Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-16Actualizado a 2026-08-16

Resumen

Roman Storm, founder of the cryptocurrency anonymization protocol Tornado Cash, convicted in August 2025 for conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, has accused Google and OpenAI of facilitating North Korea's nuclear program. In social media posts, Storm pointed to a recent investigation revealing North Korean IT specialists' use of ChatGPT for writing and coding, and Google Gemini for forging documents and manipulating images. He argued that, under the same legal logic the U.S. Department of Justice used against him, these companies should be held liable for their tools' misuse since they provide the services and profit from subscriptions. Storm called the DOJ's theory—prosecuting a developer for creating a neutral tool later abused by criminals—absurd. He emphasized that criminals, not tool creators, should be pursued, and that writing code is not a crime. The Tornado Cash verdict sets a negative U.S. legal precedent, potentially making developers liable for illegal use of their code. Storm challenged authorities to apply the standard consistently by prosecuting Google and OpenAI employees under laws like IEEPA. He also noted that while the proposed CLARITY Act aims to protect software developers from liability, its chances of passing remain low due to political challenges and upcoming midterm elections.

Roman Storm, the founder of the anonymity-focused cryptocurrency protocol Tornado Cash, has accused Google and OpenAI of assisting North Korea's nuclear program.

Storm, who was found guilty in August 2025 of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, pointed out the flawed logic in the case brought against him by the U.S. Department of Justice.

On social media, Storm noted that a recent investigation into North Korean IT professionals revealed their continued use of ChatGPT for writing text and programming, as well as Google Gemini for forging documents and altering images.

Storm suggested that, following the same logic the Department of Justice applied against him, these two companies should be held responsible for the actions of these malicious actors, as they provide these services and profit from their subscriptions.

"This is precisely the theory behind the 'United States v. Roman Storm' case: you create a neutral tool, malicious actors misuse it, and the developer faces prosecution instead of the criminals," he stated on social media.

"If this logic is absurd when applied to Google and OpenAI—it is also absurd when applied to Roman Storm.
You should prosecute the criminal, not the tool's creator. Writing code is not a crime," he emphasized.

The verdict in the Storm and Tornado Cash case has set a negative legal precedent in the United States, where software developers can be held liable for code used for illegal purposes. He believes large companies should face similar consequences for the use of their products.

"So let's be consistent: subpoena every Google and OpenAI employee. Scour their text messages for the slightest indication they knew their tools were being used by the DPRK. Charge them under IEEPA and sentence them to 20 years in prison," Storm concluded.

The Digital Asset Market Transparency Act, known as the CLARITY Act, introduces safeguards for software developers to shield them from potential illegal use of their protocols; however, even though a vote is scheduled on a motion to proceed to final consideration of the bill, its chances of passage remain low due to current challenges and the approaching midterm elections.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did Roman Storm, founder of Tornado Cash, accuse Google and OpenAI of in relation to North Korea?

AHe accused Google and OpenAI of assisting North Korea's nuclear program. He pointed out that an investigation revealed North Korean IT specialists were using ChatGPT for writing and coding, and Google Gemini for forging documents and altering images.

QAccording to Roman Storm, what is the flawed logic the U.S. Department of Justice applied in his case?

AHe stated the flawed logic is that if you create a neutral tool and malicious actors abuse it, the developer, rather than the criminals, faces prosecution. He argues this logic would absurdly hold tech companies like Google and OpenAI responsible for the misuse of their services by North Korean operatives.

QWhat precedent did the verdict against Storm and Tornado Cash set in the United States?

AThe verdict set a negative legal precedent where software developers can be held liable for code that is used for illegal purposes.

QWhat specific legislative proposal is mentioned that aims to protect software developers, and what is its current status?

AThe legislative proposal mentioned is the CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Transparency Act). It introduces safeguards for software developers against potential illegal use of their protocols. However, its chances of passing are still considered low due to current challenges and the approaching midterm elections, even though a vote to advance it is planned.

QWhat did Roman Storm sarcastically suggest as a consistent application of the DOJ's logic against him?

AHe sarcastically suggested that for consistency, every employee of Google and OpenAI should be subpoenaed, their text messages reviewed for any sign they knew their tools were used by North Korea, and charged under the IEEPA law with a 20-year prison sentence.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Trading

Spot
活动图片