Ripple takes RLUSD multichain: Stablecoin expands to L2s with Wormhole

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-15Actualizado a 2025-12-15

Resumen

Ripple has expanded its U.S.-regulated stablecoin, RLUSD, to Layer 2 networks including Optimism, Base, Ink, and Unichain using Wormhole’s Native Token Transfers (NTT) standard. This enables native multichain issuance, reducing bridge risks and ensuring regulatory compliance. RLUSD is the first U.S. Trust-regulated stablecoin on these L2s. Backed by a NYDFS Trust Charter and with a pending OCC application, it aims to be the first dual-regulated stablecoin. The expansion enhances utility for both XRP and RLUSD, strengthening Ripple’s role in institutional DeFi and cross-chain liquidity.

Ripple has expanded its U.S.-regulated stablecoin, Ripple USD [RLUSD], to Layer 2 networks for the first time. This marks a major step toward a multichain strategy ahead of its full launch next year.

The testing rollout begins on Optimism, Base, Ink, and Unichain, and is powered by Wormhole’s Native Token Transfers [NTT] standard — a system designed to move assets across chains without relying on wrapped tokens or traditional bridge architectures.

The move positions RLUSD as the first U.S. Trust-regulated stablecoin to deploy natively on these L2 ecosystems.

RLUSD goes multichain with native issuance on L2s

Unlike bridged assets, Wormhole’s NTT framework enables RLUSD to maintain native issuance and control across every supported chain.

This approach reduces bridge risk, preserves liquidity integrity, and creates a regulatory-compliant pathway for institutional DeFi expansion.

According to the announcement, Optimism serves as the entry point, with Base, Ink, and Unichain interconnected through the same NTT infrastructure — allowing Ripple to scale RLUSD across multiple environments without fragmentation.

Ripple’s SVP of Stablecoin, Jack McDonald, said the expansion reflects rising institutional demand for a fully compliant stablecoin that can move across chains with predictable oversight.

“Stablecoins are the gateway to DeFi and institutional adoption,” he said. “By launching RLUSD on these L2 networks, we are setting the standard where compliance and on-chain efficiency converge.”

Why regulation matters more than ever

RLUSD launched under a New York Department of Financial Services [NYDFS] Trust Charter, one of the most stringent regulatory frameworks in crypto.

Last week, AMBCrypto also reported that Ripple has applied for an OCC charter. If approved, this would make RLUSD the first stablecoin simultaneously overseen at both the state and federal levels.

No existing major stablecoin, including USDC or USDT, operates under this dual structure.

Ripple now holds more than 75 licenses globally, with recent approvals in Dubai and Abu Dhabi further strengthening RLUSD’s international reach.

Utility boost for both Ripple XRP and RLUSD

The multichain expansion is designed to strengthen XRP’s role in cross-chain liquidity.

Hex Trust recently issued wrapped XRP [wXRP] to support interoperability, enabling XRP holders to pair wXRP with RLUSD on supported chains for swaps, payments, lending, or yield-generating applications.

Data from DefilLama shows that Ethereum currently has the highest share of RLUSD [79.2%] worth over $1 billion, while the remaining 20.8% is on XRPL.


Final Thoughts

  • RLUSD’s L2 expansion sets a new regulatory benchmark for multichain stablecoins and positions Ripple as a direct challenger to USDC’s dominance.
  • The move enhances utility for both XRP and RLUSD, creating a deeper role for Ripple in institutional DeFi and cross-chain liquidity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片