Reshuffling the Discourse Power of U.S. Innovative Finance: Who Has Secured a Seat at the CFTC Table?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-15Actualizado a 2026-02-15

Resumen

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has announced the members of its newly formed Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), signaling a strategic shift toward proactive engagement with financial innovation. Replacing the former Technical Advisory Committee, the IAC includes 35 representatives from major crypto exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken), DeFi and infrastructure leaders (Uniswap, Solana, Chainlink), top VCs (a16z, Paradigm), prediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi), traditional financial institutions (Nasdaq, CME, ICE), and academics. Chaired by CFTC’s Michael S. Selig, the committee will advise on emerging technologies—including AI and blockchain—and their impact on derivatives and commodity markets. The move reflects a shift from reactive regulation to collaborative governance, integrating diverse industry voices into the rulemaking process. Key implications include legitimization of prediction markets, formal recognition of DeFi and public chains, and enhanced advantages for compliant crypto platforms. The IAC aims to help design adaptive regulations that foster responsible innovation while maintaining market integrity.

Original Title: "Who Is at the CFTC Table? A Redistribution of Discourse Power in U.S. Innovative Finance"

Written by: KarenZ, Foresight News

On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) officially released Announcement No. 9182-26, announcing the list of members for the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC).

If you think this is just a routine list of "external advisors" for a regulatory agency, you are sorely mistaken.

This list, which brings together traditional financial giants, leading platforms in the crypto industry, DeFi infrastructure providers, top venture capital institutions, and academic representatives, is not merely the formation of an industry advisory group. Instead, it is a critical step in the implementation of the collaborative framework for innovative financial market supervision established by the CFTC under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

The Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), spearheaded by CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig and evolved from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), sends a clear signal from its establishment purpose to its final lineup: U.S. regulators are actively embracing crypto and fintech innovation, shifting from "passive regulation" to "collaborative governance."

Star-Studded Lineup: A Full House from Exchanges and DeFi to Traditional Finance

Unlike previous instances where regulatory agencies invited one or two crypto representatives for "window dressing," this CFTC IAC committee list can be described as an "all-star lineup," encompassing 35 members from traditional financial giants, crypto trading platforms, DeFi protocols, blockchain infrastructure providers, investment institutions, academic representatives, and more.

1、CEX

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong
Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi
Gemini CEO Tyler Winklevoss
Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev
Blockchain.com CEO Peter Smith
Bullish CEO Tom Farley
Bitnomial CEO Luke Hoersten

2、Prediction Markets

Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan
Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour
FanDuel President Christian Genetski
DraftKings CEO Jason Robins

3、DeFi and Public Chain Infrastructure

Uniswap Labs CEO Hayden Adams
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse
Solana Labs CEO Anatoly Yakovenko
Chainlink Labs CEO Sergey Nazarov
Etherealize CEO (Ethereum promotion and product startup) Vivek Raman

4、Top Crypto VCs

a16z crypto Managing Partner Chris Dixon
Paradigm Managing Partner Alana Palmedo
Framework Ventures Co-Founder Vance Spencer

5、Digital Asset Custody, Asset Management

Anchorage Digital CEO Nathan McCauley
Grayscale CEO Peter Mintzberg

6、Traditional Finance, Clearing, and Trading Institutions

Option Clearing Corporation CEO Andrej Bolkovic
Rothera Markets (Derivatives Exchange and Clearinghouse) CEO Thomas Chippas
Cboe Global Markets CEO Craig Donohue
CME Group CEO Terry Duffy
Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation President & CEO Frank LaSalla
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) CEO Scott D. O’Malia
London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) CEO David Schwimmer
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) CEO Jeff Sprecher
DRW (Trading Firm) CEO Don Wilson

7、Academic and Compliance Representatives

Professor Harry Crane, Professor Carla Reyes

8、Others

Futures Industry Association (FIA) CEO Walt Lukken

The CFTC explicitly stated that the core responsibility of the IAC is to provide professional advice on cutting-edge innovations in the derivatives and commodities markets, with a focus on how technologies like AI and blockchain are reshaping the markets, helping to formulate "adaptive rules" and maintain the effectiveness of financial regulation.

Regulatory Logic: Top-Level Collaboration

The IAC is not a temporary body but a long-term design by the CFTC for the golden age of the U.S. financial market, providing professional advice on technological innovation in financial markets.

According to CFTC Announcement No. 9167-26 issued on January 12, 2026, Michael S. Selig had already defined the IAC's positioning a month prior:

Establishment Background: Replacing the former Technical Advisory Committee: This name change is not mere wordplay. Under Michael S. Selig's leadership, the CFTC clearly recognizes that merely discussing blockchain or AI technology is outdated; what is needed now is discussion about the entirely new financial business models catalyzed by these technologies.
Core Work: The IAC focuses on areas where finance and technology intersect (such as blockchain, digital assets, AI, etc.), balancing perspectives from the financial industry, regulatory agencies, fintech providers, academic institutions, and others to help the CFTC understand the impact of technological innovation and guide the application of new technologies in financial markets. It serves only in an advisory, suggestion-making capacity and has no actual decision-making power.
Operational Details: The CFTC provides support, with an annual operating cost of approximately $170,000; members work without remuneration. Additionally, the CFTC will appoint a designated federal officer to oversee all matters including meetings, compliance, training, etc. The committee will meet at least once a year, and subcommittees can meet as needed.

This means the past situation of "long-distance dialogue" between the industry and regulators is broken. DeFi representatives, CEXs, traditional exchanges, clearinghouses, and VCs are now "sitting at the same table." The CFTC can directly obtain the most frontline market insights and advice, preventing rulemaking from becoming detached from reality.

What Does This Mean for Web3?

The finalization of the IAC list has at least the following clear implications for the crypto industry:

1. The "Legitimization" Coronation of Prediction Markets

On the IAC list, the inclusion of Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour is particularly eye-catching.

After the prolonged tug-of-war with regulators over whether "election prediction" constitutes gambling, the CFTC's move is equivalent to recognizing prediction markets' financial status as "event contracts." More interestingly, the list also includes the presidents of DraftKings and FanDuel—this signifies that the boundaries between sports betting, financial derivatives, and on-chain prediction markets are blurring.

This shift is particularly evident in the regulation of prediction markets. In February 2026, the CFTC announced the withdrawal of the proposed "Event Contracts" rule released in 2024. At that time, CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig stated bluntly: "The 2024 event contract-related proposal reflected the previous administration's hasty regulation seeking a comprehensive ban on political contracts ahead of the 2024 presidential election." The CFTC will advance new rulemaking based on a rational interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act that aligns with Congressional intent and promotes responsible innovation in derivatives markets.

2. DeFi and Public Chains Gain an Official "Formal Seat"

The selection of Uniswap, Solana, Chainlink, and Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman (an Ethereum promotion and product startup), among other DeFi and public chain projects or related startups, is not only recognition of DeFi's infrastructural role but also signifies that the CFTC is beginning to acknowledge, from the technical foundation, that code is market structure. Debates about "whether DeFi frontends need licenses" may shift towards the more pragmatic question of "how to make the protocol layer compliant."

3. Further Solidification of "Compliance Dividends" for Leading Platforms

The entry of institutions like Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini, which have long focused on U.S. compliance, into the core advisory layer means that future CFTC rulemaking will be more aligned with the operational logic of these platforms. The competitive advantage of compliant players will continue to grow.

These platforms, through their deep engagement with regulators, will gain significant advantages in license acquisition and business innovation. The Matthew effect in the industry will intensify further, which will also pressure smaller platforms to accelerate their compliance efforts, driving the overall compliance upgrade of the crypto industry.

Summary

The CFTC's core regulatory areas are derivatives and commodities markets. Innovative areas like crypto derivatives, digital asset futures, blockchain clearing and settlement, and prediction markets are becoming core development directions within this domain.

The establishment of the IAC represents a regulatory paradigm upgrade driven by the CFTC, shifting towards "proactive rule design in the early stages of innovation" and "adaptive regulation based on market realities."

The core of this upgrade is essentially a renewed understanding of the symbiotic relationship between regulation and innovation: financial technology innovation is not the opposite of regulation but a core driver of financial market modernization. The core role of regulation is not to hinder innovation but to define its boundaries, prevent risks, and allow innovation to realize its value within a compliant framework.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the significance of the CFTC's Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) and its new membership list?

AThe CFTC's IAC membership list signifies a major shift in U.S. regulatory approach, moving from 'passive regulation' to 'collaborative governance.' It is a key step in building a collaborative framework for regulating innovative financial markets, actively embracing crypto and fintech innovation. The committee's role is to provide expert advice on frontier innovations in derivatives and commodity markets, focusing on technologies like AI and blockchain.

QWhich major sectors and companies are represented in the CFTC's IAC membership?

AThe IAC membership is a 'all-star lineup' covering major sectors including Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) like Coinbase and Kraken, Prediction Markets like Polymarket, DeFi and public chain infrastructure like Uniswap and Solana, top crypto VCs like a16z crypto, digital asset custodians and managers like Grayscale, traditional financial and clearing institutions like Nasdaq and CME Group, and academic representatives.

QHow does the formation of the IAC impact the prediction market and DeFi sectors specifically?

AFor prediction markets, the inclusion of CEOs from Polymarket and Kalshi is seen as a legitimization, acknowledging their status as 'event contracts' and blurring the lines with sports betting and financial derivatives. For DeFi, the inclusion of projects like Uniswap and Solana represents official recognition of their infrastructure status, shifting regulatory debate from 'whether DeFi front-ends need licenses' to 'how to make the protocol layer compliant'.

QWhat are the stated core responsibilities and operational details of the IAC?

AThe IAC's core responsibility is to provide professional advice on frontier innovations in derivatives and commodity markets, focusing on how technologies like AI and blockchain are restructuring markets, and to help formulate 'adaptive rules' to maintain effective financial regulation. It operates with support from the CFTC at an annual cost of about $170,000, members serve without pay, and it is required to meet at least once a year, with subcommittees meeting as needed.

QWhat broader shift in regulatory philosophy does the establishment of the IAC represent according to the article?

AThe establishment of the IAC represents a paradigm shift in regulatory philosophy towards 'proactive rule design in the early stages of innovation' and 'adaptive regulation based on market reality.' It reflects a renewed understanding that financial innovation is not the opposite of regulation but a core driver of financial market modernization, and the role of regulation is to set boundaries and prevent risks, allowing innovation to create value within a compliant framework.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

A jurisdictional battle between the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the state of New Mexico over the regulation of prediction markets could set national rules for the industry. At issue is who polices platforms like Kalshi, with the CFTC asserting federal oversight and New Mexico arguing state gaming and consumer protection laws apply, especially for contracts resembling wagers on events like elections or sports. The outcome will determine if prediction markets can scale nationally under a clear federal framework or face a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory landscape. This dispute is significant for the crypto-adjacent trading community, which often engages with these speculative event markets. A clearer rulebook could boost mainstream adoption, liquidity, and integration with crypto infrastructure, while a state-led challenge could stifle growth. The case is particularly sensitive for sports-related contracts, where the line between financial markets and gambling blurs. Ultimately, this legal fight will shape whether prediction markets become a scalable national product or remain constrained by jurisdictional conflicts.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手Hace 7 hora(s)

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros