Qubic Reveals How Its Dogecoin Mining Launch Will Work Starting April 1

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-31Actualizado a 2026-03-31

Resumen

Qubic has detailed its transition to Dogecoin mining, set to begin on April 1, through a three-phase mainnet rollout. The move shifts Qubic from a mixed model of Monero mining and AI training to a parallel system where external ASIC miners handle Dogecoin via Scrypt algorithm, while Qubic’s own computational resources focus entirely on its AI project, Aigarth. The process uses a bridge called "Doge Connect" to link external miners to Qubic’s network, validate shares, and manage payouts. Monero mining will be phased out gradually over the transition. Miners will be paid in Cubics rather than direct DOGE, as Qubic will sell mined DOGE for stablecoins and buy back Cubics for redistribution—a mechanism expected to yield roughly 10% higher returns than standard Dogecoin mining. The system is designed to support multiple chains in the future, though Dogecoin is the initial focus.

Qubic used a March 30 AMA to lay out the mechanics behind its Dogecoin mining rollout, with core tech lead Joetom outlining a three-phase mainnet transition that begins April 1. The shift matters because it is designed to move Qubic away from its current split between Monero-linked outsourced mining and AI training into a model where both activities run at full scale in parallel.

The presentation centered on what Qubic calls its internal “Doge Connect” architecture, a bridge that links external Scrypt miners to Qubic’s network while redirecting Qubic’s own CPU and GPU resources fully toward its AI initiative, Aigarth. Joetom said the system relies on a dispatcher that connects to pools, translates mining tasks between the Dogecoin and Qubic networks, validates shares, and feeds results back through Qubic’s infrastructure.

“So how does this work? We call it internally Dodge Connect,” he said. “We bridge basically the mining power from outside ... with ASIC miners, we use the Scrypt algorithm and you can connect to any of the Qubic pools. So for you as a miner, nothing changes.”

That bridge is not limited to a single coin, at least in theory. Joetom said the task and messaging system was built generically enough that Qubic could support multiple chains or switch to other mineable assets later. For now, the focus is Dogecoin, with the longer-term goal of running Qubic’s AI research at full capacity while using outsourced mining as a revenue engine.

Qubic Starts Dogecoin Mining Transition

The rollout itself will happen in three stages, with each phase expected to last one to two weeks if testing goes as planned. Phase one begins on mainnet April 1 and is framed as a validation period, covering task distribution, solution handling, pool communications, and public statistics. During that phase, Qubic will reduce its current Monero “marathons” from three days per week to two, beginning a gradual shift away from XMR mining.

Joetom described the process as a controlled crossover rather than a hard cut. “We will reduce this starting with phase one to two days per week,” he said. “So they will basically cross each other and at the end of phase two the Monero stuff will be removed.”

By the final state, he said, the network is meant to reach “100% AI training and 100% outsourced mining.” In practice, that means Qubic’s CPUs and GPUs would be dedicated to Aigarth research, while Dogecoin mining would be handled externally by ASIC miners connected through Qubic pools.

One of the more important economic details from the AMA was the payout model. Rather than distributing DOGE directly, Qubic plans to sell outsourced mining proceeds for stablecoins, use those funds to buy back Cubics, and then redistribute Cubics to miners. Joetom called the mechanism a “buyback” system and said the team expects it to make mining through Qubic more attractive than mining Dogecoin alone.

“We assume that we will see an acceleration for the DOGE revenue,” he said. “Meaning that the Qubic revenue when you mine DOGE via Qubic you will see approximately 10% more revenue than if you would go only for doge.”

The technical path also leans heavily on Qubic’s oracle infrastructure. Shares submitted through the network are validated internally, with oracle machines acting as the source of truth for whether a mined share is accepted. That makes the integration more than a simple mining proxy; it effectively routes Dogecoin-related work through Qubic’s own validation and accounting model.

For miners, the immediate takeaway is operational rather than conceptual. Joetom said older hardware such as Antminer L3 units can still participate, even if newer machines like the L9 offer stronger economics. Public testing is expected to open April 1, with connection details to be shared through Qubic’s Discord and pool operators.

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09.

DOGE hovers above key support, 1-month chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of Qubic's Dogecoin mining rollout starting April 1?

AThe main purpose is to transition Qubic away from its current split between Monero-linked outsourced mining and AI training into a model where both activities run at full scale in parallel, dedicating Qubic's CPU and GPU resources fully to its AI initiative Aigarth while using outsourced mining for Dogecoin as a revenue engine.

QHow does Qubic's 'Doge Connect' architecture function?

ADoge Connect is a bridge that links external Scrypt miners to Qubic's network. It uses a dispatcher to connect to pools, translates mining tasks between the Dogecoin and Qubic networks, validates shares, and feeds results back through Qubic's infrastructure, allowing ASIC miners to connect to Qubic pools without changing their operations.

QWhat are the three phases of the mainnet transition and what happens in phase one?

AThe rollout will happen in three phases, each expected to last one to two weeks. Phase one begins on mainnet April 1 and is a validation period covering task distribution, solution handling, pool communications, and public statistics. During this phase, Qubic will reduce its current Monero 'marathons' from three days per week to two.

QHow will Qubic handle payouts for Dogecoin miners using its system?

ARather than distributing DOGE directly, Qubic plans to sell the outsourced mining proceeds for stablecoins, use those funds to buy back Cubics (Qubic's native token), and then redistribute Cubics to the miners. This 'buyback' system is expected to provide approximately 10% more revenue than mining Dogecoin alone.

QWhat role does Qubic's oracle infrastructure play in the new mining system?

AQubic's oracle machines act as the source of truth for validating whether a mined share is accepted. Shares submitted through the network are validated internally, making the integration more than a simple mining proxy by effectively routing Dogecoin-related work through Qubic's own validation and accounting model.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Hace 22 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Hace 22 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片