Ripple Exec Warns Compromise Is Coming – What This Means For XRP

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

Ripple's Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, indicated that a compromise may be near in ongoing discussions between banks, the U.S. Senate, and crypto leaders regarding stablecoin regulations. A recent White House meeting, though not final, was described as productive. Banks presented principles opposing yield-bearing stablecoins to protect traditional banking, but reportedly made a key compromise by allowing possible exemptions. This could permit transaction-based rewards under strict conditions, impacting Ripple’s operations and its stablecoin RLUSD. The outcome, expected by March 2026, may define permissible crypto activities and significantly influence XRP’s regulatory environment and market role.

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO), Stuart Alderoty, has signaled that a compromise may emerge soon from ongoing discussions among banks, the US Senate, and crypto leaders over stablecoin rewards. The comments followed a smaller White House meeting focused on stablecoin regulations, which highlighted which activities should be allowed under upcoming rules. Depending on the outcome, this could directly affect Ripple’s operations and the broader outlook for XRP.

Compromise Puts Ripple In Regulatory Focus

Popular Journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on Wednesday, February 11, that both banking and crypto participants had described the Stablecoin yield meeting in the White House as productive, even though no final agreement was reached. The meeting explored deal specifics in more detail than previous sessions, with particular attention on how stablecoin rewards, highlighted in the Clarity Act, could be structured under future rules.

During the meeting, Alderoty stated that “compromise is in the air,” signaling potential movement toward shared ground between banks and crypto representatives. For XRP, this matters because Ripple’s role in cross-border payments and the services of its stablecoin RLUSD depend heavily on how regulators define permissible reward-based and transaction-based activities.

Notably, Terrett stated that banks and trade groups arrived at the White House meeting with a written set of prohibition principles that outlined what they would not accept regarding stablecoin rewards. These principles were designed to protect traditional banking structures while limiting the extent to which digital assets could compete with deposit products.

Under the principles, banks stated that payment stablecoins should not offer yield or rewards to prevent deposit flight and preserve lending in local communities. They also called for strong enforcement measures to close loopholes, restrictions on marketing that could present stablecoins as insured or risk-free, and a regulatory review after two years to assess potential risks.

According to Terrett, one source said banks made a key concession by accepting language that included possible exemptions, something that had previously been off the table. This change opens the possibility that transaction-based rewards could be permitted under tightly defined conditions, a development that may influence how Ripple structures its stablecoin services, with potential effects on XRP as well.

What Negotiations Could Mean For XRP And Stablecoins

A major point of debate during the meeting was the definition of permissible activities, which would determine what crypto firms like Ripple are allowed to do when offering stablecoin rewards. Crypto representatives pushed for broader definitions to provide more clarity for stablecoins, while banks argued for narrower boundaries to reduce risks to the financial system.

The White House urged both parties to reach an agreement by March 1, 2026, with further discussions expected in the coming days. Although it’s unclear whether another meeting of the same scale will take place this month, Ripple’s participation puts RLUSD and XRP directly in the spotlight. The outcome of these negotiations could shape how the crypto company and the broader stablecoin market offer rewards and likely influence how they operate under future regulatory frameworks.

XRP trading at $1.37 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did Ripple's Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, signal about the ongoing stablecoin discussions?

AStuart Alderoty signaled that 'compromise is in the air,' indicating potential movement toward shared ground between banks and crypto representatives regarding stablecoin regulations.

QWhat was the key concession made by banks during the White House meeting on stablecoins?

ABanks made a key concession by accepting language that included possible exemptions for stablecoin rewards, which had previously been off the table, opening the possibility for transaction-based rewards under tightly defined conditions.

QHow could the outcome of these negotiations affect Ripple and its stablecoin RLUSD?

AThe outcome could directly influence how Ripple structures its stablecoin services, particularly regarding permissible activities for offering rewards, which may also have potential effects on XRP.

QWhat was the major point of debate between crypto representatives and banks during the meeting?

AThe major point of debate was the definition of permissible activities, with crypto representatives pushing for broader definitions to provide clarity for stablecoins, while banks argued for narrower boundaries to reduce risks to the financial system.

QBy when did the White House urge both parties to reach an agreement on stablecoin regulations?

AThe White House urged both parties to reach an agreement by March 1, 2026, with further discussions expected in the coming days.

