Profit Drops for LIT Whale After Closing Long Position

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-05Actualizado a 2026-01-05

Resumen

A whale wallet recently closed a long position on LIT, incurring a loss of $767,403. This caused its overall profit to drop significantly from $3 million to $420k. The closure occurred despite LIT's recent price increase, currently trading at $2.72 with a 6.73% surge in the last 24 hours. Although LIT reached an all-time high of $4.04 on December 30, 2025, it has since declined by 32.63%. Forecasts for early 2026 predict a price correction, with LIT dropping to around $2.17 in the next month before rebounding to $2.21 in three months. Despite short-term bearish predictions, long-term sentiment remains bullish, with expectations for LIT to reach $5.31 by the end of 2026.

A whale wallet recently closed their long position on LIT, but faced significant loss in the process. Overall profit has dropped as well. The development notably comes at a time when Lighter tokens are marking upticks in their values and recorded an ATH a few days ago.

Whale Faces Loss Closing LIT Position

A whale wallet reportedly recorded a loss of $767,403 after closing the long position on LIT. Acquired at a 1x leverage, the 1.6-year dormant wallet has also recorded a drop in profit from $3 million to $420k.

The development within a week from increasing the long position in the token. The position was valued at around $3.59 million with a floating loss of more than $1.26 million. Simultaneously, the whale wallet was able to close a short position in ASTER with a profit of $537k before that transaction.

LIT Price Rally

Anticipations around LIT price rally gained momentum when another whale wallet deposited USDC to expand LIT holdings. Lighter tokens were trading at $2.69 at that time, but are now up to $2.72 with a surge of 6.73% over the last 24 hours. It further represents a jump of 2.3% in the last 7 days.

LIT recorded an ATL of $2.30 on December 30, 2025, and is now up by 18.47% from that value. It noted an ATH of $4.04 on the same date, but has now declined by 32.63%. Interestingly, LIT has 1 billion in total supply but has only 250 million in circulation.

LIT in 2026

The early 3 months of 2026 are forecasted to see a price correction for LIT. The token could go as low as $2.17 in the next 1 month and rebound to $2.21 as it completes the 3-month cycle from this point. The 1 month decline comes to around 20.89% from the current value. Similarly, the 3-month plunge comes to approximately 19.45%.

Its support and resistance margins are yet to be defined, but overall sentiments remain bullish with the neutral 14-Day RSI of 38 points and the FGI of 26 points. The trajectory drawn to this point, based on market conditions, expects LIT to start reclaiming its highs from September 2026. A walk on the chart could pave the way to $5.31 by the end of 2026.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Japan Finance Minister Backs Integration of Digital Assets Into TradFi

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the amount of loss the whale faced after closing their long position on LIT?

AThe whale faced a loss of $767,403 after closing their long position on LIT.

QHow much did the whale's overall profit drop after closing the LIT position?

AThe whale's overall profit dropped from $3 million to $420,000.

QWhat was the All-Time High (ATH) price of LIT and how much has it declined from that value?

AThe All-Time High (ATH) price of LIT was $4.04, and it has now declined by 32.63% from that value.

QWhat is the forecasted price range for LIT over the next 3 months according to the article?

AThe article forecasts that LIT could drop to as low as $2.17 in the next month and rebound to $2.21 by the 3-month mark.

QWhat is the long-term price target for LIT by the end of 2026, as mentioned in the article?

AThe long-term price target for LIT by the end of 2026 is $5.31.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ripple’s RLUSD Lands In Mastercard’s Stablecoin Settlement Expansion

Mastercard is expanding its stablecoin settlement capabilities, adding Ripple's RLUSD alongside other regulated stablecoins like USDC and PYUSD. This move allows issuers and acquirers to settle card transactions using digital assets on various blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and the XRP Ledger. The enhancement introduces intraday, weekend, and holiday settlement options, aiming to provide more flexibility, especially for cross-border payments and treasury operations. Mastercard positions this as a network-level addition that complements existing processes, with initial support focused on the US and Latin America. Ripple views RLUSD's inclusion as validation for regulated stablecoins in institutional payment infrastructure, highlighting the growing demand for faster, always-on settlement.

bitcoinistHace 19 min(s)

Ripple’s RLUSD Lands In Mastercard’s Stablecoin Settlement Expansion

bitcoinistHace 19 min(s)

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

From Web3 to AI Agent: Veteran Crypto VC Variant Bets $300 Million on Pivot

Variant Fund has announced the launch of Variant 4, a new $222 million early-stage venture fund. Its investment thesis has evolved from "digital ownership" to a broader theme of "sovereignty," focusing on technologies that enhance user agency—the control individuals have over their lives, assets, and identity. The firm distinguishes between mere automation and systems that genuinely empower users, emphasizing that the key question is who ultimately benefits: the user or the platform. This new framework encompasses Variant's existing investments in areas like public blockchains (Ethereum, Solana), developer infrastructure, decentralized finance (e.g., Uniswap), and consumer applications. It also informs recent early bets on projects such as Honcho (for self-custodial AI agent memory), Octet (cryptographic verification of physical location), and here.now (an "agent cloud" for owning and composing generative content). Variant's core mission remains to back founders building technologies that expand user sovereignty, moving towards an internet where users possess unprecedented agency rather than being the product.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

From Web3 to AI Agent: Veteran Crypto VC Variant Bets $300 Million on Pivot

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Solana Explosive Growth Pushes Its Monthly Perps Volume Beyond Prior Records

Despite bearish market conditions and price volatility, Solana is demonstrating significant strength in its derivatives market. The network's monthly perpetual futures volume has surged to a new record, exceeding $76.7 billion in May 2026—a 34% increase from the previous high. This growth reflects heightened speculative activity and trader engagement. Analysts note that perpetual contracts are becoming crucial financial primitives, with Solana positioning itself as a network for genuine on-chain price discovery and execution. Concurrently, Solana is experiencing a massive increase in stablecoin activity, processing over $79.9 billion in stablecoin volume in one week, underscoring its role as a major hub for on-chain liquidity and transactions.

bitcoinistHace 50 min(s)

Solana Explosive Growth Pushes Its Monthly Perps Volume Beyond Prior Records

bitcoinistHace 50 min(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros