Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, but Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-23Actualizado a 2025-12-23

Resumen

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced the integration of a blockchain-based shared ledger into its infrastructure, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer-2 network Linea, to enable secure, real-time, and interoperable digital finance. This move, supported by major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank, aims to bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets using zk-EVM technology for faster, cheaper, and more transparent settlements. While Ripple pioneered blockchain-based cross-border payments with XRP Ledger and achieved significant legal and operational milestones—including court victories against the SEC and expansion into 40+ markets—its reach remains limited compared to Swift’s global network of over 11,000 institutions. Ripple’s model relies heavily on XRP as a bridge currency, whereas Swift’s asset-agnostic approach supports multiple currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs, reducing dependency on any single asset. Swift’s adoption of blockchain signals a major shift in global finance, potentially freeing trillions in trapped capital and enabling 24/7 real-time settlement. This transition from legacy systems to mathematically verified transactions represents a convergence of TradFi and DeFi, positioning Swift to dominate the next era of value transfer.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

During the Sibos 2025 conference in Frankfurt, Swift's Chief Business Officer Thierry Chilosi and Standard Chartered Bank's Global Head of Transaction Banking, Michael Spiegel, discussed the major transformation of global finance. As tokenization moves from pilot programs to reality, Swift officially announced the addition of a blockchain-based shared ledger to its infrastructure, aiming to achieve trusted and interoperable digital finance on a global scale. This ledger will serve as a secure, real-time transaction record between financial institutions, using smart contracts to validate transaction sequences and execute agreed-upon rules. It is designed to complement existing systems and seamlessly bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets.

Image Source: Swift Official Website

Although Swift did not explicitly mention the technical platform when initially announcing this major news to the banking industry, Consensys CEO Joe Lubin revealed at the Token2049 conference in Singapore that Swift is leveraging the Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea to build its new payment settlement platform. By adopting Linea's zk-EVM rollup technology, Swift can significantly reduce costs and latency while meeting the financial industry's stringent requirements for 24/7 real-time settlement and security. Currently, over 30 top global financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citibank, are preparing to participate in the pilot of this new blockchain-based payment rail built on Linea.

Ripple's Deep Cultivation and Current Status

Before discussing Swift, we must revisit the pioneer that challenged the old system for over a decade: Ripple.

In 2012, Ripple emerged with the XRP Ledger (XRPL), with the core goal of replacing the inefficient Swift correspondent banking model. During this period, Ripple successfully built the global payment network RippleNet, connecting over 300 financial institutions. In fragmented markets like Southeast Asia, its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service demonstrated that XRP, as a bridge currency, could reduce cross-border settlement times from days to just 3 to 5 seconds.

By 2020, affected by the U.S. SEC lawsuit, Ripple faced a blockade and stagnation in the U.S. market due to securities allegations, but its global scale continued to expand. By 2022, its business had reached over 40 payment markets, with total payment volume doubling to approximately $30 billion.

In 2023, Ripple saw a turning point when the court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, marking a milestone victory for Ripple and the industry.

In August 2025, with the SEC completely abandoning its appeal, the five-year legal battle came to an end. The full clarification of its legal status led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its official entry into mainstream institutional asset allocation portfolios.

Today, Ripple is conducting cross-border payment and receipt businesses in multiple real-world scenarios, ranging from retail remittances (To C) to enterprise-level payments (To B).

In the retail sector, Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to bridge real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, significantly reducing the pre-funding costs for overseas workers; Santander Bank offers transparent real-time transfers to its customers through the One Pay FX app. Meanwhile, the Southeast Asian payment platform Tranglo has significantly improved the efficiency of peso and baht settlements with the support of Ripple ODL.

At the enterprise level, American Express and PNC Bank utilize RippleNet to optimize B2B trade settlements and international payment experiences, respectively.

Additionally, in national infrastructure, Ripple is collaborating with over 20 countries, including Palau, Montenegro, and Bhutan, to develop CBDC platforms, applying blockchain technology to the issuance and清算体系 of sovereign currencies.

Why Did Swift Choose Linea?

When giants布局 the Ethereum ecosystem, they have shown a high degree of consistency in their preference for Layer 2 technology: Coinbase's Base chain is built on OP Stack, and Robinhood announced this year the launch of Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum technology to support the tokenization and 24/7 trading of RWA.

This preference stems from L2's ability to leverage Ethereum's security while meeting high-performance needs through a modular architecture. The core difference between Swift's choice of Linea over OP or Arbitrum lies in the underlying validation logic.

OP and Arbitrum use Optimistic Rollup, which operates on the logic of assuming transactions are valid by default and only verifying them if challenged. Asset withdrawals typically require a multi-day challenge period, which is a significant time cost for financial清算追求流动性.

Linea, on the other hand, uses zk-EVM, which provides instant validity proofs mathematically. For Swift and its partner banks handling massive value settlements, zk-EVM not only offers faster finality but also ensures compliance verification while protecting transaction privacy.

Swift's choice of Linea embodies the first principle of capital operation: maximizing flow velocity.

Capital will flow like a fluid from the low-velocity (requiring large amounts of idle准备金预存 in Nostro/Vostro accounts), high-friction (layered fees from correspondent banks), slow-settlement (days-long settlement) telegraphic instruction traditional system to a high-velocity, low-friction, fast-settlement blockchain digital system.

