Primitive Ventures: The Crypto World Feels a Bit Dead

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-13Actualizado a 2026-01-13

Resumen

Primitive Ventures' Dovey Wan argues that despite Bitcoin hitting new all-time highs in 2025, the crypto market feels stagnant and disconnected. Key issues include a lack of altcoin momentum, underperformance against traditional assets like stocks and gold, and a significant divergence between onshore (U.S.) buying and offshore selling. U.S. investors bought spot Bitcoin, while international traders sold into strength and used leverage. Structural shifts, including Bitcoin ETFs and institutional products, changed liquidity dynamics. Retail interest declined, and miners sold Bitcoin to fund AI ventures. Major sell pressure came from early whales, miners, and gray market entities. The traditional 4-year cycle is broken; future performance depends on macro conditions and institutional adoption. Crypto must evolve from speculative asset to utility-driven technology to attract new cycles of investment.

Author: Dovey Wan, Founding Partner of Primitive Ventures

Compiled by: Dayu

In 2025, the cryptocurrency industry achieved almost all its expected goals. Structurally, this should have been a glorious year.

But why does it feel... so lifeless?

It's not just that "prices didn't rise" and it's all over. Bitcoin hit new highs. But the atmosphere, sentiment, internal confirmation, follow-through from other cryptocurrencies, and retail enthusiasm have all changed. Perhaps most worryingly, the former "hot money leading asset" has now lost its appeal in terms of wealth effect and volatility.

Related cryptocurrency assets no longer move in sync with Bitcoin and Ethereum as they did in previous cycles:

1. Memecoins topped the charts from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025, and the launch of Trump tokens pushed this trend to its peak.

2. Crypto stocks peaked around the Circle IPO and began to fall back between May and August 2025.

3. Most altcoins never formed a sustained trend. There was asymmetry on the way up, and the decline was entirely dominated by all participants.

Zooming in, the situation becomes even stranger.

Despite a friendly policy environment, Bitcoin's performance in 2025 lagged behind almost all major traditional financial assets, including gold, U.S. stocks, Hong Kong stocks, A-shares, and even some bond benchmark indices.

(Bitcoin's performance compared poorly to other assets)

This is the first time Bitcoin's performance has decoupled from all other asset classes.

This divergence is crucial: prices hit new highs, but there was no internal confirmation, and other markets performed better. This reveals a simple yet unsettling fact: Bitcoin's liquidity supply chain has undergone significant changes, and its original four-year settlement cycle has been altered by greater forces in other markets.

Therefore, we will delve into who was buying at the highs, who exited the market, and where the price bottom lies.

The Great Divide: Onshore vs. Offshore Operations

We experienced three distinct phases in this cycle—

Phase A (November 2024 to January 2025): Trump's election victory and a more friendly regulatory environment triggered FOMO among both domestic and foreign investors. Bitcoin's price broke through $100,000 for the first time.
Phase B (April to mid-August 2025): After deleveraging selling, BTC resumed its upward momentum and broke through $120,000.
Phase C (Early October 2025): BTC hit its current local all-time high in early October, then experienced a flash crash on October 10th and entered a correction phase.

In each phase, we saw a significant divergence between U.S. buying and overseas selling—

Spot: Onshore buying on breakouts, offshore selling on strength.

Coinbase Premium remained positive in Phases A, B, and C. High levels of buy-side demand primarily came from onshore spot funds.
Coinbase BTC balances showed a declining trend throughout the cycle. Sellable inventory on the U.S. side decreased.
As prices rebounded in Phases B and C, Binance balances increased significantly. Offshore spot holders replenished inventory, increasing potential selling pressure.

Futures: Offshore leverage rises, onshore positions decline

Offshore open interest (Binance and other offshore exchanges) climbed during Phases B and C. Leverage increased. Even after October 10th, leverage quickly recovered and returned to or exceeded previous peaks.

Onshore open interest (CME) has been on a downward trend since early 2025. Institutional investors did not increase their risk exposure as contracts hit new highs.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin volatility diverged from price action.

In August 2025, when Bitcoin's price first surpassed $120,000, DVOL was near a local low. The options market did not adequately compensate for continued risk.

