Qubic Sets April 1 Start Date For Dogecoin Attack

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-23Actualizado a 2026-03-23

Resumen

Qubic has announced it will launch its Dogecoin mining initiative on April 1, 2026, as part of a broader strategy to integrate external proof-of-work into its decentralized compute network. The project aims to use Dogecoin ASIC mining to strengthen QUBIC tokenomics by selling mined DOGE to buy and burn QUBIC, making it deflationary. The effort also serves as a real-world stress test for Qubic’s Oracle Machines, which validate mining shares through a Byzantine fault-tolerant system. This follows Qubic’s earlier controversial campaign against Monero, which was later reassessed as a 34% attack rather than a 51% takeover. Unlike the Monero operation, Dogecoin mining will run concurrently with Qubic’s AI training workloads, without displacing them.

Qubic says it will begin its Dogecoin push on April 1, marking the next phase of a mining strategy that first drew attention through its campaign against Monero. The big question is whether Qubic can turn Dogecoin mining into a live demonstration of its broader thesis: that external proof-of-work can be absorbed into a decentralized compute network and used to strengthen Qubic’s own token economics.

In a series of posts over the weekend, Qubic framed the rollout as both a product launch and a stress test. “Every Dogecoin share mined through the Qubic network gets validated by Oracle Machines: independent computors spread across the network who each verify the share separately. Up to 13 oracle commits per transaction. If the result passes the quorum’s Byzantine fault tolerance threshold (agreement from 451 of 676 computors), it’s validated on-chain.”

Qubic To Launch Dogecoin Mining Offensive On April 1

The team added that Oracle Machines went live on mainnet on February 11 and described Dogecoin mining as “the first real-world external use case built on top of this system.” Those claims line up with Qubic’s March technical updates, which said Dogecoin mining is on track for an April 1 mainnet launch and positioned it as a real-world stress test for the network’s outsourced-computing stack.

Dogecoin ASICs will be able to mine Qubic and receive higher rewards, while mined DOGE will be sold to buy QUBIC on the open market. Part of that purchased supply, it said, would be recycled into mining incentives, while “the rest will be burned,” with the explicit goal of making QUBIC deflationary. Qubic’s official Dogecoin mining explainer similarly says the community is still finalizing how mining revenue will be split between ASIC miners, computors, and broader network incentives.

That makes the April 1 launch more than a simple mining integration. Qubic has been arguing for months that Dogecoin changes its operating model because ASIC-based Scrypt mining can run in parallel with the network’s CPU- and GPU-based AI training, rather than alternating between workloads as it previously did with Monero.

“ASIC miners handle Dogecoin. CPUs and GPUs continue training Aigarth. Both contribute to the network. Neither displaces the other,” Qubic wrote in its March 3 explainer. “The same validation framework can serve price feeds, cross-chain data, and any external information that smart contracts need to act on.”

The backdrop is Qubic’s much more controversial Monero campaign. In August 2025, the project published a post titled “Qubic Performs 51% Monero Network Takeover Demonstration,” claiming it had reached majority hashrate and reorganized the chain. But that version did not hold up cleanly under later scrutiny.

Later independent analyses placed Qubic’s effective share closer to 28% to 35%. Even Sergey Ivancheglo ultimately conceded the operation “should be rebranded into ‘34% attack,’” a nod to the fact that the maneuver looked more like selfish mining than outright majority control.

Dogecoin was not a sudden pivot. By mid-August 2025, after the Monero episode, Qubic’s community had already chosen Dogecoin as its next target for “the following mining season,” with Ivancheglo indicating the transition would take months of development. Qubic’s January and March 2026 updates show that timeline now converging on launch: planning began in January, testing advanced through March, and the dispatcher is already live for test tasks.

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09.

DOGE hovers above key support area, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the start date for Qubic's Dogecoin mining initiative and what is the broader goal of this strategy?

AQubic will begin its Dogecoin push on April 1. The broader goal is to demonstrate that external proof-of-work can be absorbed into a decentralized compute network to strengthen Qubic's own token economics.

QHow does the Qubic network validate Dogecoin shares, and what is the threshold for validation?

ADogecoin shares are validated by Oracle Machines, which are independent computors spread across the network. Validation requires agreement from 451 out of 676 computors to meet the Byzantine fault tolerance threshold.

QWhat will happen to the Dogecoin (DOGE) mined through the Qubic network, and how does this relate to QUBIC tokens?

AMined DOGE will be sold to buy QUBIC on the open market. Part of the purchased QUBIC will be recycled into mining incentives, and the rest will be burned to make QUBIC deflationary.

QHow does Qubic's approach to Dogecoin mining differ from its previous campaign against Monero?

AUnlike the Monero campaign, which alternated workloads, Dogecoin mining with ASICs can run in parallel with Qubic's CPU- and GPU-based AI training, allowing both to contribute without displacing each other.

QWhat was the outcome of Qubic's Monero campaign, and how did independent analyses view it?

AQubic initially claimed a 51% network takeover, but independent analyses later placed its effective hashrate share at 28% to 35%, leading to it being rebranded as a '34% attack' rather than a majority control.

Lecturas Relacionadas

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

U.S. lawmakers are attempting to advance the Clarity Act, a significant crypto market structure bill, but its path is fraught with partisan hurdles. The process has been rocky since January, when a prior bipartisan deal in the Senate Banking Committee was upended. A key compromise in May on "yield" issues allowed the bill to move forward in committee, but only with the conditional support of two Democratic senators, Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego. They emphasized that their final vote depends on reaching an agreement on ethics provisions for elected officials. Ultimately, the Senate Agriculture Committee passed its version along party lines without Democratic support. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, the demand for strong ethics language has expanded beyond Democrats. Additional controversies surround provisions related to yields (aligning some Republicans with large banks) and developer protections (opposed by enforcement agencies). Core concerns about illicit finance and consumer protection remain central to the debate. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, achieving the necessary bipartisan compromise is proving difficult. While momentum exists—including recent meetings between senators and White House officials—a reconciled bill text faces skepticism. Senator Gallego has stated that without ethics terms acceptable to Democrats, they will not provide the needed votes. The immediate goals for the crypto community in Congress are unclear: a symbolic Senate vote before the August recess, eventual passage into law by 2026, or forging a final compromise framework. The arduous, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support continues, mirroring the traditional legislative grind the industry must now navigate.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片