Robinhood, the First Stock in the Predictive Market Concept

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-16Actualizado a 2026-06-16

Resumen

The online brokerage Robinhood, which previously partnered with prediction market platform Kalshi to offer event contract trading to its users, is now becoming a direct competitor. This shift began after Robinhood, through a joint venture, acquired and rebranded a CFTC-regulated exchange (now Rothera Exchange). Robinhood's motivation stems from the rapid growth of prediction markets on its platform, which significantly boosted its "other transaction revenue." Recognizing that its vast retail user base is the most critical asset, Robinhood aims to capture more value by routing orders to its own exchange instead of sharing fees with Kalshi. It strategically launched its Rothera platform during the high-traffic 2026 FIFA World Cup, successfully processing tens of millions of contracts in its initial days. This move signals a pivotal power shift in the prediction market industry: control over user distribution and access is emerging as a more decisive advantage than the underlying market infrastructure itself. The future competition may increasingly revolve around which platforms control the major user gateways.

Author: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily

The battle of the World Cup has begun, and the total trading volume of the predictive market continues to hit new highs. However, as the industry leader, Kalshi might not be in the best mood right now.

The reason is not due to fluctuations in Kalshi's own business data, but because Kalshi now "suddenly" faces another formidable rival besides Polymarket, and this opponent was once its most important ally.

  • Odaily Note: Data sourced from Defillama.

Kalshi's Most Important Traffic Channel — Robinhood

Rewind to March 2025. At that time, Kalshi announced a partnership with the US online broker Robinhood, where the latter would use Kalshi's services to offer its users predictive market trading, allowing them to place bets on events like politics, economics, and sports.

From a business model perspective, this was a typical case of "mutual benefit" — Robinhood, responsible for user access and transaction distribution, could directly use Kalshi's mature product; Kalshi, responsible for the underlying market, matching, clearing, and regulatory compliance systems, could reach Robinhood's massive retail user pool.

The subsequent story proved the "win-win" outcome of this partnership. Through Robinhood's channel distribution, Kalshi indirectly gained massive users and transaction volume. Piper Sandler analysts once estimated that "trading volume completed through Robinhood's channel accounted for about 25%-35% of Kalshi's total trading volume." These orders ultimately translated into revenue for both parties — Robinhood would independently charge for all Kalshi event contracts traded through its channel, a fixed fee of $0.01 per contract per direction, and then share the revenue with Kalshi (the specific proportion was not disclosed).

The Q1 financial report disclosed at the end of April showed that Robinhood facilitated the trading of 8.8 billion event contracts in Q1, driving "other trading revenue" to grow by 320% year-on-year, reaching $147 million. The predictive market has become the brightest new growth engine in Robinhood's product line.

However, recently, this relationship has undergone some subtle changes.

Robinhood's Ambition: Taking Back the Cake Shared with Kalshi

As internet history has proven countless times, when a channel gains enough leverage, it is no longer content with being just a channel. Robinhood is no exception.

Although the partnership with Kalshi also brought substantial revenue to Robinhood, as the predictive market became one of the fastest-growing new businesses on the platform, Robinhood was no longer satisfied with the current revenue-sharing arrangement.

In their cooperation model, Kalshi was responsible for providing the market and infrastructure, while Robinhood was responsible for providing users and order flow. However, as the partnership deepened, Robinhood gradually realized that what is truly scarce might not be the market itself, but the user access it firmly controls. After all, for most Robinhood users, they don't care whether their orders are ultimately executed on Kalshi or another platform — users only see a trading entry within the Robinhood app, not the underlying infrastructure provider.

In other words, Robinhood always held one of the most critical resources for the predictive market — distribution power. If the users belong to Robinhood, why should the order flow go to someone else?

In fact, just as Robinhood was quickly validating the demand for predictive markets through Kalshi, a Plan B was quietly launched shortly thereafter.

In November 2025, Robinhood announced the formation of a joint venture with Wall Street quantitative trading giant Susquehanna and planned to acquire the CFTC-regulated derivatives exchange MIAXdx. According to the official statement, this joint venture would operate an independent futures and derivatives exchange and clearing organization in the future, with predictive markets being one of its key focus areas. At the time, the outside world largely viewed it as an infrastructure investment. However, as more information was disclosed later, people gradually realized Robinhood's goal was far beyond just finding a new partner for predictive markets.

In January 2026, the transaction was completed. Robinhood and Susquehanna gained 90% control of MIAXdx, simultaneously acquiring a complete CFTC regulatory framework, including Designated Contract Market (DCM) and Derivatives Clearing Organization (DCO) licenses. Subsequently, MIAXdx was renamed Rothera Exchange, and its clearing organization was renamed Rothera Clearing.

At this point, Robinhood possessed the core elements needed to independently operate a predictive market, lacking only a mature product comparable to Kalshi. However, for Robinhood, with its rich experience in internet product development, this was evidently not a difficult task.

Rothera's Opportunity: The World Cup

In June 2026, after about half a year of accelerated development, the Rothera product gradually took shape, and Robinhood finally made the move that was almost destined to happen — gradually shifting the orders that originally flowed to Kalshi into its own controlled system.

Robinhood specifically chose an ideal launch battleground for Rothera — the World Cup. For predictive markets, the World Cup is undoubtedly one of the most high-traffic trading themes. Whether it's match outcomes, advancement results, or champion predictions, related markets can attract a large number of new users to trade in a short period. For the newly launched Rothera platform, there is no better scenario for a cold start than the World Cup.

According to Robinhood's official disclosure, during this World Cup with a total of 104 matches, some event contracts will be directed to Rothera for matching and clearing, including markets for single World Cup match results, the ultimate World Cup champion, total goals in a single match, and others. Compared to the previous model that relied entirely on Kalshi, this marks the first time Robinhood has introduced predictive market orders into its own trading system on a large scale.

Judging by the results, Rothera clearly seized this opportunity. According to data disclosed by Hood House, an investment research media tracking Robinhood's activities, on June 12, Rothera completed 44.2 million contract trades, corresponding to a dollar trading volume of approximately $24.4 million; on June 13, Rothera completed 69.7 million contract trades, corresponding to a dollar trading volume of approximately $20.9 million... Although these figures still lag behind Kalshi's popular markets, which often involve hundreds of millions of dollars, considering that Rothera has literally just launched a few days ago, this performance is sufficiently successful.

For both Robinhood and Kalshi, this signifies that the balance of their cooperation has begun to tilt. From Robinhood's perspective, the transaction fee revenue that previously had to be shared with Kalshi can now be kept more within its own ecosystem. From Kalshi's perspective, this means that one of its most important growth engines has begun to show signs of weakening.

And the World Cup is clearly just the beginning of Rothera's encroachment on Kalshi. Looking further into the future, Robinhood will inevitably expand Rothera's coverage to more sporting events, as well as economic and political themes. Those orders that originally flowed to Kalshi will be intercepted one by one by Rothera.

Since Robinhood and Kalshi have never publicly disclosed their revenue-sharing ratio (some reports say 50%:50%, but no official information is available), we cannot know the exact monetary value of this interception. However, considering that Robinhood alone generated $147 million in predictive market-related revenue in Q1, and the Q2 World Cup and the more distant mid-term elections will likely bring even larger-scale trading activities, calculated on an annual basis, the value of this interception could reach several billion dollars.

Who Controls Distribution, Controls Everything

The drama of Robinhood and Kalshi moving from allies to opponents once again illustrates a logic repeatedly proven in the internet market — products are easy to build, but traffic is hard to find; whoever controls distribution controls everything.

Over the past few years, the market generally believed that Kalshi's core moat came from regulatory licenses, exchange qualifications, and clearing capabilities. Therefore, whether it was brokers like Robinhood or various media, communities, and traffic platforms, they were essentially just Kalshi's channel partners and traffic inlets. However, the emergence of Rothera proves one thing: in today's landscape of severe product homogenization, the product itself might not be the most critical element. What is truly scarce is always the user.

Where the users are, the liquidity is; where the liquidity is, the market will be. When Robinhood controls the access to tens of millions of retail users, it has the full capability to direct these users to any trading venue. For users, they don't care whether their orders are ultimately executed on Kalshi or Rothera. As long as the experience doesn't significantly differ, it doesn't matter who is matching or clearing behind the scenes.

If the theme of the predictive market industry in the past few years was the market battle between Polymarket and Kalshi, then the theme for the coming years might become a channel war. Robinhood incubating Rothera is essentially a reverse integration initiated by the channel side towards the market layer. As more and more platforms with traffic inlets begin to realize the strategic value of predictive markets, similar stories are highly likely to continue occurring. Whether it's exchanges, brokers, social platforms, or media platforms, they could all become new predictive market entry points.

And when inlets start to control the market, and channels begin to have pricing power, the ultimate winner in the predictive market industry might no longer be the platform responsible for order matching, but the one closest to the user and most capable of controlling distribution.

This was true in the internet era and the mobile internet era. This time, there's no exception either.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why did Robinhood partner with Kalshi initially?

ARobinhood partnered with Kalshi in March 2025 to leverage Kalshi's established product and regulatory infrastructure to offer prediction market trading services to its users. This allowed Robinhood to enter the prediction market quickly while Kalshi gained access to Robinhood's large retail user base.

QWhat is the core reason Robinhood decided to develop its own prediction market platform, Rothera Exchange?

AThe core reason is that Robinhood realized it controlled the most critical resource: the user distribution channel. Since users only interacted through the Robinhood app and didn't care about the backend infrastructure, Robinhood saw an opportunity to capture more revenue by diverting orders from Kalshi to its own controlled platform, thereby keeping more of the transaction fees.

QWhat event did Robinhood choose to launch Rothera Exchange, and why was it strategic?

ARobinhood strategically chose the 2026 FIFA World Cup to launch Rothera Exchange. The World Cup is a major event that generates high trading volume and attracts many new users to prediction markets, making it an ideal scenario for the platform's initial growth and market penetration.

QHow significant was the volume of prediction market trades for Robinhood in Q1 of 2026 according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Robinhood's Q1 2026 earnings report showed it facilitated 8.8 billion event contracts, driving a 320% year-over-year growth in 'other transaction revenue' to $147 million. This made prediction markets the fastest-growing new business line for Robinhood at the time.

QWhat broader industry shift does the article suggest is occurring with the rise of Rothera and similar moves by other platforms?

AThe article suggests the industry is shifting from a market-centric competition (like between Polymarket and Kalshi) to a 'channel war' or 'distribution war.' Platforms with large user bases and distribution power (like Robinhood, brokerages, social media) are recognizing the value of prediction markets and may integrate or build their own, challenging the dominance of pure infrastructure providers.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar T

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Threshold Network Token (T) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Threshold Network Token (T) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Threshold Network Token (T)Después de comprar tu Threshold Network Token (T), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Threshold Network Token (T)Tradear fácilmente con Threshold Network Token (T) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

650 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar T

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de T (T).

活动图片