Ripple Plans BC Payments Acquisition to Expand in Australia

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-11Actualizado a 2026-03-11

On March 10, Ripple publicised that it has plans to acquire BC Payments to have an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) as it looks to expand its presence in the Asia Pacific region.

In the statement, Ripple added that having the AFSL via the acquisition will help the firm to provide Ripple Payments, an end-to-end payments platform that handles the “full lifecycle” of a transaction and amalgamates both traditional banking and crypto services.

The managing director at APAC Ripple mentions that Australia remains the prominent market for Ripple and an AFSL makes the ability of scaling Ripple Payments across the region possible.

The statement does not give any hint regarding the financial terms of the BC Payments acquisition. Ripple mentioned that currently it has more than 75 regulatory licences around the world, which positions the firm in a strong position to work with institutions looking to expand into digital asset solutions and infrastructure.

The Robust Position of Ripple in the Industry

In February, Ripple got a full EU electronic money institution licence in Luxembourg. At the end of 2025, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency gave Ripple a conditional approval to become a national trust bank charter.

Ripple’s creation and highly promoted token XRP is now the fifth-largest crypto asset in the world, having $85.1 billion in market capitalisation. At the time of writing, it was trading at $1.38, up 1.24% in the last 24 hours and 4.01% down in the past month, as per CoinMarketCap.

At the same time Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD, has about $1.6 billion in market cap, positioning it as the 10th-biggest stablecoin. Recently, it was also reported that the stablecoins generated around $33 trillion in 2025.

In January 2026, Ripple also secured a great collaboration with LMAX Group to widen the institutional usage of RLUSD.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Pump.fun Price Analysis: PUMP Holds Near $0.00207 as Platform Seeks Lawsuit Dismissal

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason Ripple plans to acquire BC Payments in Australia?

ARipple plans to acquire BC Payments to obtain an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), which will help the company expand its presence in the Asia Pacific region and scale its Ripple Payments platform.

QHow many regulatory licenses does Ripple currently hold worldwide according to the statement?

ARipple currently holds more than 75 regulatory licenses around the world.

QWhat significant license did Ripple obtain in Luxembourg in February?

AIn February, Ripple obtained a full EU electronic money institution license in Luxembourg.

QWhat is the market capitalization of Ripple's XRP token and its current ranking?

ARipple's XRP token has a market capitalization of $85.1 billion, making it the fifth-largest crypto asset in the world.

QWhich stablecoin does Ripple issue and what is its approximate market cap?

ARipple issues a dollar-pegged stablecoin called RLUSD, which has a market cap of about $1.6 billion, making it the 10th-largest stablecoin.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Hace 13 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Hace 13 min(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

Strategy CEO Phong Le emphasizes that the company's legacy software business is integral to its Bitcoin Treasury Company model, creating unique operational, financial, and cultural synergies. He argues that the software division, which recently reported its strongest quarter in a decade with 12% revenue growth and 27% margin expansion, funds Bitcoin-related expenses and provides a critical institutional foundation. This includes a 35-year operating history, public company infrastructure, and extensive compliance standards that most digital asset firms lack. Conversely, Le states the Bitcoin strategy has energized employees and engaged customers. Looking ahead, Strategy is leveraging its "Mosaic" AI data platform to automate internal systems and drive its software evolution, aiming for more autonomous and adaptive operations.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros