Ripple CEO Says Clarity Act Has 90% Chance of Passing by April

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse estimates a 90% chance that the Clarity Act will pass through the U.S. Congress by the end of April, following recent discussions between crypto industry leaders and regulators. The bill aims to provide jurisdictional clarity by defining whether digital assets are securities or commodities, with key regulatory roles for the SEC and CFTC. While some complex issues, particularly around stablecoin regulation, remain, Garlinghouse noted that negotiations have narrowed outstanding disagreements. Passage of the act would mark a significant shift in U.S. crypto regulation, potentially encouraging greater institutional involvement by resolving long-standing legal uncertainties.

Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, stated that he thinks the Clarity Act will be passed through the U.S. Congress by the end of April. Garlinghouse estimated that there was a 90% chance of this happening, based on the recent talks in Washington. This was said during and after a meeting at the White House that was held between the leaders of the crypto industry and the banking regulators.

During an interview with Fox Business, Garlinghouse stated that stakeholders focused on the foundational aspects of the bill, such as jurisdictional clarity. The bill seeks to establish the regulatory jurisdiction of major U.S. agencies over digital assets. The bill will provide clarity on whether certain tokens qualify as securities or commodities.

Garlinghouse pointed out that many of the outstanding issues had been narrowed down after talks between the industry and the regulators. This came after several weeks of negotiations between lawmakers, the crypto industry, and Treasury officials. The stablecoin provisions were also part of the talks. The stablecoin yield provisions have made the initial versions of the bill complicated.

However, Garlinghouse also admitted that a compromise may be required to pass the legislation this spring. Other industry officials and prediction markets have also cited a narrowing timeline. Legislators are hoping to move the Clarity Act forward before the congressional recess in April. Some estimates place the chances of passage slightly lower than Garlinghouse’s estimate, but still high.

Regulatory Environment and Industry Implications

The Clarity Act aims to offer long-overdue federal regulatory clarity regarding digital asset regulation. It would provide a clearer definition of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Industry insiders believe that regulatory clarity could encourage institutional involvement.

Lack of a clear legal framework has resulted in enforcement uncertainty and innovation stagnation for businesses. Regulations on the issuance and trading of stablecoins are some of the most contentious issues in the bill. The White House and Senate panels have been working to reconcile these differences. Passage by Congress would represent a major change in the course of U.S. crypto regulation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Metaplanet CEO Defends Disclosure Practices Amid Bitcoin Strategy Criticism

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the estimated probability that the Clarity Act will pass by the end of April, according to Ripple's CEO?

ABrad Garlinghouse estimates there is a 90% chance that the Clarity Act will be passed by the U.S. Congress by the end of April.

QWhat was the main focus of the discussions between crypto industry leaders and regulators at the White House meeting?

AThe discussions focused on the foundational aspects of the Clarity Act, particularly on establishing jurisdictional clarity for major U.S. agencies over digital assets and determining whether certain tokens qualify as securities or commodities.

QWhy does the article suggest that a compromise might be necessary for the Clarity Act to pass this spring?

AA compromise may be required due to the contentious issues within the bill, such as the regulations on the issuance and trading of stablecoins, which have made the initial versions complicated and require reconciliation of differences.

QWhat are the two major U.S. regulatory agencies that the Clarity Act seeks to define jurisdiction between for digital assets?

AThe Clarity Act seeks to provide a clearer definition of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

QWhat potential positive outcome does the article suggest could result from providing regulatory clarity for digital assets?

AIndustry insiders believe that regulatory clarity could encourage greater institutional involvement in the crypto industry, as a clear legal framework would reduce enforcement uncertainty and help overcome innovation stagnation.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot