Sales Director Consulted with DeepSeek, Lost Job and 5 Million Rubles

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-27Actualizado a 2026-07-27

Resumen

Babuskinsky District Court of Moscow upheld the lawful dismissal of Ekaterina Remizova, sales director at GK Energoprof, for disclosing trade secrets. The employee was found to have forwarded company documents, including tender participation details and colleagues' salary data, to her personal email. Furthermore, she uploaded confidential reports with sales statistics, financial metrics, and cash flow data from the company's internal PowerBI resources into the external AI service DeepSeek. The court ruled that uploading such protected information into the DeepSeek AI system itself constitutes disclosure. An additional ground for dismissal was her disclosure of strategic company plans to a supplier, after which the counterparty ceased communication. The employer also cited systematic failure to meet sales targets. Following her dismissal, Remizova sued, demanding the termination be declared illegal, changed to "by mutual agreement," and seeking a contractual "golden parachute" of 5 million rubles. The court rejected the 5 million ruble claim, as such payment was only stipulated for mutual agreement or redundancy. While one disciplinary penalty was deemed unjustified, ordering the company to pay 10,000 rubles in moral compensation, the court largely sided with the employer, refusing to recognize the dismissal as unlawful. The case highlights risks associated with using external AI services. A security expert noted that DeepSeek's "Share" function creates links that can be in...

Babushkinsky District Court of Moscow has recognized the dismissal of Ekaterina Remizova, the sales director of the company "GK Energoprof," for disclosing trade secrets as lawful. The employee was forwarding official documents to her personal email and uploading them to the DeepSeek neural network. This is reported by RAPSI and RIA Novosti.

Remizova worked at the company from April 18, 2025, with a salary of over 800,000 rubles per month. In September 2025, she was already subject to disciplinary action, which was followed by dismissal for disclosing a secret protected by law.

What the Employee Was Charged With

The employer established that Remizova was sending documents regarding participation in a tender and a file with colleagues' salary data to her personal email address. She also used her personal address as a hidden copy (BCC) when forwarding corporate correspondence. In addition, she was extracting protected information from the company's internal resource—including PowerBI reports with statistics on deals, incoming funds, and financial indicators of departments—to the third-party service DeepSeek, developed by the Chinese company of the same name.

The court emphasized that the mere act of uploading trade secrets or confidential information into the Deepseek AI system already constitutes disclosure of such information.

An additional reason for dismissal was the disclosure of the company's strategic plans to the supplier "Sibtorgservis": Remizova informed them of the intention to launch the "Energogranum" brand on the market and establish direct supplies of generators from China, after which the counterparty ceased communication. The employer also cited systematic failure to meet sales targets.

The Demand for a "Golden Parachute" and the Outcome of the Proceedings

After her dismissal, Remizova filed a lawsuit demanding that the order be declared unlawful, the grounds for dismissal be changed to "by mutual agreement," and the "golden parachute" provided for in an additional agreement, amounting to 5 million rubles, be recovered. The company did not admit the claim. During the proceedings, the defendant offered a settlement agreement with a payment of over 400,000 rubles—half of the salary—but the plaintiff refused it.

The court stated that Remizova had no production necessity to extract information from the employer's protected media, send it to an uncontrolled external address, or post it on the third-party resource DeepSeek. These actions were classified as a gross violation of labor duties.

Outcomes of the case:

  • The demand for payment of the 5 million ruble "golden parachute" was rejected, as this payment is provided only upon termination of the contract by mutual agreement or staff reduction;
  • One of the disciplinary penalties was deemed unfounded; the company was ordered to pay 10,000 rubles in moral damages compensation;
  • The remainder of the claim, including the request to declare the dismissal unlawful, was denied.

The court's decision on case No. 02-1545/2026 has not yet entered into legal force and can be appealed.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, the Remizova case reflects only a part of a broader problem: the DeepSeek service allows data leakage not only through closed file uploads but also through its own Share function. Information security specialist David Konitzny discovered that the Google search engine freely indexes dialogues from the directory chat.deepseek.com/share/, and they can be found with a simple query: site:chat.deepseek.com/share/. The system's warning that the link can be opened by "anyone who has it" says nothing about possible indexing by search engines—and it is in this gap between the expectation of privacy and the technical design of the service that an additional risk lies for companies whose employees use such tools.

It turns out that even without malicious intent, a temporary link can turn into a permanent digital trail with fragments of code, work tasks, and financial data. How common is the practice of accidental disclosure of corporate information through such "temporary" links in other neural network services?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the main reasons for Ekaterina Remizova's dismissal according to the court?

AThe court found the dismissal lawful for disclosing trade secrets. The main reasons were: 1) Sending tender participation documents and colleagues' salary data to her personal email. 2) Using her personal email as a hidden copy (BCC) in corporate correspondence. 3) Uploading protected company information, including PowerBI reports on deals and financial data, to the external AI service DeepSeek.

QWhy was Ekaterina Remizova's claim for a 5 million ruble 'golden parachute' rejected by the court?

AThe court rejected the claim for the 5 million ruble 'golden parachute' because, according to her additional agreement, this payment was only provided for in cases of termination by mutual agreement or staff reduction. Her dismissal was classified as a gross violation of labor duties for disclosing trade secrets, which did not qualify for the 'golden parachute' payment.

QAccording to the article, what additional risk is highlighted regarding data security when using services like DeepSeek?

AThe article highlights that data leakage can occur not just through private file uploads but also via DeepSeek's 'Share' function. Security expert David Konitzny found that Google can freely index conversations from the 'chat.deepseek.com/share/' directory, making them discoverable via a simple site search. The system's warning that 'anyone with the link' can access it does not mention potential indexing by search engines, creating a gap between privacy expectations and the service's technical functionality. This risks exposing corporate information like code, tasks, or financial data through these 'temporary' links.

QWhat was the outcome of the court case regarding the disciplinary actions taken against Remizova?

AThe court's ruling was mixed: 1) It rejected Remizova's main claims to have her dismissal declared illegal and to receive the 5 million ruble 'golden parachute'. 2) It found one of the disciplinary actions against her to be unjustified and ordered the company to pay her 10,000 rubles in moral damages compensation. 3) In all other aspects of her lawsuit, including the legality of the dismissal, her claims were denied.

QWhat information did Remizova disclose to the supplier 'SibTorgService' that became an additional ground for her dismissal?

AShe disclosed the company's strategic plans to the supplier 'SibTorgService', specifically informing them about the intention to launch the 'Energygranum' brand on the market and to establish direct supplies of generators from China. Following this disclosure, the counterparty ceased communication. This act of revealing confidential strategic plans was cited as an additional ground for her dismissal.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片