Qubic Sets April 1 Start Date For Dogecoin Attack

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-23Actualizado a 2026-03-23

Resumen

Qubic has announced it will launch its Dogecoin mining initiative on April 1, 2026, as part of a broader strategy to integrate external proof-of-work into its decentralized compute network. The project aims to use Dogecoin ASIC mining to strengthen QUBIC tokenomics by selling mined DOGE to buy and burn QUBIC, making it deflationary. The effort also serves as a real-world stress test for Qubic’s Oracle Machines, which validate mining shares through a Byzantine fault-tolerant system. This follows Qubic’s earlier controversial campaign against Monero, which was later reassessed as a 34% attack rather than a 51% takeover. Unlike the Monero operation, Dogecoin mining will run concurrently with Qubic’s AI training workloads, without displacing them.

Qubic says it will begin its Dogecoin push on April 1, marking the next phase of a mining strategy that first drew attention through its campaign against Monero. The big question is whether Qubic can turn Dogecoin mining into a live demonstration of its broader thesis: that external proof-of-work can be absorbed into a decentralized compute network and used to strengthen Qubic’s own token economics.

In a series of posts over the weekend, Qubic framed the rollout as both a product launch and a stress test. “Every Dogecoin share mined through the Qubic network gets validated by Oracle Machines: independent computors spread across the network who each verify the share separately. Up to 13 oracle commits per transaction. If the result passes the quorum’s Byzantine fault tolerance threshold (agreement from 451 of 676 computors), it’s validated on-chain.”

Qubic To Launch Dogecoin Mining Offensive On April 1

The team added that Oracle Machines went live on mainnet on February 11 and described Dogecoin mining as “the first real-world external use case built on top of this system.” Those claims line up with Qubic’s March technical updates, which said Dogecoin mining is on track for an April 1 mainnet launch and positioned it as a real-world stress test for the network’s outsourced-computing stack.

Dogecoin ASICs will be able to mine Qubic and receive higher rewards, while mined DOGE will be sold to buy QUBIC on the open market. Part of that purchased supply, it said, would be recycled into mining incentives, while “the rest will be burned,” with the explicit goal of making QUBIC deflationary. Qubic’s official Dogecoin mining explainer similarly says the community is still finalizing how mining revenue will be split between ASIC miners, computors, and broader network incentives.

That makes the April 1 launch more than a simple mining integration. Qubic has been arguing for months that Dogecoin changes its operating model because ASIC-based Scrypt mining can run in parallel with the network’s CPU- and GPU-based AI training, rather than alternating between workloads as it previously did with Monero.

“ASIC miners handle Dogecoin. CPUs and GPUs continue training Aigarth. Both contribute to the network. Neither displaces the other,” Qubic wrote in its March 3 explainer. “The same validation framework can serve price feeds, cross-chain data, and any external information that smart contracts need to act on.”

The backdrop is Qubic’s much more controversial Monero campaign. In August 2025, the project published a post titled “Qubic Performs 51% Monero Network Takeover Demonstration,” claiming it had reached majority hashrate and reorganized the chain. But that version did not hold up cleanly under later scrutiny.

Later independent analyses placed Qubic’s effective share closer to 28% to 35%. Even Sergey Ivancheglo ultimately conceded the operation “should be rebranded into ‘34% attack,’” a nod to the fact that the maneuver looked more like selfish mining than outright majority control.

Dogecoin was not a sudden pivot. By mid-August 2025, after the Monero episode, Qubic’s community had already chosen Dogecoin as its next target for “the following mining season,” with Ivancheglo indicating the transition would take months of development. Qubic’s January and March 2026 updates show that timeline now converging on launch: planning began in January, testing advanced through March, and the dispatcher is already live for test tasks.

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09.

DOGE hovers above key support area, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the start date for Qubic's Dogecoin mining initiative and what is the broader goal of this strategy?

AQubic will begin its Dogecoin push on April 1. The broader goal is to demonstrate that external proof-of-work can be absorbed into a decentralized compute network to strengthen Qubic's own token economics.

QHow does the Qubic network validate Dogecoin shares, and what is the threshold for validation?

ADogecoin shares are validated by Oracle Machines, which are independent computors spread across the network. Validation requires agreement from 451 out of 676 computors to meet the Byzantine fault tolerance threshold.

QWhat will happen to the Dogecoin (DOGE) mined through the Qubic network, and how does this relate to QUBIC tokens?

AMined DOGE will be sold to buy QUBIC on the open market. Part of the purchased QUBIC will be recycled into mining incentives, and the rest will be burned to make QUBIC deflationary.

QHow does Qubic's approach to Dogecoin mining differ from its previous campaign against Monero?

AUnlike the Monero campaign, which alternated workloads, Dogecoin mining with ASICs can run in parallel with Qubic's CPU- and GPU-based AI training, allowing both to contribute without displacing each other.

QWhat was the outcome of Qubic's Monero campaign, and how did independent analyses view it?

AQubic initially claimed a 51% network takeover, but independent analyses later placed its effective hashrate share at 28% to 35%, leading to it being rebranded as a '34% attack' rather than a majority control.

Lecturas Relacionadas

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHace 1 hora(s)

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片