Reshuffling the Discourse Power of U.S. Innovative Finance: Who Has Secured a Seat at the CFTC Table?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-15Actualizado a 2026-02-15

Resumen

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has announced the members of its newly formed Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), signaling a strategic shift toward proactive engagement with financial innovation. Replacing the former Technical Advisory Committee, the IAC includes 35 representatives from major crypto exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken), DeFi and infrastructure leaders (Uniswap, Solana, Chainlink), top VCs (a16z, Paradigm), prediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi), traditional financial institutions (Nasdaq, CME, ICE), and academics. Chaired by CFTC’s Michael S. Selig, the committee will advise on emerging technologies—including AI and blockchain—and their impact on derivatives and commodity markets. The move reflects a shift from reactive regulation to collaborative governance, integrating diverse industry voices into the rulemaking process. Key implications include legitimization of prediction markets, formal recognition of DeFi and public chains, and enhanced advantages for compliant crypto platforms. The IAC aims to help design adaptive regulations that foster responsible innovation while maintaining market integrity.

Original Title: "Who Is at the CFTC Table? A Redistribution of Discourse Power in U.S. Innovative Finance"

Written by: KarenZ, Foresight News

On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) officially released Announcement No. 9182-26, announcing the list of members for the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC).

If you think this is just a routine list of "external advisors" for a regulatory agency, you are sorely mistaken.

This list, which brings together traditional financial giants, leading platforms in the crypto industry, DeFi infrastructure providers, top venture capital institutions, and academic representatives, is not merely the formation of an industry advisory group. Instead, it is a critical step in the implementation of the collaborative framework for innovative financial market supervision established by the CFTC under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

The Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), spearheaded by CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig and evolved from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), sends a clear signal from its establishment purpose to its final lineup: U.S. regulators are actively embracing crypto and fintech innovation, shifting from "passive regulation" to "collaborative governance."

Star-Studded Lineup: A Full House from Exchanges and DeFi to Traditional Finance

Unlike previous instances where regulatory agencies invited one or two crypto representatives for "window dressing," this CFTC IAC committee list can be described as an "all-star lineup," encompassing 35 members from traditional financial giants, crypto trading platforms, DeFi protocols, blockchain infrastructure providers, investment institutions, academic representatives, and more.

1、CEX

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong
Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi
Gemini CEO Tyler Winklevoss
Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev
Blockchain.com CEO Peter Smith
Bullish CEO Tom Farley
Bitnomial CEO Luke Hoersten

2、Prediction Markets

Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan
Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour
FanDuel President Christian Genetski
DraftKings CEO Jason Robins

3、DeFi and Public Chain Infrastructure

Uniswap Labs CEO Hayden Adams
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse
Solana Labs CEO Anatoly Yakovenko
Chainlink Labs CEO Sergey Nazarov
Etherealize CEO (Ethereum promotion and product startup) Vivek Raman

4、Top Crypto VCs

a16z crypto Managing Partner Chris Dixon
Paradigm Managing Partner Alana Palmedo
Framework Ventures Co-Founder Vance Spencer

5、Digital Asset Custody, Asset Management

Anchorage Digital CEO Nathan McCauley
Grayscale CEO Peter Mintzberg

6、Traditional Finance, Clearing, and Trading Institutions

Option Clearing Corporation CEO Andrej Bolkovic
Rothera Markets (Derivatives Exchange and Clearinghouse) CEO Thomas Chippas
Cboe Global Markets CEO Craig Donohue
CME Group CEO Terry Duffy
Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation President & CEO Frank LaSalla
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) CEO Scott D. O’Malia
London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) CEO David Schwimmer
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) CEO Jeff Sprecher
DRW (Trading Firm) CEO Don Wilson

7、Academic and Compliance Representatives

Professor Harry Crane, Professor Carla Reyes

8、Others

Futures Industry Association (FIA) CEO Walt Lukken

The CFTC explicitly stated that the core responsibility of the IAC is to provide professional advice on cutting-edge innovations in the derivatives and commodities markets, with a focus on how technologies like AI and blockchain are reshaping the markets, helping to formulate "adaptive rules" and maintain the effectiveness of financial regulation.

Regulatory Logic: Top-Level Collaboration

The IAC is not a temporary body but a long-term design by the CFTC for the golden age of the U.S. financial market, providing professional advice on technological innovation in financial markets.

According to CFTC Announcement No. 9167-26 issued on January 12, 2026, Michael S. Selig had already defined the IAC's positioning a month prior:

Establishment Background: Replacing the former Technical Advisory Committee: This name change is not mere wordplay. Under Michael S. Selig's leadership, the CFTC clearly recognizes that merely discussing blockchain or AI technology is outdated; what is needed now is discussion about the entirely new financial business models catalyzed by these technologies.
Core Work: The IAC focuses on areas where finance and technology intersect (such as blockchain, digital assets, AI, etc.), balancing perspectives from the financial industry, regulatory agencies, fintech providers, academic institutions, and others to help the CFTC understand the impact of technological innovation and guide the application of new technologies in financial markets. It serves only in an advisory, suggestion-making capacity and has no actual decision-making power.
Operational Details: The CFTC provides support, with an annual operating cost of approximately $170,000; members work without remuneration. Additionally, the CFTC will appoint a designated federal officer to oversee all matters including meetings, compliance, training, etc. The committee will meet at least once a year, and subcommittees can meet as needed.

This means the past situation of "long-distance dialogue" between the industry and regulators is broken. DeFi representatives, CEXs, traditional exchanges, clearinghouses, and VCs are now "sitting at the same table." The CFTC can directly obtain the most frontline market insights and advice, preventing rulemaking from becoming detached from reality.

What Does This Mean for Web3?

The finalization of the IAC list has at least the following clear implications for the crypto industry:

1. The "Legitimization" Coronation of Prediction Markets

On the IAC list, the inclusion of Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour is particularly eye-catching.

After the prolonged tug-of-war with regulators over whether "election prediction" constitutes gambling, the CFTC's move is equivalent to recognizing prediction markets' financial status as "event contracts." More interestingly, the list also includes the presidents of DraftKings and FanDuel—this signifies that the boundaries between sports betting, financial derivatives, and on-chain prediction markets are blurring.

This shift is particularly evident in the regulation of prediction markets. In February 2026, the CFTC announced the withdrawal of the proposed "Event Contracts" rule released in 2024. At that time, CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig stated bluntly: "The 2024 event contract-related proposal reflected the previous administration's hasty regulation seeking a comprehensive ban on political contracts ahead of the 2024 presidential election." The CFTC will advance new rulemaking based on a rational interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act that aligns with Congressional intent and promotes responsible innovation in derivatives markets.

2. DeFi and Public Chains Gain an Official "Formal Seat"

The selection of Uniswap, Solana, Chainlink, and Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman (an Ethereum promotion and product startup), among other DeFi and public chain projects or related startups, is not only recognition of DeFi's infrastructural role but also signifies that the CFTC is beginning to acknowledge, from the technical foundation, that code is market structure. Debates about "whether DeFi frontends need licenses" may shift towards the more pragmatic question of "how to make the protocol layer compliant."

3. Further Solidification of "Compliance Dividends" for Leading Platforms

The entry of institutions like Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini, which have long focused on U.S. compliance, into the core advisory layer means that future CFTC rulemaking will be more aligned with the operational logic of these platforms. The competitive advantage of compliant players will continue to grow.

These platforms, through their deep engagement with regulators, will gain significant advantages in license acquisition and business innovation. The Matthew effect in the industry will intensify further, which will also pressure smaller platforms to accelerate their compliance efforts, driving the overall compliance upgrade of the crypto industry.

Summary

The CFTC's core regulatory areas are derivatives and commodities markets. Innovative areas like crypto derivatives, digital asset futures, blockchain clearing and settlement, and prediction markets are becoming core development directions within this domain.

The establishment of the IAC represents a regulatory paradigm upgrade driven by the CFTC, shifting towards "proactive rule design in the early stages of innovation" and "adaptive regulation based on market realities."

The core of this upgrade is essentially a renewed understanding of the symbiotic relationship between regulation and innovation: financial technology innovation is not the opposite of regulation but a core driver of financial market modernization. The core role of regulation is not to hinder innovation but to define its boundaries, prevent risks, and allow innovation to realize its value within a compliant framework.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the significance of the CFTC's Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) and its new membership list?

AThe CFTC's IAC membership list signifies a major shift in U.S. regulatory approach, moving from 'passive regulation' to 'collaborative governance.' It is a key step in building a collaborative framework for regulating innovative financial markets, actively embracing crypto and fintech innovation. The committee's role is to provide expert advice on frontier innovations in derivatives and commodity markets, focusing on technologies like AI and blockchain.

QWhich major sectors and companies are represented in the CFTC's IAC membership?

AThe IAC membership is a 'all-star lineup' covering major sectors including Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) like Coinbase and Kraken, Prediction Markets like Polymarket, DeFi and public chain infrastructure like Uniswap and Solana, top crypto VCs like a16z crypto, digital asset custodians and managers like Grayscale, traditional financial and clearing institutions like Nasdaq and CME Group, and academic representatives.

QHow does the formation of the IAC impact the prediction market and DeFi sectors specifically?

AFor prediction markets, the inclusion of CEOs from Polymarket and Kalshi is seen as a legitimization, acknowledging their status as 'event contracts' and blurring the lines with sports betting and financial derivatives. For DeFi, the inclusion of projects like Uniswap and Solana represents official recognition of their infrastructure status, shifting regulatory debate from 'whether DeFi front-ends need licenses' to 'how to make the protocol layer compliant'.

QWhat are the stated core responsibilities and operational details of the IAC?

AThe IAC's core responsibility is to provide professional advice on frontier innovations in derivatives and commodity markets, focusing on how technologies like AI and blockchain are restructuring markets, and to help formulate 'adaptive rules' to maintain effective financial regulation. It operates with support from the CFTC at an annual cost of about $170,000, members serve without pay, and it is required to meet at least once a year, with subcommittees meeting as needed.

QWhat broader shift in regulatory philosophy does the establishment of the IAC represent according to the article?

AThe establishment of the IAC represents a paradigm shift in regulatory philosophy towards 'proactive rule design in the early stages of innovation' and 'adaptive regulation based on market reality.' It reflects a renewed understanding that financial innovation is not the opposite of regulation but a core driver of financial market modernization, and the role of regulation is to set boundaries and prevent risks, allowing innovation to create value within a compliant framework.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Xiaohongshu's Second Great Voyage, This Time Sailing Towards AI

Xiaohongshu's Second Voyage: Navigating Towards AI Since ChatGPT's emergence, Xiaohongshu's founder Mao Wenchao has been acutely aware of AI's potential threat, recognizing that the life advice people seek from chatbots overlaps directly with his platform's core business. Founded in 2013 as a PDF shopping guide for Chinese tourists, Xiaohongshu evolved into a massive community where millions share authentic, personal experiences—from product reviews to travel tips. This vast repository of "I've tried this" human judgment became its most valuable asset. However, the rise of AI, which delivers instant answers, challenges the very need for users to sift through numerous personal notes. Fearing its treasure trove of lived experience could become mere training data for others, Xiaohongshu is proactively adapting. In 2026, it established a dedicated AI division (Dots), launched RED Skill to turn user experiences into usable AI tools, and acquired the AI search product "Diandian." Its investments now extend to AI firms like MiniMax and hardware startups, moving upstream to address needs before they even become search queries. The platform's commercialization strategy is also evolving. With a newly acquired payment license and tools like the AIPS model to track consumer decision journeys, Xiaohongshu aims to seamlessly integrate recommendations with transactions, embedding commerce within AI-generated answers. Yet, a critical tension remains. While building smarter machines to organize and leverage its human experiences, Xiaohongshu must prevent AI from drowning out the authentic, flawed, and trustworthy "I've tried this" voices that built its community. Its core challenge is to harness AI's power without letting the map—the machine's perfect, synthesized answer—replace the territory of genuine human experience. This balance between technological advancement and preserving human trust defines its current journey and its future.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Xiaohongshu's Second Great Voyage, This Time Sailing Towards AI

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

SharpLink CEO: How to Interpret Ethereum Developers Surpassing 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing one million historical developers, a figure unmatched in crypto. Based on Electric Capital data and observations from Asian developer hubs, the article argues that Ethereum’s true strength isn't raw speed, but where top builders choose to build long-term. The core advantage is a decade-deep ecosystem of standards, tools, liquidity, and culture. Of the over one million developers, about 232,000 were active in the past year, working on hard problems: protocol scalability (e.g., the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade), synchronous composability across rollups, and post-quantum security preparedness. Ethereum’s defensibility stems from network effects beyond numbers: deep composability (the "financial Lego" of DeFi), the universal EVM/Solidity stack, credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), and its role as the trusted settlement layer for major institutions. The convergence of top researchers, a modular rollup ecosystem, and a culture of long-term thinking create a compounding advantage that is difficult to replicate. The conclusion is that Ethereum has consolidated its position as the default operating system for programmable finance and internet-native capital, attracting the builders who are architecting the next generation of financial infrastructure.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

SharpLink CEO: How to Interpret Ethereum Developers Surpassing 1 Million?

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Hace 42 min(s)

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Hace 42 min(s)

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Identity Protocol to AI Gateway: How Ambitious Is World?

The article discusses Worldcoin's (WLD) evolution from a "proof of personhood" network to a potential identity infrastructure for the AI era. Initially focused on unique digital identities via iris scans, Worldcoin faced skepticism over real-world use cases. However, entering "The Simple Plan" Phase 3, it's shifting from token incentives to utility-driven growth. Key applications are emerging: enterprise solutions (e.g., deepfake verification with Zoom, Okta), consumer use cases (e.g., reducing bots on Tinder or in ticket sales), and notably, the AI Agent sector via AgentKit, which aims to establish trusted authorization between humans and AI agents. The author argues AI's proliferation makes authentic human identity a scarce and valuable resource. Worldcoin's strategy is now focused on key markets for network effects and developing self-service Orb hardware to scale sustainably. The launch of World ID 4.0 introduces a fee model for issuers/protocols, creating a potential revenue stream. In conclusion, WLD's rise reflects a market reassessment. Worldcoin's ambition is to become the foundational identity layer and crucial entry point for the coming AI Agent economy, moving crypto narratives beyond finance into verifiable human identity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Identity Protocol to AI Gateway: How Ambitious Is World?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros