter the virtual asset industry. This includes crypto ETFs, digital asset custody, on-chain securities, etc.

Because all financial institutions understand that the next round of financial infrastructure upgrade will likely happen on-chain.

Second, crypto exchanges will become further financialized. In the past, many exchanges were essentially just matching trades. But in the future, they may gradually transform into comprehensive financial platforms.

Not only can they trade Crypto, but in the future, they might even trade on-chain stocks, digital bonds, and stablecoin yield products.

Third, South Korea may become Asia's new on-chain financial hub. In the past, Asia's digital finance competition was mainly concentrated in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Dubai. But South Korea has an extremely strong retail investor base, internet culture, and a highly active trading ecosystem.

Once regulations are truly relaxed, South Korea could quickly become one of Asia's most important on-chain financial markets. Especially in terms of young user participation, the South Korean market might even be more aggressive than Japan's.

And Dunamu's valuation of approximately 15.3 trillion won also sends a very crucial signal. The capital market has already begun to redefine crypto exchanges.

In the past, many considered exchanges to be highly volatile, high-risk cyclical businesses. But now, more and more capital is starting to see them as the next generation of financial infrastructure.

What is truly valuable is no longer just a particular Token. It's the users, liquidity, asset issuance capabilities, and the gateway status in the future digital financial world.

From this perspective, what Samsung Securities bought is not just 2% of Dunamu's shares. It's more like purchasing a seat at the table in South Korea's next-generation financial order.

Conclusion

Over the past few years, there has been a debate within the crypto industry. Will Crypto replace traditional finance, or will it eventually be absorbed by traditional finance?

Now the answer seems increasingly clear. The future financial world is likely not traditional finance VS Crypto, but traditional finance going fully on-chain.

Samsung Securities' investment in Upbit is the most typical epitome of this trend. South Korean financial capital has formally begun to enter the deep waters of Crypto.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the recent major investment announced by Samsung Securities, and what company is involved?

ASamsung Securities announced a major investment of approximately 306.37 billion Korean won (about $203 million) to acquire about a 2% stake in Dunamu, the operator of South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.

QWhat does the article suggest is the main significance of Samsung Securities' investment in Dunamu?

AThe article suggests the investment signifies a deep structural shift within South Korea's financial system. It represents traditional financial capital preemptively securing a foothold in the next generation of digital finance, anticipating the potential loosening of the 'separation of finance and crypto' policy.

QWhat is the 'separation of finance and crypto' policy mentioned in the article, and how is it changing?

AThe 'separation of finance and crypto' policy, or 'geum-ga bunri', is a long-standing regulation in South Korea that restricts traditional financial institutions (like banks and securities firms) from deeply engaging with the virtual asset industry. The article states that South Korean regulators have recently begun hinting at a potential relaxation of this policy in the future.

QAccording to the article, what is a key concern driving traditional financial institutions like Samsung Securities to invest in crypto-related businesses?

AA key concern is the fear of losing relevance with younger users and future market influence. Young users are increasingly drawn to crypto, stablecoins, and on-chain assets rather than traditional stock markets. Institutions worry about missing out on the next wave of financial infrastructure upgrades happening on-chain.

QWhat broader trend in global finance does the article compare South Korea's current situation to?

AThe article compares it to the trend in the United States over the past two years, where Wall Street has begun fully embracing crypto—through actions like BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF, Fidelity's digital asset custody, and major banks exploring stablecoins. It suggests South Korea is on a similar path of integrating crypto into the traditional financial system.

Lecturas Relacionadas

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHace 1 hora(s)

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片