Each "top" seemed to reflect a divergence between onshore and offshore traders. When onshore spot funds pushed prices to break out, offshore spot traders sold into strength. When offshore leveraged capital chased the rally, onshore futures and options traders reduced positions and stayed on the sidelines.

Where are the marginal buyers? Who is left to buy?

Glassnode estimates that the number of Bitcoins held by corporate and DAT-like tools increased from about 197,000 in early 2023 to about 1.08 million by the end of 2025, a net increase of about 890,000 over two years. DATs have become one of the largest structural investment vehicles in the Bitcoin system.

Another often misunderstood area is ETFs. By the end of 2025, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs held approximately 1.36 million, a year-on-year increase of about 23%, accounting for about 6.8% of the circulating supply.

Institutional investors (13F filers) hold less than a quarter of the total ETF amount, and most of these are hedge funds and investment advisors, clearly not the "diamond hand" families we know.

The Death of Retail

Since early 2025, flow data from Binance, Coinbase, and other top exchanges clearly shows that retail investor weakness has continued since Trump sold his "memecoins".

Furthermore, overall social sentiment among retail investors has actually been bearish since early 2024.

Overall website traffic has been on a downward trend since peaking in 2021.

Bitcoin's price hitting new highs did not bring traffic back to previous levels.

You can read more on this topic in our article from last year. "Who is the marginal buyer?"

Exchange strategies have also adjusted. Facing high customer acquisition costs and low activity from existing users, exchanges have shifted from "striving for growth" to "retaining existing capital through yield products and multi-asset trading (actively listing U.S. stocks, gold, and forex)".

Everywhere Else, It's a Bull Market

The real "wealth effect" in 2025 was not in crypto: the S&P 500 (+18%), Nasdaq (+22%), Nikkei (+27%), Hang Seng Index (+30%), KOSPI (+75%), and even A-shares rose 19%, all posting strong gains. Gold (+70%) and silver (+144%) also surged, making "digital gold" seem somewhat ridiculous by comparison.

AI stocks, 0DTE (zero-day to expiration) options, and commodities like gold and silver further eroded its appeal.

Speculative money did not rotate into alternative investments. Many exited altogether, returning to equity volatility markets, while new speculators happily profited in U.S. stocks or their domestic equity markets.

Even Korean retail investors sold off Upbit to bet on the KOSPI index and U.S. stocks: Upbit's average daily trading volume in 2025 fell about 80% compared to 2024. During the same period, the KOSPI rose over 75%. Korean retail investors net bought about $31 billion in U.S. stocks.

Who Are the Biggest Sellers?

Every cycle has whales selling at local highs, but interestingly, the timing of seller distribution this cycle coincided perfectly with the RSI divergence points.

Bitcoin had previously moved closely in line with U.S. tech stocks until around August 2025, when Bitcoin began to significantly lag ARKK and Nvidia, followed by the October 10th flash crash, and it has yet to close the gap since.

Just before this divergence appeared, in late July, Galaxy disclosed in its earnings report and media briefings that it had executed a sell order of over 80,000 Bitcoins on behalf of an established holder. This transaction brought the phenomenon of "Satoshi-era whale profit-taking" into public view.

Miners Selling for AI Capex

From the 2024 Bitcoin halving to the end of 2025, miner reserves experienced their most sustained decline since 2021. By year-end, reserves were around 1.806 million Bitcoins. Hash rate fell about 15% year-on-year.

Under the "AI Diversion Plan," miners transferred approximately $5.6 billion worth of Bitcoin to exchanges to fund the construction of AI data centers.
Bitfarms, Hut 8, Cipher, Iren, and others are converting sites into AI and high-performance computing campuses, signing 10 to 15-year compute contracts, treating power and land as "gold in the AI era."
Riot, a representative HODLer, announced in April 2025 that it would begin selling all coins mined monthly.

It is estimated that by the end of 2027, about 20% of mining power capacity could be redeployed to AI workloads.

China took more severe measures. In December 2025, Xinjiang again became a target for the People's Bank of China and various ministries. About 400,000 ASIC miners were forced offline, causing global hash rate to drop 8% to 10% in a few days.