Swift handles approximately $150 trillion in global payments annually. If it can achieve atomic-level reconciliation and 24/7 real-time settlement through Linea's technology stack, it means that trillions of dollars in准备金积压 in the global financial system, originally held to hedge against清算延迟, will be released and reinjected into the real economy.

As Consensys CEO Joe Lubin stated at the Token 2049 conference in Singapore, this is not merely a technological upgrade but the true convergence of TradFi and DeFi, marking the global value transfer protocol's official transition from the "telegraphic instruction era" to the "mathematical verification era."

The Significance of Swift Embracing Blockchain

As the global financial backbone network handling approximately $150 trillion in transaction volume annually, Swift's decision to build its ledger on Linea, an Ethereum Layer 2, signifies that blockchain technology will become the heart of mainstream finance.

Swift will eliminate fragmentation between different tokenized networks through unified technical standards, breaking down the long-standing barrier between TradFi and DeFi, and implanting the efficiency genes of decentralized finance into the traditional清算体系.

Through a 24/7 operational real-time ledger, global financial institutions will no longer be constrained by the cumbersome manual reconciliation and time-zone delays of the correspondent banking model. The massive amounts of capital积压 in correspondent bank accounts, originally held to hedge against清算风险, will be effectively released. This will allow the speed of capital flow to truly match the demands of the modern economy, ushering in a new era of global value transfer that is more transparent, lower cost, and更具互操作性.

Ripple struggled for a decade to build a new city based on the XRP Ledger outside the old system, but the scale of financial institutions it currently connects appears势单力薄 compared to Swift's存量 network covering over 11,000 institutions across more than 200 countries.

The core threat from Swift lies in its "asset neutrality." Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which heavily relies on XRP as a bridge currency, Swift's blockchain ledger is designed to support multiple assets, including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs.

Banks within the Swift system can achieve instant settlement by upgrading their existing rails without bearing the volatility risk of a single asset. This combination of "存量优势 + technical compliance" is giving Ripple its most透骨的寒意 since its inception.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core innovation announced by Swift at Sibos 2025, and what technology is it built on?

ASwift announced the addition of a new blockchain-based shared ledger to its infrastructure, built on the Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea, utilizing its zk-EVM rollup technology.

QHow does Ripple's ODL (On-Demand Liquidity) service using XRP improve cross-border payments?

ARipple's ODL service uses XRP as a bridge currency to reduce cross-border settlement times from several days to just 3 to 5 seconds, significantly lowering the cost of pre-funding for overseas payments.

QWhat key advantage does a zk-EVM rollup (like Linea) have over an Optimistic Rollup for a financial settlement network?

AA zk-EVM rollup provides instant validity proofs for transactions, enabling faster finality and near-instant withdrawals. This is superior to Optimistic Rollups, which have a multi-day challenge period for withdrawals, creating undesirable delays for high-value financial settlements.

QWhat major legal victory did Ripple achieve in 2023, and what was a significant consequence of its final resolution in 2025?

AIn 2023, a court ruled that XRP itself is not a security. In 2025, the SEC abandoned its appeal, which led to the approval of XRP spot ETFs, marking its entry into mainstream institutional asset allocation.

QWhy does the article suggest Swift's new platform poses a fundamental threat to Ripple's business model?

ASwift's threat stems from its 'asset neutrality' and massive existing network. Unlike Ripple's model which relies heavily on the XRP asset, Swift's ledger is designed to support multiple assets (fiat, stablecoins, CBDCs), allowing its vast network of over 11,000 banks to upgrade for instant settlement without exposure to a single asset's volatility.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar O

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar O1 exchange (O) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu O1 exchange (O)Después de comprar tu O1 exchange (O), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear O1 exchange (O)Tradear fácilmente con O1 exchange (O) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

128 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.19Actualizado en 2026.06.29

Cómo comprar O

Cómo comprar PROS

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Pharos (PROS) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Pharos (PROS)Después de comprar tu Pharos (PROS), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Pharos (PROS)Tradear fácilmente con Pharos (PROS) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

146 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.22Actualizado en 2026.06.29

Cómo comprar PROS

Qué es VERONA

I. Introducción al Proyecto VERONA es una blockchain construida para todos, en todas partes a través de la abstracción de cadenas. Utilizando su capa de Abstracción Generalizada, VERONA se distingue por integrar funcionalidades complejas de blockchain, como cuentas, firmas e interoperabilidad, directamente a nivel de protocolo. Este enfoque permite interactuar con aplicaciones de blockchain sin necesidad de entender las tecnologías subyacentes.1) Información Básica Nombre: VERONA (VERONA)III. Enlaces Relacionados Enlace al sitio web oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Libro Blanco: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Redes Sociales: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: La introducción del proyecto proviene de los materiales publicados o proporcionados por el equipo oficial del proyecto, que es solo para referencia y no constituye asesoramiento de inversión. HTX no se hace responsable de ninguna pérdida directa o indirecta resultante.

171 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.22Actualizado en 2026.06.22

Qué es VERONA

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de A (A).

活动图片