Profits Fall by a Quarter: Why Tether Abandoned Its $20 Billion Financing Plan

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-05Actualizado a 2026-02-05

Resumen

In the face of a cooling crypto market and investor skepticism, Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, has significantly scaled back its ambitious fundraising plans. Initially targeting $15-20 billion, which would have valued the company at $500 billion, the firm is now considering raising only about $5 billion. CEO Paolo Ardoino downplayed the original target, calling it a "misunderstanding" and a maximum cap, not a goal, while emphasizing that Tether is highly profitable and doesn't urgently need the capital. Despite the success of its USDT stablecoin, which has a market cap of approximately $185 billion, Tether faces persistent investor caution. Concerns revolve around its $500 billion valuation—comparable to major AI firms and SpaceX—ongoing regulatory scrutiny, and the lack of a full independent audit, relying instead on quarterly attestations. Ardoino defended the valuation, contrasting Tether's substantial profits with the losses of highly-valued AI companies. While new U.S. stablecoin legislation and competitor Circle's IPO have boosted momentum, regulatory risks and Tether's controversial history remain hurdles. The company's profits fell by about a quarter in 2025, attributed to declining Bitcoin prices, though it gained $8-10 billion from its gold holdings. Tether's massive scale has made it a major player in U.S. Treasuries and gold markets, positioning it as a critical bridge between traditional finance and the volatile crypto world.

Editor's Note: Against the backdrop of a cooling crypto market and pressured valuation narratives, Tether finds itself in a delicate position. On one hand, the continued expansion of USDT has made it an undeniable 'new financial player' in the U.S. Treasury and gold markets. On the other hand, a lofty $500 billion valuation expectations, an incomplete comprehensive audit, and long-standing regulatory and compliance controversies continue to make potential investors cautious.

Tether's next move may reflect not only its own choices but also the practical boundaries the entire stablecoin industry is facing.

The following is the original text:

As investors expressed skepticism about its $500 billion valuation target, the CEO of Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, proactively downplayed expectations and attention regarding its financing scale.

This crypto group, registered in El Salvador, initiated financing negotiations last year, planning to raise $15 to $20 billion. Had the deal been completed, it would have placed Tether among the world's most valuable private companies.

But according to informed sources, after encountering investor hesitation, Tether's advisors have begun exploring the possibility of raising only about $5 billion.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino downplayed the potential financing scale, calling the previously stated $15 to $20 billion target "a misunderstanding."

"That number was not our target; it was just the maximum we were willing to sell," he said in an interview. "We would be equally happy not selling a single cent."

Ardoino stated that Tether is highly profitable and has received "significant interest" at the $500 billion valuation level. He added that the company has not yet decided how much equity to sell, partly because insiders are reluctant to reduce their holdings.

The company's dollar-pegged stablecoin, USDT, currently has a scale of approximately $1.85 trillion and is regarded as the "reserve currency" of the digital asset market. Control of Tether is concentrated in the hands of a small group of long-serving executives.

The market has been closely watching Tether's progress in attracting well-known investors, seeing it as a key indicator of investor interest in the crypto industry. It is widely believed that this move is more about consolidating Tether's credibility and network, as the company, generating billions of dollars in profit annually, does not urgently need new capital.

Following Trump's election as president, the market was once boosted by expectations of a more friendly U.S. regulatory environment for digital assets. However, over the past six months, as traders retreated from high-risk speculative assets, the crypto market has seen a significant pullback.

Some investors have privately expressed concerns about the $500 billion valuation, which would place Tether among the top private companies globally, alongside AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, as well as Musk's SpaceX and TikTok's parent company ByteDance.

Ardoino argued that Tether—which disclosed profits of approximately $10 billion last year, primarily from returns on the asset reserves backing USDT's value—deserves a valuation comparable to these still-unprofitable AI model companies.

"These AI companies make about the same amount of money as we do, just with a huge minus sign in front," he said. "If you're willing to believe an AI company with a massive minus sign in front is worth $800 billion, that's your choice."

Both Tether and its financing advisor, Cantor Fitzgerald, declined to comment on the size of this financing. The investment bank, run by the children of U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, also holds a stake in Tether.

Informed sources cautioned that the negotiations are ongoing and the financing terms could still change; if the overall crypto market strengthens again, investor sentiment could also reverse.

Ardoino stated that the new U.S. stablecoin legislation signed into law by Trump, coupled with the listing of U.S. rival Circle last year, has further increased market attention and momentum for Tether. Tether recently also launched a new token in the U.S. that complies with this regulatory framework.

But informed sources said some potential investors remain cautious about the regulatory risks surrounding Tether. Since its founding in 2014, this crypto group has long faced scrutiny, with controversies primarily focusing on whether its tokens are used for illegal activities and the transparency and quality of its asset reserves.

In recent years, Tether has begun publishing quarterly reserve attestations by the accounting firm BDO Italia, but it has never undergone a full independent audit.

Ardoino stated that the company has demonstrated the depth of its technical tools for collaboration with various law enforcement agencies to potential investors, to prove its capabilities in compliance and law enforcement cooperation.

S&P Global Ratings downgraded Tether's reserve rating to the lowest tier in its system late last year, citing its increasing exposure to high-risk assets like Bitcoin and gold. In response, Ardoino said at the time: "We wear your disdain as a badge of honor."

Since 2020, the growth of USDT has significantly accelerated, making Tether one of the world's largest buyers of U.S. Treasuries and, in recent months, a major player in the gold market.

Asset allocation on such a massive scale makes Tether one of the most critical connecting nodes between the global financial system and the highly volatile world of cryptocurrency.

Compared to the previous year, Tether's profits for 2025 fell by about a quarter. Ardoino attributed this change to the decline in Bitcoin's price. He added that the company gained approximately $8 to $10 billion in profits from its gold holdings, benefiting from rising precious metal prices.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Tether significantly scale back its fundraising target from up to $20 billion to potentially only $5 billion?

ATether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino, stated that the initial $15-20 billion figure was a 'misunderstanding' and represented the maximum they were *willing* to sell, not a target. Investor hesitation over the company's $500 billion valuation and internal shareholders' reluctance to sell their stakes contributed to the reduced scale.

QWhat was the primary reason for Tether's 25% profit decline in 2025, according to its CEO?

APaolo Ardoino attributed the approximately 25% profit decline in 2025 primarily to a decrease in the price of Bitcoin.

QWhat are the main regulatory and transparency concerns that make some potential investors cautious about Tether?

APotential investors are cautious due to Tether's long history of scrutiny over whether its tokens are used for illicit activity, the transparency and quality of its asset reserves, and the fact that it has not undergone a full independent audit, relying instead on quarterly attestations from BDO Italia.

QHow does Tether's CEO justify the company's proposed $500 billion valuation compared to major AI companies?

APaolo Ardoino argues that Tether, which is highly profitable, deserves a valuation comparable to major AI companies that are still reporting losses, stating, 'These AI companies make about the same money as us, just with a big minus sign in front.'

QWhat two major roles does Tether now play in the broader financial system, according to the article?

ATether has become one of the world's largest buyers of U.S. Treasury bonds and a significant participant in the gold market. This makes it a critical connecting node between the global financial system and the highly volatile world of cryptocurrencies.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片