Lecturas Relacionadas

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Qué es XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nueva Frontera en el Panorama de las Criptomonedas Introducción a XRP 2.0 En el siempre cambiante ámbito de las criptomonedas, nuevos proyectos surgen continuamente, compitiendo por atención y adopción. Una de estas iniciativas prometedoras es XRP 2.0, un nuevo proyecto de criptomoneda diseñado para aprovechar la tecnología blockchain avanzada y metodologías de encriptación robustas. Aunque el nombre establece paralelismos con el XRP de Ripple, es crucial señalar que XRP 2.0 opera de manera independiente, enfocándose en mejorar la seguridad de las transacciones, la privacidad y la escalabilidad. A medida que el panorama financiero digital abraza cada vez más soluciones descentralizadas, XRP 2.0 busca contribuir de manera significativa a web3 y a la expansión general de los proyectos de criptomonedas. ¿Qué es XRP 2.0? En esencia, XRP 2.0 es un proyecto de criptomoneda que busca crear un ecosistema de moneda digital seguro y descentralizado. Su tecnología fundamental integra principios avanzados de blockchain con técnicas de encriptación de vanguardia. El objetivo principal de XRP 2.0 es establecerse como una plataforma confiable y eficiente que permita la ejecución rápida de transacciones mientras prioriza la protección de la privacidad de sus usuarios. El proyecto se promociona como una solución a muchas limitaciones enfrentadas por las criptomonedas existentes, proponiendo un sistema que puede manejar un mayor volumen de transacciones con mejor velocidad y privacidad. Esta versatilidad posiciona a XRP 2.0 como un competidor significativo en un mercado plagado de diversas monedas digitales. ¿Quién es el Creador de XRP 2.0? La identidad del creador detrás de XRP 2.0 ha sido señalada como 'Wilbur.' Sin embargo, los detalles completos sobre Wilbur o su entidad asociada siguen siendo elusivos. La anonimidad de muchos creadores de criptomonedas no es un fenómeno poco común en la industria, a menudo diseñado para mantener un grado de privacidad y seguridad. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de XRP 2.0? Hasta ahora, la información específica relacionada con las fundaciones o organizaciones de inversión que apoyan a XRP 2.0 no está disponible públicamente. En el sector de las criptomonedas, el respaldo de inversores respetables puede influir significativamente en la credibilidad y el éxito de un proyecto, sin embargo, la transparencia sobre los patrocinadores financieros de XRP 2.0 no se ha establecido. ¿Cómo Funciona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 se destaca al emplear una combinación de tecnología blockchain y algoritmos de encriptación avanzados que aseguran transacciones seguras y descentralizadas. Su estructura innovadora incluye características únicas diseñadas para fomentar el compromiso del usuario y ampliar las funcionalidades más allá de las transacciones convencionales de criptomonedas. Entre estas características, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacidades impulsadas por IA, como funcionalidades de texto a imagen y de texto a voz. Estas adiciones están diseñadas para mejorar la experiencia interactiva de los usuarios, promoviendo una mayor aplicabilidad en diversos sectores. Al unir avances tecnológicos con un diseño centrado en el usuario, XRP 2.0 busca captar la atención de una amplia gama de individuos y empresas que buscan integrar soluciones de criptomonedas en sus marcos operativos. Cronología de XRP 2.0 Entender XRP 2.0 requiere examinar los hitos que han definido su viaje hasta ahora: 23 de julio de 2023: Se presenta XRP 2.0 como un nuevo proyecto de criptomonedas, con el objetivo de revolucionar las capacidades de transacciones seguras y descentralizadas en el ámbito de blockchain. 8 de septiembre de 2023: Se lanza otro proyecto, XRP20, marcando la aparición de un token ERC-20 en la blockchain de Ethereum que no guarda relación con XRP 2.0. 13 de noviembre de 2023: El Libro Mayor de XRP experimenta una actualización significativa con el lanzamiento de la versión 2.0.0 del software del servidor rippled. Es esencial señalar que este desarrollo está desconectado del proyecto de criptomonedas XRP 2.0. Puntos Clave sobre XRP 2.0 Para destilar la esencia de XRP 2.0, surgen varios factores críticos: Características Únicas: La inclusión de características como texto a imagen y texto a voz impulsadas por IA diversifica aún más las aplicaciones potenciales de XRP 2.0. Tecnología Blockchain: El marco utiliza mecanismos avanzados de blockchain y protocolos de encriptación, asegurando un entorno seguro y descentralizado para las transacciones. Escalabilidad y Privacidad: XRP 2.0 prioriza la protección mejorada de la privacidad en los procesos de transacción y la escalabilidad necesaria para acomodar una base de usuarios creciente. No Afiliación con Ripple: Es importante destacar que, a pesar de su nombre, XRP 2.0 no tiene ninguna lealtad ni colaboración con el XRP de Ripple, diferenciando su marco operativo y objetivos dentro del ecosistema de criptomonedas. Conclusión XRP 2.0 representa una ambiciosa aventura en la esfera de las criptomonedas, buscando ofrecer una combinación de seguridad, privacidad y eficiencia en las transacciones digitales. Al integrar tecnologías sofisticadas y características amigables para el usuario, el proyecto se propone ampliar los horizontes de lo que la criptomoneda puede lograr en la economía digital de hoy. Si bien la anonimidad de su creador y la falta de inversores revelados pueden generar cuestionamientos para algunos, el enfoque de XRP 2.0 en funcionalidades avanzadas y descentralización realza su atractivo en un mercado de criptomonedas cada vez más abarrotado. A medida que el paisaje de las criptomonedas sigue evolucionando, XRP 2.0 podría emerger como un jugador crucial en la expansión de soluciones blockchain seguras y escalables.

174 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.05Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Qué es XRP 2.0

Cómo comprar XRP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar XRP (XRP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar XRP (XRP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu XRP (XRP)Después de comprar tu XRP (XRP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear XRP (XRP)Tradear fácilmente con XRP (XRP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.4k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar XRP

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de XRP (XRP).

活动图片