Pump.fun (PUMP) Momentum Fades: Is Another Leg Down Imminent?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-26Actualizado a 2026-03-26

Resumen

Pump.fun (PUMP) has declined by over 5.63% in the past 24 hours, with its price dropping to around $0.00178. Despite a 16.98% increase in trading volume to $95.67 million, the market cap stands at $587.57 million, and liquidations have reached $403.30K. Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend: the MACD is below zero, indicating downward momentum, while the RSI at 41.03 shows a slight bearish bias. The Chaikin Money Flow is nearly neutral, and Bull-Bear Power suggests a lack of strong directional momentum. If bearish pressure continues, PUMP could test the $0.0016 support level. A bullish reversal would require breaking the $0.0018 resistance.

As of 26th March, Pump.fun (PUMP) is waving a red flag across the chart, registering a loss of over 5.63% in the last 24 hours. The asset opened the day trading at around $0.001922, and with the bearish pressure in the PUMP market, the price has retraced to a bottom range of $0.00177.

Currently, the Pump.fun price is trading at around the $0.001780 mark, with the market cap reaching $587.57 million. Besides, the daily trading volume is up by over 16.98%, touching $95.67 million. The Coinglass data has reported that the PUMP market has seen a 24-hour liquidation worth $403.30K.

With the negative sentiment of Pump.fun, the price might slip to test the $0.0016 level. Assuming a sturdy downside correction to happen, the death cross could emerge, and the bears would send the price even lower to its former supports.

If the bulls entered the PUMP market, the price could immediately rise to the resistance at around $0.0018. An extended pressure on the upside might initiate the golden cross to take place, and drive the asset’s price to its higher targets.

Which Direction Will PUMP’s Momentum Take Next?

Pump.fun’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and signal lines are below the zero line, which means the momentum is clearly in the downtrend. The price has been moving lower, and the market is heavy, so any bounce may struggle unless momentum starts to shift.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator of PUMP at 0.01 is almost neutral, with a slight bullish tilt. Money is flowing into the asset, but it is very weak. Notably, the buyers are just starting to step in, and this points to a sideways market, unless stronger inflows begin to build.

The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 41.03 indicates a slight bearish bias. Sellers have a small edge, and the price has been leaning lower, but the momentum is not strong. Also, there is still room to move either way, but for now, the Pump.fun market leans a bit weak.

Moreover, the Bull-Bear Power (BBP) reading of PUMP at -0.000095 is in the neutral phase. It has no dominance from either buyers or sellers, and the market is undecided, with very mild momentum. This points to sideways movement, unless a stronger push starts to build.

Top Updated Crypto News

MUBARAK Takes a Hit: Will the Sell-Off Continue?

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price of Pump.fun (PUMP) and how much has it lost in the last 24 hours?

AThe current price of Pump.fun (PUMP) is approximately $0.001780, and it has lost over 5.63% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the significance of the MACD and signal lines being below the zero line for PUMP?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and signal lines being below the zero line indicates that the momentum for PUMP is clearly in a downtrend.

QAccording to the RSI, what is the current market bias for Pump.fun?

AThe daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 41.03 indicates a slight bearish bias, meaning sellers have a small edge.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator suggest about money flow into the PUMP asset?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator for PUMP is at 0.01, which is almost neutral with a very slight bullish tilt, indicating that money is flowing into the asset but very weakly.

QWhat is the next major support level that the Pump.fun price might test if the negative sentiment continues?

AIf the negative sentiment continues, the Pump.fun price might slip to test the $0.0016 support level.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

NVIDIA's Rubin Ultra, the top-tier variant of the newly announced Rubin AI accelerators, has reportedly seen significant specification downgrades, according to an industry report from SemiAnalysis. Initially designed with four compute dies (4-die), the Rubin Ultra is now said to be reduced to a 2-die design. Key changes highlighted in the report include: * **No increase in peak theoretical compute performance**, remaining at 35 PFLOPs like the standard Rubin. * **Severe reduction in memory capacity** to 192GB using 8-Hi HBM stacks, which is less than the standard Rubin's 288GB using 12-Hi stacks. * **Negligible memory bandwidth improvement** of only 1 TB/s. * **Slightly higher chip-level power consumption**. * The **primary upgrade is a massive increase in scale-up interconnect capacity**, supporting connections for up to 576 GPUs via NVLink, compared to 72 for the standard Rubin. The report suggests the redesign is primarily a cost-optimization move driven by the sharp rise in HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) prices. By reducing the expensive HBM content and shifting investment towards enhanced system-scale networking, NVIDIA aims to maintain the platform's value for large-scale AI training clusters while managing soaring material costs. The news reportedly triggered a sell-off in South Korean memory stocks, with SK Hynix and Samsung shares falling around 8%, as markets grew concerned that NVIDIA—a major HBM buyer—might be reducing its reliance on high-capacity memory, potentially capping future pricing power for memory makers.

Odaily星球日报Hace 12 min(s)

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

Odaily星球日报Hace 12 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar PUMP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Pump.fun (PUMP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Pump.fun (PUMP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Pump.fun (PUMP)Después de comprar tu Pump.fun (PUMP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Pump.fun (PUMP)Tradear fácilmente con Pump.fun (PUMP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

313 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.07.09

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de PUMP (PUMP).