Gray Whales: Bitcoin's Black Hangover

Similar to the significant impact of the PlusToken scam in the 2021 cycle, several large-scale fraud and gambling cases in 2025, including Qian Zhimin's Ponzi scheme/cult network and the Cambodia Prince Group/Chen Zhi case, were likely major behind-the-scenes drivers of Bitcoin's price action.

Both cases involved the seizure of tens of thousands of Bitcoins, totaling at or above the level of 100,000 black coins.

This may also add potential selling pressure from governments, while significantly inhibiting large gray market long-term holders of Bitcoin, which could create selling pressure in the medium term but is overall positive in the long run.

2026 Outlook

Under this new structure, the original "four-year halving cycle" is no longer a feasible self-fulfilling path.

The next phase of the regime is primarily driven by two axes.

Vertical: Macro liquidity and credit conditions, interest rates, fiscal stance, AI investment cycle.
Horizontal: Valuation and premium levels of DATs, ETFs, and other Bitcoin alternative assets.

Early Bitcoin winners, including OGs, miners, and Asian gray whales, are distributing tokens to passive ETF holders, DAT structures, and long-term national capital.

Bitcoin's trajectory seems similar to that of FAANG between 2013 and 2020: the market is slowly shifting from a high-beta strategy dominated by early retail and growth funds to a passive allocation strategy dominated by index funds, pension funds, and sovereign wealth funds.

Bitcoin is now the crypto asset you can own easily without touching crypto. You can buy it through a brokerage account, custody it like an ETF, account for it clearly, and explain it to a trader investment committee in five sentences.

Whereas the valuation of most other crypto assets does not stem from their actual utility or legitimacy in the physical market and Wall Street.

We always look forward to the next bull market, but it would be great if this bull market wasn't just about price increases, but also about utility increases, translating the legitimacy of the ETF era into on-chain demand, converting passive holding into active use, and bringing real yield returns, not just constantly shifting narratives.

If that happens, today's "bag holders" won't look like fools trapped at the cycle's peak, but rather like the first investors of the new cycle.

Bitcoin finally becomes national reserve currency

Code is eating the bank

Crypto still needs to evolve into a new tool of civilization.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why does the crypto world feel 'dead' despite Bitcoin hitting new highs in 2025?

AThe article states that while Bitcoin hit new highs, the atmosphere, sentiment, internal confirmation, follow-through from other cryptocurrencies, and retail enthusiasm have all changed. It points to a lack of wealth effect and volatility appeal, poor performance compared to other asset classes, and a significant shift in Bitcoin's liquidity supply chain and its traditional four-year cycle.

QWhat key divergence does the article highlight between onshore (US) and offshore trading activity for Bitcoin?

AThe article highlights a major divergence where onshore (US) spot buyers were the primary demand driving breakouts, while offshore spot holders sold into strength. Conversely, offshore futures leverage increased during rallies, while onshore futures and options traders reduced their positions and remained on the sidelines.

QWho does the article identify as the largest structural investment vehicle in the Bitcoin system by the end of 2025?

AThe article identifies DATs (Digital Asset Trusts, likely referring to products like Grayscale's GBTC) as the largest structural investment vehicle in the Bitcoin system by the end of 2025, holding an estimated 1.08 million BTC.

QWhat are the two main drivers the article proposes for Bitcoin's price trajectory in 2026, replacing the old 'four-year halving cycle'?

AThe article proposes that Bitcoin's trajectory in 2026 will be driven by two main axes: 1) The vertical axis: macro liquidity and credit conditions, interest rates, fiscal stance, and the AI investment cycle. 2) The horizontal axis: the valuation and premium levels of DATs, ETFs, and other Bitcoin proxy assets.

QBesides early whales and miners, what other significant source of selling pressure ('black whales') does the article mention?

AThe article mentions 'black whales' or 'grey whales' as a significant source of selling pressure, referring to large-scale fraud and gambling cases like the Qian Zhimin Ponzi scheme/cult network and the Cambodia Prince Group/Chen Zhi case, which involved the seizure of tens of thousands of Bitcoin, potentially adding over 100,000 black coins to the market and government selling pressure.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar WAN

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Wanchain (WAN) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Wanchain (WAN) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Wanchain (WAN)Después de comprar tu Wanchain (WAN), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Wanchain (WAN)Tradear fácilmente con Wanchain (WAN) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

200 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de WAN (WAN).