QNT jumps 12% as volume triples — Can Quant bulls defend THIS floor?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-18Actualizado a 2026-01-18

Resumen

Quant (QNT) surged 12.33% over 36 hours, with its daily trading volume tripling. The rally occurred as Bitcoin defended a key support level near $94.5k, potentially opening upward momentum toward $100k and creating room for altcoin gains. On the weekly chart, QNT maintains a bullish structure, having set a higher low at $58.60 in 2025 and defended the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75 since November. The recent 8% weekly gain suggests a possible long-term reversal. However, risks remain due to Bitcoin’s bearish weekly structure and key resistance zones at $101k and $108k. Traders may consider long positions given QNT’s bullish 4-hour structure and negative exchange netflow indicating accumulation. Key invalidation level is a close below $72.5, with profit targets at $90 and $110. Long-term holders should remain cautious due to potential Bitcoin-driven downside and neutral-to-fearful market sentiment. Overall, the rebound from a major Fibonacci level is encouraging, but the broader market outlook suggests elevated risk for QNT investors.

Quant [QNT] has rallied 12.33% in the past 36 hours, and its daily trading volume has tripled since Friday, the 16th of January. The strong gains and high volume came while BTC defended the $94.5k local support zone, which had been a resistance in December and until recently.

Bitcoin has scope for advancing toward $100k, which gives altcoins some room to make gains.

The long-term trend of QNT is bullish

The weekly chart showed that Quant [QNT] has a bullish structure on the weekly. The rally in November 2024 broke the previous high at $149.6. In 2025, the weekly chart showed QNT set a higher low at $58.60.

In recent months, it has retraced to the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75. The bulls have defended this support zone well since November.

The past week saw an 8.03% move higher for QNT, which could be an early sign of a long-term reversal.

The end of the retracement phase for Quant will give investors an opportunity, but it comes with risks. Bitcoin [BTC] itself has a bearish weekly structure, and the $101k and $108k were supply zones that could reject BTC bulls.

The bearish case for Quant investors

Long-term holders should be wary of the risks of a deeper price drop due to Bitcoin movements and the wider market sentiment, which was neutral to fearful at the time of writing. The timing of a long-term purchase was not ideal.

Traders’ call to action- Potential for a trade setup

The 4-hour structure was bullish, and there is reason for traders to go long. Capital rotation into altcoins is a possibility in the coming weeks, and Quant holders could make profits.

A 4-hour session close below $72.5 would invalidate this idea. The $90 and $110 were the sizeable supply zones overhead that bulls can look to take profits at.

QNT Exchange Netflow was negative over the past three days, indicative of accumulation.


Final Thoughts

  • The Quant rebound from the key long-term Fibonacci retracement level was an encouraging sign.
  • The longer-term Bitcoin and altcoin market outlook showed that QNT investors could be taking a risky step.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the recent price performance of Quant (QNT) and its trading volume?

AQuant (QNT) has rallied 12.33% in the past 36 hours, and its daily trading volume has tripled since Friday, January 16th.

QWhat key support level have the QNT bulls been defending on the weekly chart?

AThe bulls have been defending the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75, which has acted as a key support zone since November.

QWhat is the primary risk for long-term QNT investors mentioned in the article?

AThe primary risk is the potential for a deeper price drop due to Bitcoin's movements and the wider market sentiment, which was described as neutral to fearful.

QWhat price level on the 4-hour chart would invalidate the bullish trading idea presented?

AA 4-hour session close below $72.5 would invalidate the bullish trading idea.

QWhat does the negative QNT Exchange Netflow over the past three days indicate?

AThe negative Netflow is indicative of accumulation, meaning more tokens are being withdrawn from exchanges than deposited.

Lecturas Relacionadas

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片